scholarly journals Does Screening Colonoscopy at an Earlier Age in Asymptomatic Patients With Family History of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Improve Polyp and Colon Cancer Detection Rate?

2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
pp. S-560-S-561
Author(s):  
Naeem Aslam ◽  
Marc F. Catalano ◽  
Robbie Taha ◽  
Nalini M. Guda ◽  
Joseph E. Geenen
2012 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunyoung Cho ◽  
Jung Eun Lee ◽  
Eric B Rimm ◽  
Charles S Fuchs ◽  
Edward L Giovannucci

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Margolies ◽  
A. Cohen ◽  
E. Sonnenblick ◽  
J. Mandeli ◽  
P. H. Schmidt ◽  
...  

Objectives. To study factors that predict changes in management with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Methods. The Institutional Review Board approved this HIPAA compliant study. 996 patients had DBT with full field digital mammography (FFDM). Univariate analysis evaluated predictors of management change and cancer detection. Results. DBT changed management in 109 of 996 (11%); 77 (71%) required less imaging. Recalled patients after abnormal FFDM screen were most likely to have management change—25% (24 of 97 patients) compared to 8% (13/163) of symptomatic patients and 10% (72/736) of screening patients (P<0.001). Dense breasted patients had a higher likelihood of having DBT change management: 13% (68/526) compared to 9% (41/470) (P=0.03). Of the 996 patients, 19 (2%) were diagnosed with breast cancer. 15 cancers (83%) were seen on FFDM and DBT; 3 (17%) were diagnosed after DBT (0.3%, 95%CI: 0.1–0.9%). One recurrence was in the skin and was not seen on DBT nor was it seen on FFDM. The increase in cancer detection rate was 17% for asymptomatic patients, 0% for symptomatic patients, and 100% for recalled patients. Conclusions. DBT increased cancer detection rate by 20% and decreased the recall rate in 8–25%. Advances in Knowledge. DBT led to a doubling of the cancer detection rate in recalled patients.


1991 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 763-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin A. Luchtefeld ◽  
Dale Syverson ◽  
Mark Solfelt ◽  
John M. MacKeigan ◽  
Randall Krystosek ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 533-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Eun Song ◽  
Nariya Cho ◽  
Jung Min Chang ◽  
A Jung Chu ◽  
Ann Yi ◽  
...  

Background Supplemental breast ultrasonography (US) has been used as a surveillance imaging method in women with personal history of breast cancer (PHBC). However, there have been limited data regarding diagnostic performances. Purpose To evaluate diagnostic performances of supplemental breast US screening for women with PHBC and to compare with those for women without PHBC. Material and Methods Between 2011 and 2012, 12,230 supplemental US exams were performed in 12,230 women with negative mammograms: 6584 women with PHBC and 5646 women without PHBC. Cancer detection rate, interval cancer rate, abnormal interpretation rate, positive predictive values (PPVs), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared. Results Overall cancer detection rate and first-year interval cancer rate were 1.80/1000 exams and 0.91/1000 negative exams, both of which were higher in women with PHBC than in women without PHBC (2.88 vs. 0.53 per 1000, P = 0.003; 1.50 vs. 0.20 per 1000, P = 0.027). Abnormal interpretation rate was lower in the women with PHBC than in women without PHBC (9.1% vs. 12.1%, P < 0.001). Sensitivity was not different (67.9% vs. 75.0%, P = 1.000), whereas specificity and PPV3 were higher in women with PHBC than in women without PHBC (91.2% vs. 88.0%, P < 0.001; 22.6% vs. 3.1%, P < 0.001). The majority of detected cancers in women with PHBC (78.9%, 15/19) were stage 0 or 1. Conclusion Supplemental breast US screening increases early stage second breast cancers with high specificity and PPV3 in women with PHBC, however, high interval cancer rate in younger women with PHBC should be noted.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire L. Jansson-Knodell ◽  
Nathan R. Foster ◽  
Daniel J. Sargent ◽  
Paul J. Limburg ◽  
Stephen N. Thibodeau ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document