Aggression, glucocorticoids, and the chronic costs of status competition for wild male chimpanzees

2021 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 104965
Author(s):  
Martin N. Muller ◽  
Drew K. Enigk ◽  
Stephanie A. Fox ◽  
Jordan Lucore ◽  
Zarin P. Machanda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Surbeck ◽  
Tobias Deschner ◽  
Anja Weltring ◽  
Gottfried Hohmann

Author(s):  
Will G. Russell ◽  
Michelle Hegmon
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Persinger ◽  
Jane Lundgren

Offspring of 6 wild, male (brown-coated) dump rats ( Rattus norvegicus) and laboratory albino females were compared with the offspring of albino rats on several tissue and muricide measures. At weaning, the 48 hybrid pups (all brown-coated), both vocalized and bit the experimenters' gloves; these behaviors were not apparent in the 40 albino pups. Adult hybrid rats did not kill significantly more mice than albino controls. Although hybrid rats had significantly lighter (ω2 = 55%) wet thyroid weights than albinos, they did not differ in spleen, thymus, adrenal, or body weights.


2018 ◽  
pp. 369-392
Author(s):  
Richard H. McAdams

This paper examines the relationship between positive and normative economic theories of discrimination, that is, what discrimination is and why law should prohibit it. Prior economic scholarship has modelled discrimination as the result of (a) a taste for non-association; (b) statistically rational generalizations; and (c) group-based status competition. I examine these theories along with the psychological theory of implicit bias and other types of irrational stereotypes. For each positive theory, I explore the normative implications. The taste-based and statistical theories do not match well with antidiscrimination law, though the status theory potentially does.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document