Study of circular RNA translation using reporter systems in living cells

Methods ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuyun Chen ◽  
Yun Yang ◽  
Zefeng Wang
Methods ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Si-Kun Guo ◽  
Fang Nan ◽  
Chu-Xiao Liu ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
Ling-Ling Chen

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (19) ◽  
pp. E2579-E2588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna P. Adamala ◽  
Daniel A. Martin-Alarcon ◽  
Edward S. Boyden

The ability to monitor and perturb RNAs in living cells would benefit greatly from a modular protein architecture that targets unmodified RNA sequences in a programmable way. We report that the RNA-binding protein PumHD (Pumilio homology domain), which has been widely used in native and modified form for targeting RNA, can be engineered to yield a set of four canonical protein modules, each of which targets one RNA base. These modules (which we call Pumby, for Pumilio-based assembly) can be concatenated in chains of varying composition and length, to bind desired target RNAs. The specificity of such Pumby–RNA interactions was high, with undetectable binding of a Pumby chain to RNA sequences that bear three or more mismatches from the target sequence. We validate that the Pumby architecture can perform RNA-directed protein assembly and enhancement of translation of RNAs. We further demonstrate a new use of such RNA-binding proteins, measurement of RNA translation in living cells. Pumby may prove useful for many applications in the measurement, manipulation, and biotechnological utilization of unmodified RNAs in intact cells and systems.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Kan Chen ◽  
Ran Cheng ◽  
Janos Demeter ◽  
Jin Chen ◽  
Shira Weingarten-Gabbay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Chang ◽  
Gang Ma ◽  
Edwin Cheung ◽  
Andrew P. Hutchins

AbstractRNA N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant mRNA modification, and forms part of an epitranscriptomic system that modulates RNA function. RNA modifications can be reversibly catalyzed by several specific enzymes, and those modifications can be recognized by RNA binding proteins that in turn regulate biological processes. Although there are many reports demonstrating m6A participation in critical biological functions, this exploration has mainly been conducted through the global knockout or knockdown of the writers, erasers, or readers of m6A. Consequently, there is a lack of information about the role of m6A on single transcripts in biological processes, posing a challenge in understanding the biological functions of m6A. Here, we demonstrate a CRISPR/dCas13a-based RNA m6A-editor which can target mRNAs using single crRNA or multiple crRNAs array to methylate or demethylate m6A. We systematically assay its capabilities to enable the targeted rewriting of m6A dynamics, including modulation of circular RNA translation and transcript half-life. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of the system by specifically modulating XIST m6A levels, which can control X chromosome silencing and activation. Based on our editors, m6A on single and multiple transcripts can be modified to allow the exploration of the role of m6A on in biological processes.


Science ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 352 (6292) ◽  
pp. 1425-1429 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Morisaki ◽  
K. Lyon ◽  
K. F. DeLuca ◽  
J. G. DeLuca ◽  
B. P. English ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Lyon ◽  
Luis U. Aguilera ◽  
Tatsuya Morisaki ◽  
Brian Munsky ◽  
Timothy J. Stasevich

ABSTRACTRibosomal frameshifting during the translation of RNA is implicated in both human disease and viral infection. While previous work has uncovered many mechanistic details about single RNA frameshifting kineticsin vitro, very little is known about how single RNA frameshift in living systems. To confront this problem, we have developed technology to quantify live-cell single RNA translation dynamics in frameshifted open reading frames. Applying this technology to RNA encoding the HIV-1 frameshift sequence reveals a small subset (~8%) of the translating pool robustly frameshift in living cells. Frameshifting RNA are preferentially in multi-RNA “translation factories,” are translated at about the same rate as non-frameshifting RNA (~2 aa/sec), and can continuously frameshift for more than four rounds of translation. Fits to a bursty model of frameshifting constrain frameshifting kinetic rates and demonstrate how ribosomal traffic jams contribute to the persistence of the frameshifting state. These data provide novel insight into retroviral frameshifting and could lead to new strategies to perturb the process in living cells.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingqing Miao ◽  
Bing Ni ◽  
Jun Tang

The circular (circ)RNAs are a newly recognized group of noncoding (nc)RNAs. Research to characterize the functional features of circRNAs has uncovered distinctive profiles of conservation, stability, specificity and complexity. However, a new line of evidence has indicated that although circRNAs can function as ncRNAs, such as in the role of miRNA sponges, they are also capable of coding proteins. To date, several circRNAs have been verified to be able to translate proteins or peptides with functions that mainly influence the functions of their maternal genes. These findings greatly broaden our research approach and the knowledge of ncRNAs, meanwhile these findings also raise questions about whether circRNA is still classified as non-coding RNA. Here, we systematically summarize the history and evidence for the translation of circRNAs, including the evolution implications, molecular structures, regulation and mechanism, experimental validation and computational prediction for the coding ability of circRNAs.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingqing Miao ◽  
Bing Ni ◽  
Jun Tang

The circular (circ)RNAs are a newly recognized group of noncoding (nc)RNAs. Research to characterize the functional features of circRNAs has uncovered distinctive profiles of conservation, stability, specificity and complexity. However, a new line of evidence has indicated that although circRNAs can function as ncRNAs, such as in the role of miRNA sponges, they are also capable of coding proteins. To date, several circRNAs have been verified to be able to translate proteins or peptides with functions that mainly influence the functions of their maternal genes. These findings greatly broaden our research approach and the knowledge of ncRNAs, meanwhile these findings also raise questions about whether circRNA is still classified as non-coding RNA. Here, we systematically summarize the history and evidence for the translation of circRNAs, including the evolution implications, molecular structures, regulation and mechanism, experimental validation and computational prediction for the coding ability of circRNAs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document