Intrinsic Breast Tumor Subtypes, Race, and Long-Term Survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 70-72
Author(s):  
Y. Gong
2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (24) ◽  
pp. 6100-6110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie M. O'Brien ◽  
Stephen R. Cole ◽  
Chiu-Kit Tse ◽  
Charles M. Perou ◽  
Lisa A. Carey ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 163 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Conway ◽  
Sharon N. Edmiston ◽  
Eloise Parrish ◽  
Christopher Bryant ◽  
Chiu-Kit Tse ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9510-9510 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. Carey ◽  
C. M. Perou ◽  
L. G. Dressler ◽  
C. A. Livasy ◽  
J. Geradts ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 921-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Conway ◽  
Sharon N. Edmiston ◽  
Chiu-Kit Tse ◽  
Christopher Bryant ◽  
Pei Fen Kuan ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9510-9510 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. Carey ◽  
C. M. Perou ◽  
L. G. Dressler ◽  
C. A. Livasy ◽  
J. Geradts ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Walsh ◽  
Suleyman Gulsuner ◽  
Ming K. Lee ◽  
Melissa A. Troester ◽  
Andrew F. Olshan ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS) phases I–II was a case-control study of biological and social risk factors for invasive breast cancer that enrolled cases and controls between 1993 and 1999. Case selection was population-based and stratified by ancestry and age at diagnosis. Controls were matched to cases by age, self-identified race, and neighborhood of residence. Sequencing genomic DNA from 1370 cases and 1635 controls yielded odds ratios (with 95% confidence limits) for breast cancer of all subtypes of 26.7 (3.59, 189.1) for BRCA1, 8.8 (3.44, 22.48) for BRCA2, and 9.0 (2.06, 39.60) for PALB2; and for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) of 55.0 (7.01, 431.4) for BRCA1, 12.1 (4.18, 35.12) for BRCA2, and 10.8 (1.97, 59.11) for PALB2. Overall, 5.6% of patients carried a pathogenic variant in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, or TP53, the four most highly penetrant breast cancer genes. Analysis of cases by tumor subtype revealed the expected association of TNBC versus other tumor subtypes with BRCA1, and suggested a significant association between TNBC versus other tumor subtypes with BRCA2 or PALB2 among African-American (AA) patients [2.95 (1.18, 7.37)], but not among European-American (EA) patients [0.62 (0.18, 2.09)]. AA patients with pathogenic variants in BRCA2 or PALB2 were 11 times more likely to be diagnosed with TNBC versus another tumor subtype than were EA patients with pathogenic variants in either of these genes (P = 0.001). If this pattern is confirmed in other comparisons of similarly ascertained AA and EA breast cancer patients, it could in part explain the higher prevalence of TNBC among AA breast cancer patients.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3390
Author(s):  
Mats Enlund

Retrospective studies indicate that cancer survival may be affected by the anaesthetic technique. Propofol seems to be a better choice than volatile anaesthetics, such as sevoflurane. The first two retrospective studies suggested better long-term survival with propofol, but not for breast cancer. Subsequent retrospective studies from Asia indicated the same. When data from seven Swedish hospitals were analysed, including 6305 breast cancer patients, different analyses gave different results, from a non-significant difference in survival to a remarkably large difference in favour of propofol, an illustration of the innate weakness in the retrospective design. The largest randomised clinical trial, registered on clinicaltrial.gov, with survival as an outcome is the Cancer and Anesthesia study. Patients are here randomised to propofol or sevoflurane. The inclusion of patients with breast cancer was completed in autumn 2017. Delayed by the pandemic, one-year survival data for the cohort were presented in November 2020. Due to the extremely good short-term survival for breast cancer, one-year survival is of less interest for this disease. As the inclusions took almost five years, there was also a trend to observe. Unsurprisingly, no difference was found in one-year survival between the two groups, and the trend indicated no difference either.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document