scholarly journals The Potential for Genotype-by-Environment Interactions to Maintain Genetic Variation in a Model Legume–Rhizobia Mutualism

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 100114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priya Vaidya ◽  
John R. Stinchcombe
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin Lauer ◽  
Andrew Sims ◽  
Steven McKeand ◽  
Fikret Isik

Abstract Genetic parameters were estimated using a five-series multienvironment trial of Pinus taeda L. in the southern USA. There were 324 half-sib families planted in five test series across 37 locations. A set of six variance/covariance matrices for the genotype-by-environment (G × E) effect for tree height and diameter were compared on the basis of model fit. In single-series analysis, extended factor analytical models provided generally superior model fit to simpler models for both traits; however, in the combined-series analysis, diameter was optimally modeled using simpler variance/covariance structures. A three-way compound term for modeling G × E interactions among and within series yielded substantial improvements in terms of model fit and standard errors of predictions. Heritability of family means ranged between 0.63 and 0.90 for both height and diameter. Average additive genetic correlations among sites were 0.70 and 0.61 for height and diameter, respectively, suggesting the presence of some G × E interaction. Pairs of sites with the lowest additive genetic correlations were located at opposite ends of the latitude range. Latent factor regression revealed a small number of parents with large factor scores that changed ranks significantly between southern and northern environments. Study Implications Multienvironmental progeny tests of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) were established over 10 years in the southern United States to understand the genetic variation for the traits of economic importance. There was substantial genetic variation between open-pollinated families, suggesting that family selection would be efficient in the breeding program. Genotype-by-environment interactions were negligible among sites in the deployment region but became larger between sites at the extremes of the distribution. The data from these trials are invaluable in informing the breeding program about the genetic merit of selection candidates and their potential interaction with the environment. These results can be used to guide deployment decisions in the southern USA, helping landowners match germplasm with geography to achieve optimal financial returns and conservation outcomes.


Author(s):  
Geoff Simm ◽  
Geoff Pollott ◽  
Raphael Mrode ◽  
Ross Houston ◽  
Karen Marshall

Abstract In this chapter, topics focused on how to quantify the extent to which genes affect measured traits and how to use this information in breeding programmes. Highlights include: estimating heritability; estimating non-additive parameters, correlations, and genotype by environment interactions, molecular genetics and trait variations; and calculating inbreeding using SNP markers.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska S. Brunner ◽  
Alan Reynolds ◽  
Ian W. Wilson ◽  
Stephen Price ◽  
Steve Paterson ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTGenotype-by-environment interactions (G x E) underpin the evolution of plastic responses in natural populations. Theory assumes that G x E interactions exist but empirical evidence from natural populations is equivocal and difficult to interpret because G x E interactions are normally univariate plastic responses to a single environmental gradient. We compared multivariate plastic responses of 43 Daphnia magna clones from the same population in a factorial experiment that crossed temperature and food environments. Multivariate plastic responses explained more than 30% of the total phenotypic variation in each environment. G x E interactions were detected in most environment combinations irrespective of the methodology used. However, the nature of G x E interactions was context-dependent and led to environment-specific differences in additive genetic variation (G-matrices). Clones that deviated from the population average plastic response were not the same in each environmental context and there was no difference in whether clones varied in the nature (phenotypic integration) or magnitude of their plastic response in different environments. Plastic responses to food were aligned with additive genetic variation (gmax) at both temperatures, whereas plastic responses to temperature were not aligned with additive genetic variation (gmax) in either food environment. These results suggest that fundamental differences may exist in the potential for our population to evolve novel responses to food versus temperature changes, and challenges past interpretations of thermal adaptation based on univariate studies.


Euphytica ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 213 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan M. Mathey ◽  
Sonali Mookerjee ◽  
Lise L. Mahoney ◽  
Kazim Gündüz ◽  
Umesh Rosyara ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document