Genome-edited tree crops: mind the socioeconomic implementation gap

Author(s):  
Manuel Toledo-Hernández ◽  
Tonya Allen Lander ◽  
Chen Bao ◽  
Kabin Xie ◽  
Acheampong Atta-Boateng ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thami Croeser ◽  
Georgia E. Garrard ◽  
Freya M. Thomas ◽  
Trinh Duc Tran ◽  
Ian Mell ◽  
...  

AbstractNature-based solutions (NBS) are increasingly at the centre of urban strategies to mitigate heatwaves and flooding, improve public health and restore biodiversity. However, on-ground implementation has been slow, inconsistent and often limited to demonstration sites. A broad literature consistently highlights institutional barriers as a major reason for the observed implementation gap. In this study, we developed and deployed an assessment tool to identify barriers to NBS delivery on a European Commission Horizon 2020 project spanning seven cities. We found that practitioners were effectively navigating challenges in the areas where they had significant control, including community engagement, strategy development and technical skills. The greatest barriers were outside the influence of project teams: understaffing, a lack of intra-organisational processes, and risk-averse organisational cultures. These findings emphasise that after cities embrace NBS at the strategic and political level, it is vital that executives follow through with the necessary pragmatic reforms to enable delivery.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Heckman

<p>Environmental concerns associated with annual row crop grain production – including soil erosion, soil carbon loss, intensive use of chemicals and petroleum, limited arable land, among others – could be addressed by converting conventional livestock production to an organic pasture based system. The inclusion of tree crops would further enhance the opportunity for feeding pasture- raised livestock by providing shelter and alternative feed sources. Biodiversity is an essential aspect of an organic farm plan. The idea of including tree crops and other perennials into the vision of an organic farm as a “living system” is very much compatible with the goals and philosophy of organic farming. Before modern no-till farming systems were developed, tree crops and pasture systems were found to provide similar benefits for controlling soil erosion and conserving soil carbon. For example, J. Russell Smith’s <em>Tree Crops: A Permanent Agriculture</em> (Smith, 1950) and pioneered tree crop agriculture as the alternative to annual row crops for protecting soils from erosion while producing livestock feed such as acorns, nuts, and fodder. A survey of Mid-Atlantic USA soils under pasture found 60% higher soil organic matter content than cultivated fields. Because United States Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Program (USDA-NOP) standards require dairy cattle consume pasture forage and limited grain (7 C.F.R. pt. 206), organic milk contains higher concentrations of omega-3 and fewer omega-6 fatty acids than conventional milk. Organic standards also state “the producer must not use lumber treated with arsenate or other prohibited materials for new [fence posts] installations or replacement purposes in contact with soil or livestock.” Black locust (<em>Robinia pseudoacacia</em>) is a fast growing renewable alternative to treated lumber with many attributes compatible with organic farming. This versatile tree fixes nitrogen (N), provides flowers for honey bees and other pollinators, and produces a highly durable dense wood ideal for fence posts useable for up to 50 year.</p>


1995 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hon S. Chan ◽  
Koon-kwai Wong ◽  
K. C. Cheung ◽  
Jack Man-keung Lo

Biotropica ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 173 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Majer ◽  
P. Camer-Pesci
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 104 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 395-402
Author(s):  
V. Thomas ◽  
C. K. Saraswathy Amma ◽  
M. R. Sethuraj

2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (spe) ◽  
pp. 30-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Guenter Brauch

This article analyzes the climate policy performance of the G-8 from 1992 to 2012 based on their legal commitments (Annex-1 and Annex-B countries) under the UNFCCC (1992) and the Kyoto Protocol (1997) and their policy declarations on their GHG reduction goals until 2050. A climate paradox has emerged due to a growing implementation gap in Canada, USA and Japan, while Russia, Germany, UK, France and Italy fulfilled their GHG reduction obligation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document