A science driven framework for the safety assessment of technologically justified food additives during early life

2016 ◽  
Vol 259 ◽  
pp. S230
Author(s):  
B. Mahadevan ◽  
J.A. Garthoff ◽  
L. Meunier ◽  
C.L. Bradley ◽  
J.D. Richards ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 280 ◽  
pp. S218
Author(s):  
A. Wallace Hayes ◽  
Anne Constable ◽  
Brinda Mahadevan ◽  
Dieter Schrenk ◽  
Jossie Garthof ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 239784731880604
Author(s):  
April Neal-Kluever ◽  
Queenster Nartey ◽  
Jason Aungst ◽  
Federica Basso ◽  
Karen Davis-Bruno ◽  
...  

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Division of Food Contact Notifications (DFCN) performs infant lifestage-specific exposure and safety assessments during the premarket review of FCNs proposed for use with infant formula or human milk. DFCN previously identified two protocols that may be best suited to support infant safety: the multigenerational developmental and reproductive toxicology (Gen-DART) protocol and the juvenile animal study (JAS) protocol. The Gen-DART protocol tests chemical exposure from prior to mating through one or two generations in rodents, while JAS protocols test a chemical during a specific developmental window. At FDA, Gen-DART studies are currently recommended to support the safety of food additives (FAs), including food contact substances, across lifestages (from conception through adulthood). JAS protocols are recommended in the nonclinical safety assessment of drugs seeking pediatric indications. To improve our recommendations regarding the use of either Gen-DART or JAS protocols for the infant safety assessment of food contact materials, we created a database of FDA-reviewed Gen-DART or JAS. Our database contains information from 41 Gen-DART studies (38 FAs) and 51 JAS (29 drugs). Both protocols can detect toxicity relevant to infant safety assessment, such as developmental toxicity in neurological, endocrine, reproductive, immunological, or skeletal systems. Selection of either protocol will depend on the amount of information available for the chemical under study. The Gen-DART protocol may be preferred when limited data on the mode of action or target organ of the chemical are available. However, if these data are available, a JAS may provide the best assessment of potential juvenile toxicity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 257 ◽  
pp. 211-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Mohammadzadeh-Aghdash ◽  
Yousef Sohrabi ◽  
Ali Mohammadi ◽  
Dariush Shanehbandi ◽  
Parvin Dehghan ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Sobotka

One of the primary features of the mission of the Food and Drug Administration is to assure with reasonable certainty that no harm will result from the intended use of chemicals added to food. In carrying out this mission the FDA uses a structured process to assess the safety of each food chemical. The detailed mechanics of this process are described in an FDA document entitled “Toxicological Principles for the Safety Assessment of Direct Food Additives and Color Additives Use in Food” (Food and Drug Administration, 1982). Central to its evaluation the FDA requires a collective set of information, including estimates of the anticipated human exposure to the food chemical and a broad-based toxicological profile. Certainly, any adverse effect observed in the nervous system is recognized as an important element in the determination of chemical safety and follow-up information which would enable an assessment of such an effect to be included in the toxicological profile. The agency's current approach to evaluating neurotoxicity should be viewed within the context of its overall strategy for the safety assessment of food chemicals. Four basic premises underlie the FDA's approach to safety assessment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 259 ◽  
pp. S66
Author(s):  
M.S. Stavanja

2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5S-12S ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Burnett ◽  
Bart Heldreth ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
...  

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed the safety of animal- and plant-derived amino acid mixtures, which function as skin and hair conditioning agents. The safety of α-amino acids as direct food additives has been well established, based on extensive research through acute and chronic dietary exposures and the Panel previously has reviewed the safety of individual α-amino acids in cosmetics. The Panel focused its review on dermal irritation and sensitization data relevant to the use of these ingredients in topical cosmetics. The Panel concluded that these 21 ingredients are safe in the present practices of use and concentration as used in cosmetics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document