Transfusion Medicine in Chicago, Before and After the “Blood Bank”

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 310-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn Ramsey ◽  
Paul J. Schmidt
Transfusion ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 2490-2494
Author(s):  
Debra Berry ◽  
Margaret DiGuardo ◽  
Yunchuan Delores Mo ◽  
Gay Wehrli

1970 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zerihun Ataro ◽  
Fekadu Urgessa ◽  
Tagesachew Wasihun

BACKGROUND: Acquisition of transfusion transmissible infections in the process of therapeutic blood transfusion is a major global health challenge in transfusion medicine. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and trends of major transfusion transmissible infections among blood donors.METHOD: A retrospective analysis of consecutive blood donors’ records covering the period between July 2010 and June 2013 was conducted at Dire Dawa Blood Bank, Eastern Ethiopia.RESULT: A total of 6376 blood donors were tested, out of which 5647(88.57%) were replacement donors and 729(11.43%) were voluntary donors. The majority of them were male, 5430(85.16%), and aged between 18–32 years, 4492(70.45%). A total of 450(7.06%) donors had serological evidence of infection with at least one pathogen. The overall positivity rates of HBV, HIV, HCV and syphilis were 4.67%, 1.24%, 0.96%, and 0.44% respectively. Trends for transfusion-transmissible infections showed a significant decrease from 9.51% in 2010 to 6.95% in 2013 with the least prevalence in 2012 (5.90% (P = 0.004). The prevalence of transfusion transmissible infections was significantly higher among male blood donors compared to female donors, among the age group of 25-32 years and 33-40 years compared to the age group of 18-24 years old, and among unemployed and private workers compared to students.CONCLUSION: A significant percentage of the blood donors harbor transfusion-transmissible infections. Stringent donor selection using standard methods is highly recommended to ensure the safety of blood for the recipient. Furthermore, efforts on motivating and creating awareness in the community are required to increase voluntary blood donors. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 063-069
Author(s):  
Ramune Sepetiene ◽  
Vaiva Patamsyte ◽  
Ninette F Robbins ◽  
Mohamed Ali ◽  
Alexander Carterson

Background: This review describes and evaluates the most relevant preanalytical errors and their impact on subsequent laboratory diagnostics. Quality management for laboratory processes remains extremely important, despite current advancements in information technologies and fully automated routine procedures. Methods: This review is focused on specific preanalytical requirements for the blood bank and transfusion laboratory. Conclusions are done based on literature review. Results: Human errors, or lack of procedures, continue to be the cause of many errors within laboratory processes. The medical laboratory needs an impetus and stipulation to improve processes, to help eliminate errors, and meet regulatory guidelines. Conclusions: General preanalytical rules exist for clinical and research laboratories but differences in laboratory specialty and provided services influence compliance


Transfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hollie M. Reeves ◽  
Erin Goodhue Meyer ◽  
Sarah K. Harm ◽  
Lani Lieberman ◽  
Ryan Pyles ◽  
...  

Transfusion ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 629-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janaina C. Souza ◽  
Myuki A. E. Crispim ◽  
Claudia Abrahim ◽  
Nelson A. Fraiji ◽  
Dagmar Kiesslich ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S18-S19
Author(s):  
Denis Noubouossie ◽  
Marisa B Marques ◽  
R Chad Siniard ◽  
Jose L O Lima

Abstract A few individuals with undetectable IgA develop anti-IgA, which is theorized to promote anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reactions to blood products. Here, we describe a recurrent, unusual reaction in a patient with no IgA or IgM, and anti-IgA present. The patient is a 49-year-old male with cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis C, who presented to the emergency department in January of 2014 with abdominal distension, leg swelling and dyspnea. He was severely anemic with a hemoglobin of 4.5 g/dL. Several minutes into a transfusion, he complained of chills, dyspnea and back pain. The transfusion was discontinued after <10mL, and his symptoms resolved rapidly without further intervention. The patient’s blood pressure, heart rate and temperature before and after the reaction were 134/63 mmHg and 180/64 mmHg, 98 beats/minute (bpm) and 102 bpm, and 98.6⁰ F and 98.7⁰ F, respectively. A laboratory workup for hemolysis was negative pre- and post-transfusion and an “OK to transfuse” order was given if future blood products were indicated. The following day, another transfusion of PRBCs was stopped after <75 mL due to similar symptoms, which again resolved rapidly; no vital signs changes or signs of hemolysis were noted. Because he was receiving other fluids concurrently with the PRBCs, it was recommended to transfuse future products slowly and to premedicate with furosemide. Although he tolerated three subsequent PRBC transfusions during the same admission, he developed the same clinical picture as soon as <75mL of a platelet unit was started. At that time, unbeknownst to Transfusion Medicine, the primary care team ordered immunoglobulin levels and anti-IgA, and the results of these tests were entered into his electronic medical record (EMR) after discharge. Approximately six years later, the patient was readmitted following a fall and was found to be thrombocytopenic. After receiving <30 mL of platelets, he developed back pain and headache and the transfusion was aborted. His wife informed the primary provider that her husband was IgA-deficient. When Transfusion Medicine was notified, a review of his EMR showed undetectable IgA (<6 mg/dL: reference: 46-236 mg/dL) and IgM (<25 mg/dL; reference 43-279 mg/dL) and mildly increased IgG (1787 mg/dL; reference 650-1643 mg/dL) from 2014. Additionally, a high-titer IgG anti-IgA (>1000 U/mL; reference <99 U/mL), had been reported. In lieu of these findings, we changed his transfusion requirements to issue only washed PRBCs and IgA-deficient platelets and plasma, but he has not required any blood products since the last reaction. While a definitive cause and effect has not been established, this case suggests that severe IgA- and IgM-deficiency with IgG anti-IgA may be associated with nonspecific symptoms even with the transfusion of small volumes (<75 mL). To our knowledge, similar reactions have not been previously reported.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document