The bispecific antibody HB-32, blockade of both VEGF and DLL4 shows potent anti-angiogenic activity in vitro and anti-tumor activity in breast cancer xenograft models

2019 ◽  
Vol 380 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rihong Zhou ◽  
Shijing Wang ◽  
Hui Wen ◽  
Min Wang ◽  
Min Wu
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 241
Author(s):  
Dong-Hoon Yeom ◽  
Yo-Seob Lee ◽  
Ilhwan Ryu ◽  
Sunju Lee ◽  
Byungje Sung ◽  
...  

Delta-like-ligand 4 (DLL4) is a promising target to augment the effects of VEGF inhibitors. A simultaneous blockade of VEGF/VEGFR and DLL4/Notch signaling pathways leads to more potent anti-cancer effects by synergistic anti-angiogenic mechanisms in xenograft models. A bispecific antibody targeting VEGF and DLL4 (ABL001/NOV1501/TR009) demonstrates more potent in vitro and in vivo biological activity compared to VEGF or DLL4 targeting monoclonal antibodies alone and is currently being evaluated in a phase 1 clinical study of heavy chemotherapy or targeted therapy pre-treated cancer patients (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03292783). However, the effects of a combination of ABL001 and chemotherapy on tumor vessels and tumors are not known. Hence, the effects of ABL001, with or without paclitaxel and irinotecan were evaluated in human gastric or colon cancer xenograft models. The combination treatment synergistically inhibited tumor progression compared to each monotherapy. More tumor vessel regression and apoptotic tumor cell induction were observed in tumors treated with the combination therapy, which might be due to tumor vessel normalization. Overall, these findings suggest that the combination therapy of ABL001 with paclitaxel or irinotecan would be a better clinical strategy for the treatment of cancer patients.


Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 4593-4606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ka-Wai Tam ◽  
Chi-Tang Ho ◽  
Shih-Hsin Tu ◽  
Wen-Jui Lee ◽  
Ching-Shui Huang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitisha K. Patel ◽  
Nianjun Tao ◽  
Kyung-Min Lee ◽  
Mariela Huerta ◽  
Heike Arlt ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) to endocrine therapy significantly increased progression-free survival, leading to their approval and incorporation into the metastatic breast cancer treatment paradigm. With these inhibitors being routinely used for patients with advanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, resistance to these agents and its impact on subsequent therapy needs to be understood. Considering the central role of ER in driving the growth of ER+ breast cancers, and thus endocrine agents being a mainstay in the treatment paradigm, the effects of prior CDK4/6i exposure on ER signaling and the relevance of ER-targeted therapy are important to investigate. The objective of this study was to evaluate the anti-tumor activity of elacestrant, a novel oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), in preclinical models of CDK4/6i resistance. Methods Elacestrant was evaluated as a single agent, and in combination with alpelisib or everolimus, in multiple in vitro models and patient-derived xenografts that represent acquired and “de novo” CDK4/6i resistance. Results Elacestrant demonstrated growth inhibition in cells resistant to all three approved CDK4/6i (palbociclib, abemaciclib, ribociclib) in both ESR1 wild-type and mutant backgrounds. Furthermore, we demonstrated that elacestrant, as a single agent and in combination, inhibited growth of patient-derived xenografts that have been derived from a patient previously treated with a CDK4/6i or exhibit de novo resistance to CDK4/6i. While the resistant lines demonstrate distinct alterations in cell cycle modulators, this did not affect elacestrant’s anti-tumor activity. In fact, we observe that elacestrant downregulates several key cell cycle players and halts cell cycle progression in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions We demonstrate that breast cancer tumor cells continue to rely on ER signaling to drive tumor growth despite exposure to CDK4/6i inhibitors. Importantly, elacestrant can inhibit this ER-dependent growth despite previously reported mechanisms of CDK4/6i resistance observed such as Rb loss, CDK6 overexpression, upregulated cyclinE1 and E2F1, among others. These data provide a scientific rationale for the evaluation of elacestrant in a post-CDK4/6i patient population. Additionally, elacestrant may also serve as an endocrine backbone for rational combinations to combat resistance.


Author(s):  
Bert Oehlen ◽  
Gaifeng Ma ◽  
Siobhan McCormack ◽  
Dong Sung Lim ◽  
Jim Tarrant ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendie D. den Brok ◽  
Stephen Chia ◽  
Cherie Bates ◽  
Steve Kalloger ◽  
Samuel Aparicio ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document