Platelet concentrates, from whole blood or collected by apheresis?

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter F. van der Meer
Transfusion ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 1723-1728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria L. Lozano ◽  
Elena Pérez-Ceballos ◽  
Jose Rivera ◽  
Dragica Paunovic ◽  
Maria J. Candela ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
GhadaM El-Gohary ◽  
AzzaS El-Danasoury ◽  
MahiraI El-Mogy ◽  
Amal Farouk ◽  
GhadaS Neseem

Blood ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
FREDERICK A. FLATOW ◽  
EMIL J. FREIREICH

Abstract Platelet concentrates prepared in acidified plasma (pH 6.5-6.7) are superior to concentrates prepared by standard methods, and are 80-90 per cent as effective as platelet rich plasma (PRP). The use of excess citric acid to acidify plasma promotes resuspension of the concentrate by eliminating clumping, which is a major factor in the decreased effectiveness of standard concentrates. Analysis of posttransfusion recovery and survival of platelets reveals no evidence of platelet injury in an acid medium. Acidification of PRP inhibits the aggregation of platelets by adenosine diphosphate (ADP). The presence of endogenous ADP may be an important factor in clumping during standard concentrate preparation. A method of acidification of PRP using citric acid is described which allows preparation of an effective concentrate from fresh whole blood without subjecting the red cells to acid pH. Reconstitution of the acidified platelet poor plasma and its native red cells increases the citrate molarity by less than 6 per cent and results in minimal decrease in pH of the whole blood.


Vox Sanguinis ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Sanz ◽  
A. Pereira ◽  
A.I. Faúndez ◽  
A. Ordinas

Blood ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 548-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
SHIRLEY EBBE ◽  
MARIO BALDINI ◽  
JANET DONOVAN

Abstract Four methods for measuring the survival of homologous platelets in rabbits were studied: (1) transfusion of nonradioactive platelet concentrates to thrombocytopenic recipients, (2) transfusion of concentrates of platelets labeled in vitro with Cr51-sodium chromate, (3) transfusion of concentrates of platelets labeled in vivo with P32-orthophosphate and (4) transfusion of whole blood labeled in vivo with P32-orthophosphate. The survival time of platelets in normal rabbits was 3-4 days. From comparison of the 3 methods using platelet concentrates, the following conclusions were drawn. (1) All the platelets in a platelet concentrate were capable of recirculating after transfusion. (2) Labeling with P32 or Cr51 did not damage platelets. (3) About one-third of the Cr51 was immediately eluted from viable platelets after they were transfused. (4) Further exchange of the label in vivo did not occur to a significant degree with either Cr51 or P32. (5) Cr51 did not elute from platelets during storage of the platelets. (6) Studies of rabbit platelets had applicability in predicting the behavior of human platelets.


Transfusion ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 644-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert Schrezenmeier ◽  
Gabriele Walther-Wenke ◽  
Thomas H. Müller ◽  
Franz Weinauer ◽  
Adelheid Younis ◽  
...  

Transfusion ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 410-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Eve Moreau ◽  
Louis Thibault ◽  
Anik Désormeaux ◽  
Miguel Chagnon ◽  
Réal Lemieux ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 956-956
Author(s):  
Miguel Lozano ◽  
Ana Galan ◽  
Roberto Mazzara ◽  
Laurence Corash ◽  
Gines Escolar

Abstract Background: The risk of bacterial growth has limited the shelf life of platelet concentrates (PC) to 5 days. Modern platelet storage containers facilitate storage for up to 7 days, if bacterial contamination is prevented. INTERCEPT (Baxter, La Chatre, France; Cerus, Concord, CA) photochemical treatment (PCT) for pathogen reduction based on amotosalen (150μM) and UVA illumination (3 J/cm2) inactivates high titers of bacteria in PC (Transfusion2004; 44: 1496–1504). Adhesion and aggregation of platelets to injured vascular surfaces are critical aspects of platelet hemostatic function. In this study, the adhesion and aggregation of leucocyte-reduced buffy coat derived PC (BCPC), treated with INTERCEPT and stored up to 7 days, were measured on injured vascular surfaces using an ex-vivo blood flow system. Methods: BCPC were prepared from 450 mL-whole blood donations with the top and bottom method (Optipress II, Baxter). Five BCPC, of the same ABO group, were pooled with additive solution (Intersol™) the day following collection, after viral screening testing was completed. Following centrifugation and leukocyte depletion, two BCPC pools of the same ABO group were mixed and divided. One pooled BCPC was treated with INTERCEPT (I-BCPC) and the other was prepared by conventional methods (C-BCPC); and both were stored in 1.3 liter PL2410 plastic containers (Baxter R4R7012) at 22 ± 2°C with continuous agitation for 7 days. Samples for hemostatic function testing were taken immediately after preparation before splitting for treatment and after 5 and 7 days of storage. Platelet counts were performed in K3EDTA in a Coulter MD II counter (Coulter, Miami, FL). Samples of I-BCPC and C-BCPC were added to citrate anticoagulated blood, previously depleted of platelets and leukocytes by filtration, and adjusted to a final platelet count of 150x109/L. Enzymatically denuded vascular segments were exposed to circulating whole blood, reconstituted with I-BCPC and C-BCPC, in Baumgartner chambers at a shear rate of 800 s−1 for 10 minutes. The proportion (%) of the vascular surface area covered by platelets after perfusion was measured for each type of BCPC (N = 9) at each storage time point. Platelets and groups of platelets were classified as adhesive when platelet masses were less than 5 μm in height and as thrombi when height exceeded 5 μm. Data were analyzed with the SPSS 12.0.1 statistical package with significance at p < 0.05, and expressed at the mean ± SEM Results(Table). Conclusion: The platelet count of I- BCPC decreased by 12.3% including PCT processing losses and 7 days of storage. However, I- BCPC platelet adhesive and aggregatory capacities under flow conditions were similar to C- BCPC, and were well conserved for up to 7 days of storage. Hemostatic Function of Stored I-BCPC and C-BCPC Parameter I-BCPC C-BCPC p Day 1(Pre Treatment) Platelet Count (109/L) 945±40 945±40 Platelet Coverage (%) 26.0±3.7 26.0±4.2 Adhesion(%) 24.0±3.7 24.0±3.7 Thrombus(%) 1.9±0.6 1.9±0.6 Day 5 Storage Platelet Count (109/L 844±41 902±44 0.004 Platelet Coverage (%) 20.9±2.2 20.6±1.6 0.9 Adhesion(%) 19.9±2.1 19.3±1.4 0.8 Thrombus(%) 0.9±0.3 1.2±0.4 0.5 Day 7 Storage Platelet Count (109/L) 829±32 923±48 0.008 Platelet Coverage (%) 27.1±2.9 21.2±2.8 0.06 Adhesion(%) 26.0±2.7 20.4±2.7 0.06 Thrombus(%) 1.2±0.3 0.7±0.2 0.16


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document