Management of neonates with large abdominal wall defects and undescended testis

Urology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas P. Berger ◽  
Josef Hager
2021 ◽  
pp. 521-552

This chapter outlines the principles of managing paediatric surgical cases. It provides an overview of the assessment of a child with abdominal wall defects, inguinal or scrotal swellings and neck swellings. Conditions such as oesophageal atresia, phyloric stenosis, malrotation and volvulus, intussusception, hirschsprung’s disease, necrotizing enterocolitis, childhood hernias, undescended testis and solid tumours of childhood.


Author(s):  
Arimatias Raitio ◽  
Johanna Syvänen ◽  
Asta Tauriainen ◽  
Anna Hyvärinen ◽  
Ulla Sankilampi ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Several studies have reported high prevalence of undescended testis (UDT) among boys with congenital abdominal wall defects (AWD). Due to rarity of AWDs, however, true prevalence of testicular maldescent among these boys is not known. We conducted a national register study to determine the prevalence of UDT among Finnish males with an AWD. Methods All male infants with either gastroschisis or omphalocele born between Jan 1, 1998 and Dec 31, 2015 were identified in the Register of Congenital Malformations. The data on all performed operations were acquired from the Care Register for Health Care. The register data were examined for relevant UDT diagnosis and operation codes. Results We identified 99 males with gastroschisis and 89 with omphalocele. UDT was diagnosed in 10 (10.1%) infants with gastroschisis and 22 (24.7%) with omphalocele. Majority of these required an operation; 8/99 (8.1%) gastroschisis and 19/89 (21.3%) omphalocele patients. UDT is more common among AWD patients than general population with the highest prevalence in omphalocele. Conclusions Cryptorchidism is more common among boys with an AWD than general population. Furthermore, omphalocele carries significantly higher risk of UDT and need for orchidopexy than gastroschisis. Due to high prevalence testicular maldescent, careful follow-up for UDT is recommended.


2018 ◽  
Vol 0 (4) ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
O. V. Panchuk ◽  
V. G. Mishalov ◽  
I. M. Leschishin ◽  
V. F. Simonov ◽  
E. G. Donets ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (7) ◽  
pp. 1648-1651
Author(s):  
Bogdan Mihnea Ciuntu ◽  
Ciprian Vasiluta ◽  
Robert Negru ◽  
Roxana Hultoana ◽  
Roxana Ciuntu ◽  
...  

The study aims to assess the significance of negative pressure therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot.The objectives intend to evaluate the healing time required after applying the method and the functional consequences for the patient. A prospective study was conducted on a sample of 37 patients with diabetic foot were monitored their clinical course between September 2014 - April 2017, following negative pressure therapy. There were used vacuum assisted closure devices (VAC � -Hartman) in order to apply negative pressure to the wound, while complying with specified settings (negative pressure, time of use of a kit) in accordance with patients� outcome.There were monitored changes in wound size (planimetric and volumetric measurement), their bacterial load and duration of treatment. Healing was obtained in all cases, to an average hospital stay of 27.3 days and 8 days of therapy application.The negative result of microbial cultures was obtained after an average of 6.45 days by simultaneous application of negative pressure and antibiotic treatment according to the antibiogram. Skin grafts were necessary to close the defect in 4 cases. After basic treatment of the wound, auxiliary methods such as negative pressure contribute to the healing.In patients with diabetic foot who were required surgical intervention, the use of negative pressure therapy yielded a significant benefit in the preservation of the affected limb, after minimal excision.The results we obtained throughout our experience recommend use of NPTW technique as indication for abdominal wall surgery in closing abdominal wall defects, compartment syndrome and surgical site infection after prosthetic mesh.


2008 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. S112
Author(s):  
Olivia Williams ◽  
Benedicte Michel ◽  
Graham Hutchings ◽  
Pierre Bernard ◽  
Christian Debauche

Author(s):  
Laura C. HA ◽  
Amanda CRAIG ◽  
Matthew R. GRACE ◽  
Sarah S. OSMUNDSON ◽  
Emily W. TAYLOR ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-90
Author(s):  
Paul Mackenzie ◽  
William Maclean ◽  
Timothy Rockall

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 2371
Author(s):  
Selma Benito-Martínez ◽  
Bárbara Pérez-Köhler ◽  
Marta Rodríguez ◽  
Francisca García-Moreno ◽  
Verónica Gómez-Gil ◽  
...  

Prosthetic mesh infection is a devastating complication of abdominal hernia repair which impairs natural healing in the implant area, leading to increased rates of patient morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospitalization. This preclinical study was designed to assess the effects on abdominal wall tissue repair of coating meshes with a chlorhexidine or rifampicin-carboxymethylcellulose biopolymer gel in a Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infection model. Partial abdominal wall defects were created in New Zealand white rabbits (n = 20). Four study groups were established according to whether the meshes were coated or not with each of the antibacterial gels. Three groups were inoculated with S. aureus and finally repaired with lightweight polypropylene mesh. Fourteen days after surgery, implanted meshes were recovered for analysis of the gene and protein expression of collagens, macrophage phenotypes, and mRNA expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Compared to uncoated meshes, those coated with either biopolymer gel showed higher collagen 1/3 messenger RNA and collagen I protein expression, relatively increased VEGF mRNA expression, a significantly reduced macrophage response, and lower relative amounts of MMPs mRNAs. Our findings suggest that following mesh implant these coatings may help improving abdominal wall tissue repair in the presence of infection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document