Compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery program in gynecology: are all items of equal importance?

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 810-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basile Pache ◽  
Jonas Jurt ◽  
Fabian Grass ◽  
Martin Hübner ◽  
Nicolas Demartines ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Gynecologic Surgery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Prolonged Length ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines in gynecologic surgery are a set of multiple recommendations based on the best available evidence. However, according to previous studies, maintaining high compliance is challenging in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of compliance to individual ERAS items on clinical outcomes.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained database of 446 consecutive women undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery (both open and minimally invasive) within an ERAS program from 1 October 2013 until 31 January 2017 in a tertiary academic center in Switzerland. Demographics, adherence, and outcomes were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression was performed, with adjustment for confounding factors. Main outcomes were overall compliance, compliance to each individual ERAS item, and impact on post-operative complications according to Clavien classification.ResultsA total of 446 patients were included, 26.2 % (n=117) had at least one complication (Clavien I–V), and 11.4 % (n=51) had a prolonged length of hospital stay. The single independent risk factor for overall complications was intra-operative blood loss > 200 mL (OR 3.32; 95% CI 1.6 to 6.89, p=0.001). Overall compliance >70% with ERAS items (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.66, p=0.12) showed a protective effect on complications. Increased compliance was also associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.435 to 0.93, p=0.001).ConclusionsCompliance >70% with modifiable ERAS items was significantly associated with reduced overall complications. Best possible compliance with all ERAS items is the goal to achieve lower complication rates after gynecologic oncology surgery.

scholarly journals Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery in gynecological operations: a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Nady Abdelrazik ◽  
Ahmad Sameer Sanad
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Gynecologic Surgery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background To investigate the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery on length of hospital stay, pain management, and complication rate. Results The length of hospital stay was reduced in ERAS groups when compared with the control groups (3.46 days vs 2.28 days; P < 0.0001; CI − 1.5767 to − 0.7833 for laparotomy groups and 2.18 vs 1.76 days; P = 0.0115; CI − 0.7439 to − 0.0961 for laparoscopy groups respectively). Intraoperative fluid use was reduced in both ERAS groups compared to the two control groups (934 ± 245 ml and 832 ± 197 ml vs 1747 ± 257 ml and 1459 ± 304 respectively; P < 0.0001) and postoperative fluid use was also less in the ERAS groups compared to the control groups (1606 ± 607 ml and 1210 ± 324 ml vs 2682 ± 396 ml and 1469 ± 315 ml respectively; P < 0.0001). Pain score using visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative day 0 was 4.8 ± 1.4 and 4.1 ± 1.2 (P = 0.0066) for both laparotomy control and ERAS groups respectively, while in the laparoscopy groups, VAS was 3.8 ± 1.1 and 3.2 ± 0.9 (P = 0.0024) in control and ERAS groups respectively. Conclusion Implementation of ERAS protocols in gynecologic surgery was associated with significant reduction in length of hospital stay, associated with decrease intravenous fluids used and comparable pain control without increase in complication rates.

PROPER—PRehabilitatiOn Plus Enhanced Recovery after surgery versus enhanced recovery after surgery in gynecologic oncology: a randomized clinical trial

2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2021-003170
Author(s):  
Andre Lopes ◽  
Alayne Magalhães Trindade Domingues Yamada ◽  
Thais de Campos Cardenas ◽  
Jaqueline Nunes de Carvalho ◽  
Emília de Azevedo Oliveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Functional Capacity ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Preoperative Care ◽  
Gynecologic Surgery ◽  
Calorie Intake ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Gynecological Surgery ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundPrehabilitation is a process that occurs before surgery and aims to improve patient functional capacity and enhance surgical recovery. This process includes medical, nutritional, physical, and psychological interventions that may reduce the duration of hospital stay and provide postoperative physical benefits.Primary ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of a prehabilitation program on postoperative recovery time for patients who will undergo gynecological surgery following the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines.Study HypothesisA multidisciplinary, preoperative prehabilitation program for patients who will undergo gynecological surgery leads to a reduction in the length of hospital stay and improves patient functional capacity.Trial DesignProspective, interventionist, and randomized controlled trial in a 1:1 ratio, open to multidisciplinary team and patients, blinded to surgeons and anesthesiologists. The control group will undergo ERAS standard preoperative care while the intervention group will have ERAS standard preoperative care plus prehabilitation.Major Inclusion CriteriaPatients scheduled to undergo gynecologic surgery performed by laparotomy with a preoperative schedule that allows prehabilitation intervention for 2 to 3 weeks.Primary EndpointTo compare time between surgery and the day the patient is ready for discharge in patients who underwent the prehabilitation process versus those who did not. Readiness for discharge is defined as the ability to take care of one’s-self, to walk alone, and to ingest at least 75% of daily recommended calorie intake.Sample Size194 participantsEstimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsAt present, 30 patients have been recruited. Accrual should be completed by 2023–24.Trial RegistrationThe study is approved by the IBCC – São Camilo Oncologia ethics committee (reference number 4.256.553) and is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04596800).

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for patients undergoing hysterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengyi Ho ◽  
Hui Xian Oh ◽  
Zi An Shian Seah ◽  
Jiemin Zhu ◽  
Hong-Gu HE
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy ◽  
Complication Rates

Background: There is a lack of systematic review exploring the effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in hysterectomy in promoting better recovery. Objectives: To synthesize the best available evidence of the effectiveness of ERAS intervention in promoting better recovery of shortened length of hospital stay (primary outcome), lower readmission, and complication rates (secondary outcomes) among patients undergoing hysterectomy due to benign conditions as compared to conventional perioperative care. Search Strategy: Seven electronic databases were searched from the date of inception to December 2020. Selection Criteria: Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, or quasi-experimental studies published in English examining the effects of ERAS for women diagnosed with benign gynecologic diseases and underwent either abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy were included. Data Collection and Analysis: Two reviewers independently conducted database search, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment. Meta-analyses were performed for all outcomes. The overall quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Main Results: Nine studies were included in this review. Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in length of hospital stay (SMD = -0.76, 95% CI [-1.06, -0.46], Z = 4.72, p < .00001), readmission rate (RR = 0.65, 95% CI [0.44-0.96]; Z = 2.16, p = .03) and complication rate (RR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.48-0.77]; Z = 4.17, p < .0001), with high certainty of evidence. Conclusions: The effectiveness of ERAS in improving recovery indicates that hospitals could adopt the protocol to improve patients’ health and wellbeing. Future studies can focus more on standardizing the protocol’s elements.

RA03.03: THE IMPACT OF ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) ON PATIENTS UNDERGOING OESOPHAGECTOMY

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 23-23
Author(s):  
Barry Dent ◽  
Jillian Sturrock ◽  
Janine Mckenna ◽  
Claire Taylor ◽  
Helen Jaretzke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Multi Disciplinary Team

Abstract Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is defined as a multimodal care pathway designed to achieve early recovery for patients undergoing surgery. For patients undergoing oesophagectomy such pathways are complex and must involve a wide multi-disciplinary team. The importance of peri-operative nutrition is especially relevant in this patient group. We describe our experience of the impact of an ERAS pathway in a high volume oesophago-gastric unit on both short and medium term patient outcomes. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing open 2 phase subtotal oesophagectomy with two field lymphadenectomy in a 12 month period following the introduction of an ERAS pathway were included in the study. Outcomes were compared with consecutive patients undergoing the same procedure over a 12 month period prior to the introduction of the ERAS pathway. All patients were treated in a single UK unit. Adherence to the ERAS pathway was monitored by a dedicated ERAS coordinator. All data were collected prospectively. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous and Chi2 for categorical data. Results 189 patients were included (97 pre-ERAS and 92 ERAS). There were no demographic differences between the patient groups. The rate of severe post-operative complications (Accordion score 3 + ) was identical between groups (29%). Median length of hospital stay was significantly reduced with ERAS (10 days v 14 days pre-ERAS (P < 0.001)) as was the total readmission rate (21% v 39% P = 0.006). Weight loss following surgery was significantly reduced with ERAS. At 2 weeks 1% of patients had lost over 10% of their pre-operative weight compared with 32% pre-ERAS (P < 0.001). A significant difference was maintained at 6 weeks (9% v 55%), 3 months (19% v 66%) and 6 months (35% v 71%). Conclusion Our results demonstrate the positive impact of ERAS for patients undergoing oesophagectomy. Despite no reduction in post-operative complication rates, both hospital stay and readmission rates were reduced, suggesting a positive impact of ERAS on patients’ response to complications. Far fewer patients were readmitted for nutritional reasons/failure to thrive following the introduction of ERAS. Implementing an ERAS pathway requires a dedicated multi-disciplinary team to provide the required peri-operative care both in the hospital and community. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

scholarly journals Safe and effective protocol for discharge 3 days after cardiac surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejia ◽  
Gabrielle Barbosa Borgomoni ◽  
Nilza Lasta ◽  
Mariana Yumi Okada ◽  
Mariana Silva Biason Gomes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Postoperative Stay ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThe Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol affected traditional cardiac surgery processes and COVID-19 is expected to accelerate its scalability. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of an ERAS-based protocol on the length of hospital stay after cardiac surgery. From January 2019 to June 2020, 664 patients underwent consecutive cardiac surgery at a Latin American center. Here, 46 patients were prepared for a rapid recovery through a multidisciplinary institutional protocol based on the ERAS concept, the “TotalCor protocol”. After the propensity score matching, 46 patients from the entire population were adjusted for 12 variables. Patients operated on the TotalCor protocol had reduced intensive care unit time (P < 0.025), postoperative stay (P ≤ 0.001) and length of hospital stay (P ≤ 0.001). In addition, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of complications and death between the two groups. Of the 10-central metrics of TotalCor protocol, 6 had > 70% adherences. In conclusion, the TotalCor protocol was safe and effective for a 3-day discharge after cardiac surgery. Postoperative atrial fibrillation and renal failure were predictors of postoperative stay > 5 days.

565 POST-OPERATIVE WEIGHT LOSS AND OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ESOPHAGECTOMY

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Khaw ◽  
S Munro ◽  
J Sturrock ◽  
H Jaretzke ◽  
S Kamarajah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Failure To Thrive ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Postoperative Weight Loss ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract   Oesophageal cancer is the 11th most common cancer worldwide, with oesophagectomy remaining the mainstay curative treatment, despite significant associated morbidity and mortality. Postoperative weight loss remains a significant problem and is directly correlated to poor prognosis. Measures such as the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme and intraoperative jejunostomy feed have looked to tackle this. This study investigates the impact of these on mortality, length of hospital stay and postoperative weight loss. Methods Patients undergoing oesophagectomy between January 1st 2012—December 2014 and 28th October 2015–December 31st 2019 in a national tertiary oesophagogastric unit were included retrospectively. Variables measured included comorbidities, operation, histopathology, weights (pre- and post-operatively), length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and mortality. Pre-operative body weight was measured at elective admission, and further weights were identified from a prospectively maintained database, during further clinic appointments. Other data was collected through patient notes. Results 594 patients were included. Mean age at diagnosis was 65.9 years (13–65). Majority of cases were adenocarcinoma (63.3%), with varying stages of disease (TX-4, NX-3). Benign pathology accounted for 8.75% of cases. Mean weight loss post-oesophagectomy exceeded 10% at 6 months (SD 14.49). Majority (60.1%) of patients were discharged with feeding jejunostomy, and 5.22% of these required this feed to be restarted post-discharge. Length of stay was mean 16.5 days (SD 22.3). Complications occurred in 68.9% of patients, of which 13.8% were infection driven. Mortality occurred in 26.6% of patients, with 1.83% during hospital admission. 30-day mortality rate was 1.39%. Conclusion Failure to thrive and prolonged weight-loss following oesophagectomy can contribute to poor recovery, with associated complications and poor outcomes, including increased length of stay and mortality. Further analysis of data to investigate association between weight loss and poor outcomes for oesophagectomy patients will allow for personalised treatment of high-risk patients, in conjunction with members of the multidisciplinary team, including dieticians.

scholarly journals Influence of Weekday of Admission and Level of Distress on Length of Hospital Stay in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Brunner ◽  
André Meichtry ◽  
Davy Vancampfort ◽  
Reinhard Imoberdorf ◽  
David Gisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Linear Model ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Complex Problem ◽  
Interdisciplinary Management ◽  
Prolonged Length ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is often a complex problem requiring interdisciplinary management to address patients’ multidimensional needs. The inpatient care for patients with LBP in primary care hospitals is a challenge. In this setting, interdisciplinary LBP management is often unavailable during the weekend. Delays in therapeutic procedures may result in prolonged length of hospital stay (LoS). The impact of delays on LoS might be strongest in patients reporting high levels of psychological distress. Therefore, this study investigates which influence the weekday of admission and distress have on LoS of inpatients with LBP.MethodsRetrospective cohort study conducted between 1 February 2019 and 31 January 2020. ANOVA was used to test the hypothesized difference in mean effects of the weekday of admission on LoS. Further, a linear model was fitted for LoS with distress, categorical weekday of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday), and their interactions.ResultsWe identified 173 patients with LBP. Mean LoS was 7.8 days (SD=5.59). Patients admitted on Friday (mean LoS=10.3) and Saturday (LoS=10.6) had longer stays but not those admitted on Sunday (LoS=7.1). Analysis of the weekday effect (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday) showed that admission on Friday or Saturday was associated with significant increase in LoS compared to admission on other weekdays (t=3.43, p=<0.001). 101 patients (58%) returned questionnaires, and complete data on distress was available from 86 patients (49%). According to a linear model for LoS, the effect of distress on LoS was significantly modified (t=2.51, p=0.014) by dichotomic weekdays of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday).ConclusionsPatients with LBP are hospitalized significantly longer if they have to wait more than two days for interdisciplinary LBP management. This particularly affects patients reporting high distress. Our study provides a platform to further explore whether interdisciplinary LBP management addressing patients’ multidimensional needs reduces LoS in primary care hospitals.

scholarly journals Role and impact of multimodal prehabilitation for gynecologic oncology patients in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1235-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester Miralpeix ◽  
Gemma Mancebo ◽  
Sonia Gayete ◽  
Marta Corcoy ◽  
Josep-Maria Solé-Sedeño
Keyword(s):  
Functional Capacity ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Psychological Support ◽  
Gynecologic Surgery ◽  
Nutritional Counseling ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Operative Recovery ◽  
Eras Protocol

Patients undergoing major surgery are predisposed to a decrease in functional capacity as a response to surgical stress that can delay post-operative recovery. A prehabilitation program consists of patient preparation strategies before surgery, and include pre-operative measures to improve functional capacity and enhance post-operative recovery. Multimodal prehabilitation may include exercise, nutritional counseling, psychological support, and optimization of underlying medical conditions, as well as cessation of unfavorable health behaviors such as smoking and drinking. Currently, there are no standardized guidelines for prehabilitation, and the existent studies are heterogeneous; however, multimodal approaches are likely to have a greater impact on functional outcomes than single management programs. We have reviewed the literature on prehabilitation in general, and in gynecologic surgery in particular, to identify tools to establish an optimal prehabilitation program within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for gynecologic oncology patients. We suggest a safe, reproducible, functional, and easy-to-apply multimodal prehabilitation program for gynecologic oncology practice based on patient-tailored pre-operative medical optimization, physical training, nutritional counseling, and psychological support. The analysis of the prehabilitation program implementation in an ERAS protocol should undergo further research in order to test the efficacy on surgical outcome and recovery after surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document