Screening colonoscopy for family history of colorectal cancer: A growing consensus

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 425-427
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Lynch
2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-220
Author(s):  
Nastazja D. Pilonis ◽  
Marek Bugajski ◽  
Paulina Wieszczy ◽  
Robert Franczyk ◽  
Joanna Didkowska ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 791-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengzhu Jiang ◽  
Maida J Sewitch ◽  
Lawrence Joseph ◽  
Alan N Barkun

BACKGROUND: Polypectomy rate is a surrogate quality indicator for screening colonoscopy. Various methods for identifying screening colonoscopies have been used and it is unclear how different definitions affect the estimated polypectomy rate.OBJECTIVE: To estimate polypectomy rates and how they vary according to the definition of a screening colonoscopy, using patient- and endoscopist-reported indications.METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of endoscopists and their patients 50 to 75 years of age who underwent colonoscopy was conducted. Based on questionnaire responses, four patient indications were derived: perceived screening; perceived nonscreening; medical history indicating nonscreening; and combination of the three indications. Endoscopist indication was derived from a questionnaire completed immediately after colonoscopy. Polypectomy status was obtained from provincial physician billing records. Polypectomy rates were computed, while accounting for physician and hospital level clustering, using all four patient indications, endoscopist indication, and the agreement between patient and endoscopist indications. The effect of indications on polypectomy rate was estimated adjusting for age, sex and family history of colorectal cancer.RESULTS: A total of 2134 patients and 45 endoscopists were included. The proportion of colonoscopies classified as screening according to the nine indications ranged from 32.2% to 70.9%. Polypectomy rates ranged between 22.6% and 26.2% for screening colonoscopy, and between 27.1% and 30.8% for nonscreening colonoscopy. Adjusted ORs for indication ranged between 0.74 and 0.94.DISCUSSION: Although the proportion of colonoscopies identified as screening varied considerably among the indications, the estimated polypectomy rates were similar.CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the way screening is defined does not greatly affect the estimates of polypectomy rate.


Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 631
Author(s):  
Karin Alvarez ◽  
Alessandra Cassana ◽  
Marjorie De La Fuente ◽  
Tamara Canales ◽  
Mario Abedrapo ◽  
...  

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent neoplasm in Chile and its mortality rate is rising in all ages. However, studies characterizing CRC according to the age of onset are still lacking. This study aimed to identify clinical, pathological, and molecular features of CRC in Chilean patients according to the age of diagnosis: early- (≤50 years; EOCRC), intermediate- (51–69 years; IOCRC), and late-onset (≥70 years; LOCRC). The study included 426 CRC patients from Clinica Las Condes, between 2007 and 2019. A chi-square test was applied to explore associations between age of onset and clinicopathological characteristics. Body Mass Index (BMI) differences according to age of diagnosis was evaluated through t-test. Overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. We found significant differences between the age of onset, and gender, BMI, family history of cancer, TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors stage, OS, and CSS. EOCRC category was characterized by a family history of cancer, left-sided tumors with a more advanced stage of the disease but better survival at 10 years, and lower microsatellite instability (MSI), with predominant germline mutations. IOCRC has shown clinical similarities with the EOCRC and molecular similarities to the LOCRC, which agrees with other reports.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 967-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharati Bapat ◽  
Noralane M. Lindor ◽  
John Baron ◽  
Kim Siegmund ◽  
Lin Li ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-162-S-163
Author(s):  
Anthony Razzak ◽  
Kelly Yu ◽  
Paul Pinsky ◽  
Tom Riley ◽  
Robert E. Schoen

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 917-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel D. Buchanan ◽  
Aung K. Win ◽  
Michael D. Walsh ◽  
Rhiannon J. Walters ◽  
Mark Clendenning ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document