Vascularity of Intra-testicular Lesions: Inter-observer Variation in the Assessment of Non-neoplastic Versus Neoplastic Abnormalities After Vascular Enhancement With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 2956-2964
Author(s):  
Phillip F.C. Lung ◽  
Cheng Fang ◽  
Ounali S. Jaffer ◽  
Annamaria Deganello ◽  
Aarti Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observer Variation ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Testicular Lesions ◽  
Vascular Enhancement

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound as a valuable imaging modality for characterizing testicular lesions

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Qi Jiang ◽  
Fan Li ◽  
Jie Yu ◽  
Xin-Hui Jiang ◽  
Lian-Fang Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Testicular Lesions

Should We Use Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the Characterization of Nonpalpable Testicular Lesions? An Analysis from a Cost-Effectiveness Perspective

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (06) ◽  
pp. 668-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Rübenthaler ◽  
Su Hwan Kim ◽  
Wolfgang G. Kunz ◽  
Wieland H. Sommer ◽  
Matthias Trottmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Imaging Method ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Case Scenario ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Testicular Lesions ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Purpose Accurate characterization of testicular lesions is crucial to allow for correct treatment of malignant tumors and to avoid unnecessary procedures in benign ones. In recent years, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) proved to be superior in specifying the dignity of small, nonpalpable testicular lesions (< 1.5 cm) compared to native B-mode and color Doppler ultrasound which were previously regarded as the primary imaging method. However, the cost-effectiveness of CEUS has not been evaluated yet. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of CEUS as compared to unenhanced ultrasound for the characterization of nonpalpable testicular lesions. Methods A decision model based on Markov simulations estimated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with unenhanced ultrasound and CEUS. Model input parameters were obtained from recent literature. Deterministic sensitivity analysis of diagnostic parameters and costs was performed. Also, probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte-Carlo Modelling was applied. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) was set to $100 000/QALY. Results In the base-case scenario, unenhanced ultrasound resulted in total costs of $5113.14 and an expected effectiveness of 8.29 QALYs, whereas CEUS resulted in total costs of $4397.77 with 8.35 QALYs. Therefore, the unenhanced ultrasound strategy was dominated by CEUS in the base-case scenario. Sensitivity analysis showed CEUS to be the cost-effective alternative along a broad range of costs. Conclusion Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a cost-effective imaging method for the characterization of nonpalpable testicular lesions.

1687: Directed Prostate Biopsies Utilizing Microflow Imaging During Microbubble Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 560-560
Author(s):  
Robert A. Linden ◽  
Paul R. Gittens ◽  
Flemming Forsberg ◽  
Edouard J. Trabulsi ◽  
Leonard G. Gomella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

1929: Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Monitoring of Radiofrequency Ablation

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 509-510
Author(s):  
D Brooke Johnson ◽  
David A. Duchene ◽  
Grant D. Taylor ◽  
Jeffrey A. Cadeddu
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Ultrasound Monitoring ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

Positive correlation between neovascularization degree of carotid atherosclerosis determined by contrast-enhanced ultrasound and level of serum C-reactive protein

VASA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 0187-0194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoni Chang ◽  
Jun Feng ◽  
Litao Ruan ◽  
Jing Shang ◽  
Yanqiu Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Contrast Enhancement ◽  
Rank Correlation ◽  
Artery Stenosis ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Axis View

Background: Neovascularization is one of the most important risk factors for unstable plaque. This study was designed to correlate plaque thickness, artery stenosis and levels of serum C-reactive protein with the degree of intraplaque enhancement determined by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Patients and methods: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound was performed on 72 carotid atherosclerotic plaques in 48 patients. Contrast enhancement within the plaque was categorized as grade 1, 2 or 3. Maximum plaque thickness was measured in short-axis view. Carotid artery stenosis was categorized as mild, moderate or severe. Results: Plaque contrast enhancement was not associated with the degree of artery stenosis or with plaque thickness. Serum C-reactive protein levels were positively correlated with the number of new vessels in the plaque. C-reactive protein levels increased in the three groups(Grade 1: 3.72±1.79mg/L; Grade 2: 7.88±4.24 mg/L; Grade 3: 11.02±3.52 mg/L), with significant differences among them (F=10.14, P<0.01), and significant differences between each two groups (P<0.05). Spearman’s rank correlation analysis showed that serum C-reactive protein levels were positively correlated with the degree of carotid plaque enhancement (Rs =0.69, P<0.01). Conclusions: The combination of C-reactive protein levels and intraplaque neovascularization detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasound may allow more accurate evaluation of plaque stability.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the abdominal aorta – current status and future perspectives

VASA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Li ◽  
Daniel Staub ◽  
Vasileios Rafailidis ◽  
Mohammed Al-Natour ◽  
Sanjeeva Kalva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Vascular Diseases ◽  
Aneurysm Rupture ◽  
Vasa Vasorum ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Aortic Diseases ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Vascular Abnormalities ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

Abstract. Ultrasound has been established as an important diagnostic tool in assessing vascular abnormalities. Standard B-mode and Doppler techniques have inherent limitations with regards to detection of slow flow and small vasculature. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a complementary tool and is useful in assessing both the macro- and microvascular anatomy of the aorta. CEUS can also provide valuable physiological information in real-time scanning sessions due to the physical and safety profiles of the administered microbubbles. From a macrovascular perspective, CEUS has been used to characterize aortic aneurysm rupture, dissection and endoleaks post-EVAR repair. With regard to microvasculature CEUS enables imaging of adventitial vasa vasorum thereby assessing aortic inflammation processes, such as monitoring treatment response in chronic periaortitis. CEUS may have additional clinical utility since adventitial vasa vasorum has important implications in the pathogenesis of aortic diseases. In recent years, there have been an increasing number of studies comparing CEUS to cross-sectional imaging for aortic applications. For endoleak surveillance CEUS has been shown to be equal or in certain cases superior in comparison to CT angiography. The recent advancement of CEUS software along with the ongoing development of drug-eluting contrast microbubbles has allowed improved targeted detection and real-time ultrasound guided therapy for aortic vasa vasorum inflammation and neovascularization in animal models. Therefore, CEUS is uniquely suited to comprehensively assess and potentially treat aortic vascular diseases in the future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document