Role of financial toxicity in perpetuating health disparities

Author(s):  
Kanan Shah ◽  
S. Yousuf Zafar ◽  
Fumiko Chino
Author(s):  
Gilda A. Barabino

AbstractThe role of engineers in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and in the elimination of health disparities, while not always visible, has important implications for the attainment of impactful solutions. The design skills, systems approach, and innovative mindset that engineers bring all have the potential to combat crises in novel and impactful ways. When a disparities lens is applied, a lens that views gaps in access, resources, and care, the engineering solutions are bound to be more robust and equitable. The disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on the Black community and other communities of color is linked to inequities in health rooted in a centuries long structural racism. Engineers working collaboratively with physicians and healthcare providers are poised to close equity gaps and strengthen the collective response to COVID-19 and future pandemics.


Author(s):  
Carla Thamm ◽  
Jennifer Fox ◽  
Nicolas H. Hart ◽  
Joel Rhee ◽  
Bogda Koczwara ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 483-488
Author(s):  
Uzoamaka Asonye ◽  
Nicholas Apping ◽  
Leonardo V. Lopez ◽  
Dennis M. Popeo

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-116
Author(s):  
Adolfo G. Cuevas ◽  
Sarah Levine ◽  
Jonathan Purtle
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Rivera Mindt ◽  
Micah J. Savin ◽  
Emily P. Morris ◽  
Angela Summers ◽  
Maral N. Aghvinian ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 189 (10) ◽  
pp. 1033-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lan N Ðoàn ◽  
Adrian M Bacong ◽  
Kris Pui Kwan Ma ◽  
Brittany N Morey

Abstract We present interpretations of the idea that “epidemiologists count” in response to the current status of membership and diversity and inclusion efforts within the Society for Epidemiological Research (SER). We review whom epidemiologists count to describe the (mis)representation of SER membership and how categorizations of people reflect social constructions of identity and biases that exist in broader society. We argue that what epidemiologists count—how diversity and inclusion are operationalized—has real-world implications on institutional norms and how inclusive/non-inclusive environments are. Finally, we examine which epidemiologists count within the field and argue that inclusion can only be achieved when we address how resources and opportunities are distributed among epidemiologists. To improve diversity and inclusion within SER and beyond, we recommend that SER strengthen its commitment to diversity, inclusion, and equity by: 1) integrating this priority on all agendas; 2) enhancing efforts to improve self-awareness among members and accountability within the organization; 3) supporting the growth of a diversifying workforce in epidemiology; and 4) increasing the visibility of health disparities research and researchers in epidemiology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document