Ramaria flavo-brunnescens mushroom poisoning in South America: A comprehensive review

Toxicon ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 205 ◽  
pp. 91-98
Author(s):  
Haide Valeska Scheid ◽  
Eliza Simone Viégas Sallis ◽  
Franklin Riet-Correa ◽  
Ana Lucia Schild
2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Elisa Schreckinger ◽  
Jennifer Lotton ◽  
Mary Ann Lila ◽  
Elvira Gonzalez de Mejia

1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 240
Author(s):  
William J. Foley

In the early 1980s advances in marsupial biology could no longer be encapsulated in a single volume such as Hugh Tyndale-Biscoe's "Life of Marsupials" and Cambridge University Press commissioned a series of monographs covering a range of different topics in marsupial biology. As it was, only three of that series were realized and among them was the ptedecessor to this book "Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of Marsupials" published in 1982. "Marsupial Nutrition" is a considerably expanded and comprehensive review of studies of nutrition and digestive physiology of Australasian and South American marsupials. In Australia, many ecologists view the limited nutrient status of our soils and vegetation as a fundamental limit to animal populations. This book explains firstly how Australian marsupials have responded to those limitations and secondly asks whether these responses are common amongst marsupials living in New Guinea and South America.


Phytotaxa ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 317 (3) ◽  
pp. 161 ◽  
Author(s):  
LAURA MUÑOZ-PUELLES ◽  
FRANCISCO LARA ◽  
VICENTE MAZIMPAKA ◽  
RICARDO GARILLETI

Ulota pygmaeothecia (Müll.Hal.) Kindb. and Ulota luteola (Hook.f. & Wilson) Wijk & Margad. are two epiphytic mosses from the evergreen Magellanic rainforests of southern South America. Both mosses have been considered as distinct species since their original description, with their specific status retained following the comprehensive review by Nicolajs Malta of South American Ulota (1927). Recently the synonymization of U. pygmaeothecia and U. luteola was proposed (Wang & Jia 2016), based mainly on the similarities stated in the protologues and the study of the available type specimens of U. pygmaeothecia and U. fulvella, as the type materials of U. luteola were lost in the mail. In the present paper, all available type material for names associated with these two taxa, together with additional specimens recently collected, have been studied in depth. As a result, it has been found that both mosses show important sporophytic and gametophytic differences, both qualitative and quantitative, that allow for a precise distinction between them and they are reinstated here as distinct species. The morphological features that best differentiate U. luteola and U. pygmaeothecia are discussed and illustrated with light microscope and SEM pictures. Finally, an updated and detailed description of each species is presented.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. e1525390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Cuadrelli ◽  
Alfredo E. Zurita ◽  
Pablo Toriño ◽  
Ángel R. Miño-Boilini ◽  
Santiago Rodríguez-Bualó ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 529-529
Author(s):  
Mary Catherine King
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document