Defining a risk area for tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in a country where TBE is emerging, the Netherlands, July 2016-October 2020

2022 ◽  
pp. 101898
Author(s):  
Felix Geeraedts ◽  
Agnes Wertenbroek ◽  
Jabke de Klerk ◽  
Jan J. Prick ◽  
Loes J.A. Reichman ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1028-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Setareh Jahfari ◽  
Ankje de Vries ◽  
Jolianne M. Rijks ◽  
Steven Van Gucht ◽  
Harry Vennema ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margriet Dekker ◽  
Gozewijn Dirk Laverman ◽  
Ankje de Vries ◽  
Johan Reimerink ◽  
Felix Geeraedts

Author(s):  
Johannes Hermanus Jozef Reimerink ◽  
Hein Sprong ◽  
Agnetha Hofhuis ◽  
Chantal B.E.M Reusken

Until 2015, tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) was presumed not to be endemic in the Netherlands.1,2 Consequently, the number of diagnostic requests for detection of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) infection had been low. Between 2006 and 2015, the laboratory of the Netherlands Centre of Infectious Disease Control (Clb), 1 of the 2 laboratories that performed TBEV diagnostics in the Netherlands at the time, received an average of 20 (range 12–27) requests for TBE diagnostics per year. In the same period, TBE was diagnosed in 7 Dutch patients. All of these cases were considered to be travel-related. Indeed, 6 out of 7 patients reported that they had recently travelled to TBEV-endemic countries such as Austria (4), Germany (1), and Sweden (1).


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S426-S426
Author(s):  
Sarah Pugh ◽  
Wilhelm Erber ◽  
Andreas Pilz ◽  
Heinz-Josef Schmitt

Abstract Background Tick-borne Encephalitis (TBE) is a CNS infection caused by the TBE virus (TBEV), transmitted by ticks or by ingestions of unpasteurized dairy products. Persisting sequelae occur in up to 50% of patients and case fatality rates are 0.4-6% (up to 20% in Russia). There is no specific treatment, but prevention exists. New areas of TBEV circulation were recently identified. Here the current distribution of the TBEV by the end of 2019 is summarized. Methods Data were obtained from solicitation of local expert data from countries in Europe and Asia on TBEV isolation, type of surveillance/reporting, past/current case counts, and vaccine uptake, supplemented by literature searches. Countries were classified as suggested by the European Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) as TBE- “predisposed” (competent ticks present), “imperiled” (TBEV isolated), “affected” (sporadic autochthonous cases) or “endemic” (annually autochthonous cases). Results TBE has now been diagnosed in Eurasia from the United Kingdom, Norway and France in the west, northern Italy in the south, central/eastern Europe, Russia, China on to Japan in the east. “New endemic” countries in the last five years include the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, as well as “new endemic regions”, e.g. in France, Norway, Germany, Finland and Poland. Six countries are considered as predisposed only, three as imperiled, five as affected and 29 as endemic. Misclassification is likely as some countries have no testing (no test), incomplete testing and/or underreporting. Conclusion The main considerations of TBEV risk for oversea travelers to Eurasia are: 1) the exact region and terrain within a country; 2) the planned type of (outdoor) activity; 3) the reliability of within country TBEV surveillance. TBE incidences per region may fluctuate log-fold over just a few years and low reported case counts may reflect a lack of testing, and/or preventive measures including vaccine uptake, and underreporting. As the incidence of TBE is unpredictable, prevention measures should be considered for any person traveling or residing in a recognized TBE “risk area”. Disclosures Sarah Pugh, PhD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Wilhelm Erber, PhD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Andreas Pilz, PhD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Heinz-Josef Schmitt, MD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder)


Until 2015, tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) was presumed not to be endemic in the Netherlands.1,2 Consequently, the number of diagnostic requests for detection of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) infection had been low. Between 2006 and 2015, the laboratory of the Netherlands Centre of Infectious Disease Control, 1 of the 2 laboratories that performed TBEV diagnostics in the Netherlands at the time, received an average of 20 (range 12–27) requests for TBE diagnostics per year. In the same period, TBE was diagnosed in 7 Dutch patients. All of these cases were considered to be travel-related. Indeed, 6 out of 7 patients reported that they had recently travelled to TBEV-endemic countries such as Austria (4), Germany (1), and Sweden (1).


2109 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 342-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolianne M. Rijks ◽  
Margriet G.E. Montizaan ◽  
Nine Bakker ◽  
Ankje de Vries ◽  
Steven Van Gucht ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (33) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joris A de Graaf ◽  
Johan H J Reimerink ◽  
G Paul Voorn ◽  
Elisabeth A bij de Vaate ◽  
Ankje de Vries ◽  
...  

In July 2016, the first autochthonous case of tick-borne encephalitis was diagnosed in the Netherlands, five days after a report that tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) had been found in Dutch ticks. A person in their 60s without recent travel history suffered from neurological symptoms after a tick bite. TBEV serology was positive and the tick was positive in TBEV qRT-PCR. TBEV infection should be considered in patients with compatible symptoms in the Netherlands.


1995 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. G. A. M. van der Avoort ◽  
J. H. J. Reimerink ◽  
A. Ras ◽  
M. N. Mulders ◽  
A. M. van Loon

SUMMARYTo examine the extent of wild poliovirus circulation during the 1992–3 epidemic in the Netherlands caused by poliovirus type 3, 269 samples from sewage pipelines at 120 locations were examined for the presence of poliovirus. The epidemic virus strain was found in 23 samples, all from locations inside the risk area which contained communities that refuse vaccination for religious reasons. By sewage investigation, the wildtype virus was shown to be present in the early phase of the epidemic at two locations, one week before patients were reported from that area. The wild type 3 poliovirus was also detected retrospectively in a river water sample collected for other reasons three weeks before notification of the first poliomyelitis case, at a site a few kilometres upstream the home village of this patient. Oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) virus was found at 28 locations inside or at the border of the risk area. Trivalent OPV was offered to unvaccinated or incompletely-vaccinated persons living in this region as part of the measures to control the epidemic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document