Managing hereditary breast cancer risk in women with and without ovarian cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 146 (1) ◽  
pp. 205-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Linton Peters ◽  
Judy E. Garber ◽  
Nadine Tung
Author(s):  
Carrie A. Miller ◽  
Alesha N. Henderson ◽  
Jeanine P. D. Guidry ◽  
Kandace P. McGuire ◽  
Bernard F. Fuemmeler

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Jingsong Zhao ◽  
Colleen M. McBride ◽  
Yue Guan

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> In this brief report, we ask whether women’s interpretation of breast cancer risk based on their low likelihood of carrying a <i>BRCA1/2</i> mutation is associated with their information-sharing behavior, and whether misinterpretation is associated with motives for sharing the result. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Women in mammography clinics who completed a brief family history assessment and deemed to be at low likelihood of carrying a <i>BRCA1/2</i> mutation were asked to complete a 1-time online survey between June 2016 and January 2017. <b><i>Results:</i></b> One-third (44/148) of women shared their family history screen result with someone in their social network. Result information was shared largely with a first-degree female relative to express feelings of relief (77%, 33/43). There were no differences in likelihood of sharing based on breast cancer risk interpretation. However, women who misinterpreted the implications of the result for general breast cancer risk reported more motives to share the result with their social network than those who accurately interpreted their breast cancer risk. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> As family history-based screening for hereditary breast cancer is broadly implemented, the communication needs of the majority of women who will be unlikely of carrying a <i>BRCA1/2</i> mutation must be considered. The motives of women who misinterpreted the implications of this result for breast cancer risk suggest the possibility that miscommunication could be spread to the broader family network.


2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 994-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen A. Shih ◽  
Fergus J. Couch ◽  
Katherine L. Nathanson ◽  
M. Anne Blackwood ◽  
Timothy R. Rebbeck ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in families identified in a breast cancer risk evaluation clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-four families seeking breast cancer risk evaluation were screened for coding region mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis and DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Mutations were identified in 37 families (22.6%); 28 (17.1%) had BRCA1 mutations and nine (5.5%) had BRCA2 mutations. The Ashkenazi Jewish founder mutations 185delAG and 5382insC (BRCA1) were found in 10 families (6.1%). However, 6174delT (BRCA2) was found in only one family (0.6%) despite estimates of equal frequency in the Ashkenazi population. In contrast to other series, the average age of breast cancer diagnosis was earlier in BRCA2 mutation carriers (32.1 years) than in women with BRCA1 mutations (37.6 years, P = .028). BRCA1 mutations were detected in 20 (45.5%) of 44 families with ovarian cancer and 12 (75%) of 16 families with both breast and ovarian cancer in a single individual. Significantly fewer BRCA2 mutations (two [4.5%] of 44) were detected in families with ovarian cancer (P = .01). Eight families had male breast cancer; one had a BRCA1 mutation and three had BRCA2 mutations. CONCLUSION: BRCA1 mutations were three times more prevalent than BRCA2 mutations. Breast cancer diagnosis before 50 years of age, ovarian cancer, breast and ovarian cancer in a single individual, and male breast cancer were all significantly more common in families with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, but none of these factors distinguished between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Evidence for reduced breast cancer penetrance associated with the BRCA2 mutation 6174delT was noted.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangyu Ma ◽  
Qiuyin Cai ◽  
Ryan J. Delahanty ◽  
Xiao-Ou Shu ◽  
Ben Zhang ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 895-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon ◽  
Shih-Chen Chang ◽  
Michael F Leitzmann ◽  
Karen A Johnson ◽  
Christine Johnson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document