Impact of Nonresective Operations for Complicated Peptic Ulcer Disease in a High-Risk Population

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 220-221
Author(s):  
C.D. Smith
2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
pp. 1143-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian R. Smith ◽  
Samuel Eric Wilson

Over the past two decades, surgery for complicated peptic ulcer disease has evolved to a “less-is-more” approach due predominately to improved medical therapy. This study sought to determine whether a nonresective operative strategy has been an effective and prudent approach. A 20-year retrospective evaluation was conducted to compare outcomes of patients from the first decade (1990-1999) with those from the more recent decade (2000-2009). In all, 50 patients underwent surgery for complications of peptic ulcer disease, 36 in the early period and 14 in the later period, with 94 per cent being urgent or emergent. Acid-reducing procedures (vagotomy) decreased significantly from 29 to 7 over the two periods ( P = 0.04), as did gastric resections from 23 to 3 ( P = 0.01). The prevalence of H. pylori and use of NSAIDs both increased from 28 per cent to 36 per cent and 31 per cent to 43 per cent, respectively. Postoperative mortality remained unchanged, 22 per cent vs 7 per cent ( P = 0.41) over the two periods. Resections and definitive acid-reducing procedures continue to decline with no increase in adverse outcomes. This more moderate operative approach to complicated peptic ulcer surgery is appropriate given the trend towards lower mortality and improved medical treatment. In our high-risk veteran population, overall perioperative mortality, length of stay, and reoperations have been reduced.


2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
pp. S-731
Author(s):  
Nayan M. Patel ◽  
Bilal Khan ◽  
Richard Gerkin ◽  
Camron Kiafar ◽  
Francisco C. Ramirez

Gut ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 617-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheuk-Chun Szeto ◽  
Kentaro Sugano ◽  
Ji-Guang Wang ◽  
Kazuma Fujimoto ◽  
Samuel Whittle ◽  
...  

BackgroundNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most commonly prescribed medications, but they are associated with a number of serious adverse effects, including hypertension, cardiovascular disease, kidney injury and GI complications.ObjectiveTo develop a set of multidisciplinary recommendations for the safe prescription of NSAIDs.MethodsRandomised control trials and observational studies published before January 2018 were reviewed, with 329 papers included for the synthesis of evidence-based recommendations.ResultsWhenever possible, a NSAID should be avoided in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, high risk of cardiovascular disease and severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). Before treatment with a NSAID is started, blood pressure should be measured, unrecognised CKD should be screened in high risk cases, and unexplained iron-deficiency anaemia should be investigated. For patients with high cardiovascular risk, and if NSAID treatment cannot be avoided, naproxen or celecoxib are preferred. For patients with a moderate risk of peptic ulcer disease, monotherapy with a non-selective NSAID plus a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), or a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor should be used; for those with a high risk of peptic ulcer disease, a selective COX-2 inhibitor plus PPI are needed. For patients with pre-existing hypertension receiving renin-angiotensin system blockers, empirical addition (or increase in the dose) of an antihypertensive agent of a different class should be considered. Blood pressure and renal function should be monitored in most cases.ConclusionNSAIDs are a valuable armamentarium in clinical medicine, but appropriate recognition of high-risk cases, selection of a specific agent, choice of ulcer prophylaxis and monitoring after therapy are necessary to minimise the risk of adverse events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document