965 Facilitating Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: The “Suture-Pulley” Method Significantly Improves Procedure Time and Minimizes Technical Difficulty Compared to Conventional Technique

2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. S-174-S-175
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Aihara ◽  
Nitin Kumar ◽  
Christopher C. Thompson
Endoscopy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (06) ◽  
pp. 606-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taku Sakamoto ◽  
Yutaka Saito ◽  
Fumihiko Nakamura ◽  
Seiichiro Abe ◽  
Hiroyuki Takamaru ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although submucosal dissection is useful for treating laterally spreading colorectal tumors, there is little information regarding the endoscopic treatment of large protruding colorectal neoplasms. Here, we aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for protruding colorectal neoplasms ≥ 20 mm in diameter. Methods In total, 112 consecutive patients undergoing treatment between January 2005 and June 2017 were enrolled retrospectively. The study period was divided into six periods to evaluate any changes in outcomes over time. We reviewed all short-term clinical outcomes, including lesion characteristics, procedure time, and percentages of en bloc resection, curative resection, adverse events, and treatment discontinuation. Results The percentages of en bloc, en bloc R0, and en bloc curative resections were 88 %, 82 %, and 59 %, respectively. Perforation occurred in 11 patients (10 %), and the endoscopic procedure was discontinued in five patients (4 %) because of technical difficulty. For lesions ≥ 40 mm in diameter, the procedure time showed a statistically significant decreasing trend in the latter half of the study period. However, the rate of cure did not improve along with enhancements to the procedure’s technological aspects. Conclusions Although endoscopic submucosal dissection for large protruding lesions has advanced in terms of its technical aspects, its ability to cure large protruding neoplasms has not shown gratifying results.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironori Konuma ◽  
Kenshi Matsumoto ◽  
Hiroya Ueyama ◽  
Hiroyuki Komori ◽  
Yoichi Akazawa ◽  
...  

Background. Previous assessments of technical difficulty and procedure time for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric neoplasms did not take into account several critical determinants of these parameters. However, two key phases of ESD determine the total procedure time: the mucosal circumference incision speed (CIS) and submucosal dissection speed (SDS). Methods. We included 302 cases of en bloc and R0 resection of gastric neoplasms performed by 10 operators who had completed the training program at our hospital. Twelve locations were classified based on multiple criteria, such as condition of surrounding mucosa, lesion vascularity, presence of submucosal fat, ulcers, scars, fibrosis, and scope and device maneuverability. Lesions in different locations were classified into three groups based on the length of the procedure: fast, moderate, or late. Results. A significant difference was found in CIS and SDS for each location (p<0.01), which demonstrates the validity of this classification system. In several locations, CIS and SDS were not consistent with each other. Conclusion. CIS and SDS did not correspond to each other even for lesions in the same location. Consideration of ESD procedure time for gastric neoplasms requires a more elaborate classification system than that previously reported.


Endoscopy ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (05) ◽  
pp. 422-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Aihara ◽  
Marvin Ryou ◽  
Nitin Kumar ◽  
Michele Ryan ◽  
Christopher Thompson

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 2909-2915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiromasa Hazama ◽  
Masaki Tanaka ◽  
Naomi Kakushima ◽  
Yohei Yabuuchi ◽  
Masao Yoshida ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document