Tu1776 Anorectal Neuropathy and Anal Sphincter Defects: Independent or Associated Risk Factors in Fecal Incontinence

2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S941-S942
Author(s):  
Tanisa Patcharatrakul ◽  
Mercedes Amieva-Balmori ◽  
Amol Sharma ◽  
Annie DeWitt ◽  
Satish S. Rao
Author(s):  
Nuring Pangastuti ◽  
Junizaf Junizaf ◽  
Ibnu Pranoto ◽  
Budi I Santoso ◽  
Tyas Priyatini

Objective: To compare the incidence of persistent sonographic anal sphincter defect, fecal urgency, anal and fecal incontinence after IIIb- IV degree perineal rupture repair using overlapping and end-to-end technique. Method: An open clinical trial with randomization was carried out in July 2010-April 2012. The population consisted of the patients who underwent vaginal delivery in Dr. Sardjito Central General Hospital, Sleman District General Hospital, as well as Tegalrejo, Jetis and Mergangsan Community Health Centers who did no have complaints of fecal urgency, anal incontinence, and/or fecal incontinence, and suffered IIIb-IV degree perineal rupture repaired within less than 24 hours of rupture. The exclusion criteria included conditions in which patients could not undergo repair at the moment (shock, uncooperative patient). Fourty-eight research samples were divided into 2 groups, 24 samples for each of the treatment group (overlapping repair) and the control group (end-to-end repair). Local anesthesia was performed in a pudendal-block manner. Result: Success of the repair was assessed based on the presence of persistent sonographic anal sphincter defects in the 6-week evaluation after repair. Successful repair was higher in the overlapping group than that of the end-to-end group (94.74% vs 81.25%, p=0.31). Clinically and based on the Fecal Continence Scoring Scale (FCSS), evaluation at weeks II and VI indicated successful repair in both groups. Conclusion: There was no difference in the incidence of persistent sonographic anal sphincter defects, fecal urgency, anal incontinence, and fecal incontinence, after IIIb-IV degree perineal rupture repair using overlapping technique in comparison with end-to-end technique. Keywords: end-to-end technique, III-IV degree perineal rupture, obstetric perineal rupture, overlapping technique


Radiology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 236 (3) ◽  
pp. 886-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maaike P. Terra ◽  
Regina G. H. Beets-Tan ◽  
Victor P. M. van Der Hulst ◽  
Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf ◽  
Patrick M. M. Bossuyt ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 242 (2) ◽  
pp. 463-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette C. Dobben ◽  
Maaike P. Terra ◽  
J. Frederik M. Slors ◽  
Marije Deutekom ◽  
Michael F. Gerhards ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 646-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniëlla M. J. Oom ◽  
Rachel L. West ◽  
W. Rudolph Schouten ◽  
Anneke B. Steensma

2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. S-306-S-307
Author(s):  
Ali Rezaie ◽  
Sentia Iriana ◽  
Mark Pimentel ◽  
Christopher Chang ◽  
Zuri Murrell ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 240-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo de Melo Andrade COURA ◽  
Silvana Marques SILVA ◽  
Romulo Medeiros de ALMEIDA ◽  
Miles Castedo FORREST ◽  
João Batista SOUSA

ABSTRACT Background Anal sphincter tone is routinely assessed by digital rectal examination in patients with fecal incontinence, although its accuracy in detecting sphincter defects or separating competent from incompetent muscles has not been established. Objective In this setting, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of digital rectal examination in grading anal defects in order to separate small from extensive cases as depicted on 3D endoanal ultrasound, using a scoring sphincter defect and correlate anal tone to anal pressures. Methods Women with fecal incontinence were divided into two groups: small or extensive defects according to the ultrasound scoring system. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of digital rectal examination in grading global and external sphincter defects were calculated. Anal tone at digital rectal examination was compared to resting and incremental pressures. Results A cohort of 76 consecutive incontinent women were enrolled. The median Wexner score was 9. Sixty-eight showed sphincter defects on 3D endoanal ultrasound. Anal tone at digital rectal examination was considered abnormal in 62 cases. Abnormal digital rectal examination showed a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 27.78% in distinguishing small from extensive defects of both sphincters. Five out of eight women with no sphincter defects had only abnormal squeeze tone at digital rectal examination. Abnormal squeeze tone at digital rectal examination had a sensitivity of 65.31% in distinguishing small from extensive external anal sphincter defects. Digital rectal examination sensitivity increased linearly from small to extensive external anal sphincter defects (P=0.001). Women with abnormal resting tone had lower resting pressures than women with normal tone at digital rectal examination (P=0.0001). Women with abnormal squeeze tone had lower incremental pressures than women with normal tone at digital rectal examination (P=0.017). Conclusion Digital rectal examination had good sensitivity and poor specificity in discerning small from severe global anal sphincter defects. Moreover, digital rectal examination had fair sensitivity and poor specificity in grading external anal sphincter defects, and its best accuracy was on complete external anal sphincter lesions. Anal resting and squeeze tone were correlated to anal pressures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document