Clinical Significance of Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) in Melanoma: A Narrative Review from Adjuvant Clinical Trials

Cutaneous melanoma is the most dangerous skin cancer, with high death rates in advanced stages. To assess the impact of each treatment on patient outcomes, most studies use relapse-free survival (RFS) as a primary endpoint and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) as a secondary endpoint. The aim of this narrative review of the main adjuvant studies for resected stage III/IV melanoma, with a specific focus on DMFS, is to evaluate DMFS trends and their potential association with RFS, identify which treatments are possibly associated with better outcomes in terms of DMFS and their potential predictive factors, and discuss DMFS trends in terms of patient management in daily practice. We outline the impact of each available treatment option on DMFS and RFS according to the years of follow-up and compare data from different studies. Overall, the trends of DMFS closely follow those of RFS, with most patients relapsing at visceral rather than regional sites. As it captures the burden of patients who develop distant relapse, DMFS could be considered a primary endpoint, in addition to RFS, in adjuvant trials, identifying patients whose relapse is associated with a worse prognosis and who may need further systemic treatment.

542 Randomized trial of tumor lysate particle only vaccine vs. tumor lysate particle-loaded, dendritic cell vaccine to prevent recurrence of resected stage III/IV melanoma: 36-month analysis

BackgroundThe tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine is an autologous tumor vaccine that decreased recurrence in stage III/IV melanoma when granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was not used to harvest the dendritic cells in a randomized phase 2B adjuvant trial.1The tumor lysate (TL) particle only (TLPO) vaccine utilizes a similar mechanism, but with autologous TL-loaded yeast cell wall particles; this eliminates the need for dendritic cell (DC) collection and ex-vivo loading and reduces production costs and time. The TLPO vaccine was compared to TLPLDC in an embedded bridging portion of the trial. Here, we examine 36-month outcomes of the ongoing randomized, double-blind phase 2 trial in patients (pts) with resected stage III/IV melanoma.MethodsPts were randomized 2:1 to receive TLPO or TLPLDC as a continuation of a previously established clinical trial comparing TLPLDC versus placebo. The TLPLDC group was analyzed separately based on use (or not) of G-CSF for collection of DC. Safety was measured by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis was used to compare 36-month disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) main arms as well as pre-specified subgroups.ResultsA total of 187 pts were randomized with 41, 47, 56, and 43 pts enrolled in the placebo, TLPLDC without G-CSF (TLPLDC), TLPLDC with G-CSF (TLPLDC+G), and TLPO arm, respectively. Pts randomized to the TLPO arm were more likely to have stage IV melanoma (22.0% for placebo, 20.4% for TLPLDC and TLPLDC+G, and 44.2% for TLPO; p = 0.002) and to receive prior immunotherapy (36.6% for placebo, 39.8% for both TLPLDC and TLPLDC+G, and 83.7% for TLPO; p < 0.001). Grade 3+ adverse events were not significantly different between arms. In the ITT analysis, 36-month DFS was 30.0% for placebo, 55.8% for TLPLDC, 24.4% for TLPLDC+G, and 64.0% for TLPO (p < 0.001). OS at 36 months was 70.9% for placebo, 94.2% for TLPLDC, 69.8%% for TLPLDC+G, and 94.8% for TLPO (p = 0.011) (figure 1).Abstract 542 Figure 1Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrating DFS (A) and OS (B) between Placebo (n=41), TLPLDC (n=47), TLPLDC+G (n=56), and TLPO (n=43)ConclusionsThe TLPO and TLPLDC (without G-CSF) vaccines improved 36-month DFS and OS in this randomized phase 2 trial. The efficacy of the TLPO and TLPLDC vaccines will be confirmed in a phase III trial in resected Stage III/IV melanoma pts.Trial RegistrationNIH, clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02301611ReferencesO’Shea AE, Chick RC, Clifton GT, et al. The effect of pretreatment with G-CSF prior to dendritic cell collection during the phase IIb trial of an autologous DC-based vaccine for advanced, resectable melanoma. Presented at: Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer 35th Anniversary Annual Meeting & Preconference Programs (SITC 2020); November 11–14, 2020. Abstract 310. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(Suppl 3):A656–A959.Ethics ApprovalThe clinical trial protocol was approved by the Western Institutional Review Board (2014–1932). All participants provided informed consent prior to enrollment in the trial.

308 Transcriptomic analysis of melanoma patients in adjuvant setting treated with anti PD1 therapy: real life study

BackgroundAdjuvant treatment of melanoma patients with immune-checkpoint inhibition (ICI) significantly improved relapse-free survival (RFS).1 In the phase 3 keynote-054 trial showed that pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) administration in adjuvant setting provided a longer RFS (59,8%) than the placebo group (41,4%) at a 3.5-year median follow-up.2 Moreover, 4 years RFS results from the phase 3 checkmate 238 trial, showed a superior efficacy of nivolumab versus ipilimumab in patients with resected AJCC-7 stage III or IV melanoma. RFS rate was of 58% in the nivolumab arm and 45% in the ipilimumab arm.3 Although treatment with ICIs has improved the RFS of melanoma patients in adjuvant setting, there is still a large proportion of patients who do not respond to the treatment and then relapse. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to anti-PD1 treatment in the adjuvant setting.MethodsFrom December 2018 to July 2020, n. 121 melanoma patients in stage III or IV NED were treated with anti-PD1s as adjuvant (minimum follow up of 12 months, range 12–30 months). These patients received nivolumab (n=95) or pembrolizumab (n=26). Distant and local metastases was observed in 33 (27%) and 7 (6%) patients, respectively (patients baseline characteristics are listed in table1). Gene expression profiles, using NanoString IO 360 panel, were performed from peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMCs), collected retrospectively, from n.73 patients (of which n.26 had relapse). All patients have appropriately signed informed consent. Statistical analysis was performed via Bonferroni correction, P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant for median stratification.ResultsAt a minimum follow-up of 12 months, the 12-month rate of Relapse-free survival was 72%, confirming the data reported by checkmate 238 trial. In the transcriptomic analysis we observed that in patients with local-regional metastases there was a higher expression of ITGA2 (p<0.05), a gene that promotes malignant tumor aggression by up-regulating PD-L1 expression through STAT3 pathway and the downregulation of DUSP1 (p<0.05) that is linked in promotion of angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis. Moreover, in male group we found a higher expression of HLA-DQB1 and HLA-DQA1 which belonged to HLA class II beta chains.Abstract 308 Table 1ConclusionsIn this preliminary report we found that RFS 1-yr rate is similar to checkmate 238 study, and that patients with local metastasis have a higher expression of genes related to promote PDL1 levels. Further investigations are needed to get additional information.AcknowledgementsThe study was supported by the Institutional Project ”Ricerca Corrente” of Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione ”G. Pascale” of Napoli, Italy.ReferencesWeber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, et al, CheckMate 238 Collaborators. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N Engl J Med 2017 November 9;377(19):1824–1835.Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandalà M, et al. EORTC melanoma group. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): distant metastasis-free survival results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021 May;22(5):643–654.Ascierto PA, Del Vecchio M, Mandalá M, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage IIIB-C and stage IV melanoma (CheckMate 238): 4-year results from a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2020 November;21(11):1465–1477.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by internal ethics board of the Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione ”G. Pascale” of Napoli Italy, approval number of registry 33/17 OSS.ConsentWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

The Influence of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Dose Intensity on Five-Year Outcomes in Resected Colon Cancer: A Single Centre Retrospective Analysis

There is evidence that achieving a dose intensity > 80% in adjuvant colon cancer treatment improves survival. In total, 192 consecutive patients with resected stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer that received adjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who received at least 6 weeks of adjuvant therapy were included. The primary objective was to assess the influence of dose index (DI) and relative dose intensity (RDI) on DFS and OS at 3 and 5 years in patients receiving fluorouracil-based doublet therapy with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)(5-FU and oxaliplatin assessed separately), or capecitabine monotherapy. In the capecitabine group, DFS rates for 3 and 5 years were 66.7% and 57.6%, respectively, while OS rates were 80.3% and 66.7%, respectively. Those who received FOLFOX had DFS rates of 76.9% and 71.2% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. OS rates were 86.4% and 76.7% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Median RDI was 73.8% for capecitabine and 76.3% and 85.6% for the oxaliplatin and 5-FU components respectively. Based on a multivariate analysis in patients receiving FOLFOX, those with an oxaliplatin DI > 80% had improvements in DFS and OS compared to those with an oxaliplatin DI of ≤ 80%. Otherwise, there was no significant difference in DFS or OS when comparing patients who achieved an RDI or a DI of above versus below 80% in the patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer.

The result of adjuvant Vinorelbine plus Cisplatin in completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer at Hanoi Medical Unoversity Hospital

Background: Assess clinical, subclinical characteristics of stage IB-IIIA non - small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC). Evaluating the result of adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin in completely resected stage IB - IIIA NSCLC. Methods: Descriptive study of 70 patients completely resected stage IB - IIIA non - small cell lung cancer were received adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin chemotherapy at Hanoi Medical University Hospital from 01/2016 to 6/2020. Results: The mean age of 56.94 years old, male: female ratio was 2.9:1. 23 (32.8%) patients had postoperative stage IB disease, 24 (34.3%) had stage IIA disease, 13 (18.6%) had stage IIB disease and 10 (14.3%) had stage IIIA disease. The major histological type was adenocarcinoma (78.6%). Median disease free survival was 29.10 ± 1.63 months, and 3 - year survival was 41%. Chemotherapy caused hematologic side effects in 66.67% of patients including neutropenia in 61.4% and grade 3/4 neutropenia in 28.1%. Non - hematologic toxic effects of chemotherapy were reported at low rates and almost mild (grade 1/2). Conclusions: The vinorelbine - cisplatin regimen is an effective regimen in the adjuvant treatment of non - small cell lung cancer, the study showed that the results in disease - free survival and overall survival were comparable to those of other studies in the world. The most common side effect was neutropenia, the other side effects were reported at low rate and usually mild.