Vedolizumab Induces Significantly Higher Endoscopic Remission Rates at Week 16 in Ulcerative Colitis as Compared to Crohn's Disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S754
Author(s):  
Renske Pauwels ◽  
Annemarie C. de Vries ◽  
Christien Janneke Van Der Woude
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S304-S304
Author(s):  
A HOLMER ◽  
B Boland ◽  
S Singh ◽  
H Le ◽  
J Neill ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The endoscopic healing index (EHI, Monitr, Prometheus Biosciences, San Diego, CA) is a serum-based biomarker panel available for identifying mucosal inflammation in Crohn’s disease.[1] We aimed to study its performance for identifying mucosal inflammation in ulcerative colitis. Methods EHI was analysed on serum samples paired with endoscopies from adult patients (≥18 years) participating in a prospective biobank (June 2014 to December 2017). Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) were used to assess the accuracy of EHI for endoscopic improvement (EI; Mayo endoscopic sub-score [MES] 0–1) and endoscopic remission (ER; MES 0). Sensitivity for EHI was calculated using a cut-off previously identified for Crohn’s disease which optimised performance for ruling out endoscopic activity (20 points). Alternative cut-offs were explored. Results A total of 114 patients were included, with an overall prevalence of 56% and 44% for EI and ER. The AUROC was 0.79 (95% CI 0.70–0.87) for EI and 0.70 (95% CI 0.61–0.80) for ER. A cut-off of 20 points had a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI 83–99%) for ruling out moderate to severe (MES 2–3) endoscopic activity, and a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI 72–92%) for ruling out mild to severe (MES 1–3) endoscopic activity. A cut off of 40 points or higher had > 90% specificity for ruling in moderate to severe (MES 2–3) or mild to severe (MES 1–3) endoscopic activity. (Table 1) Conclusion EHI has favourable accuracy in identifying the presence of mucosal inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis. Although it was not developed and validated for ulcerative colitis, further validation is warranted. Reference


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 1693-1701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Sugimoto ◽  
Kentaro Ikeya ◽  
Shigeki Bamba ◽  
Akira Andoh ◽  
Hiroshi Yamasaki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background & Aims The new curcumin derivative Theracurmin® has a 27–fold higher absorption rate than natural curcumin powder. Theracurmin® is an inhibitor of nuclear factor-κB, which mediates the expression of inflammatory cytokines. The effect of Theracurmin® on inflammatory bowel disease in humans has not been explored; therefore, we investigated the efficacy and safety of Theracurmin® in patients with Crohn’s disease. Methods In this randomized, double-blinded study performed at 5 independent medical centers in Japan, Theracurmin® (360 mg/day, n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) was administered to patients with active mild-to-moderate Crohn’s disease for 12 weeks. The agent’s efficacy was assessed by evaluating clinical and endoscopic remission, healing of anal lesions, and blood levels of inflammatory markers. Results In the Theracurmin® group, a significant reduction in clinical disease activity was observed in week 12 relative to that in week 0 (p = 0.005). On intention-to-treat analysis, clinical remission rates were 35%, 40%, and 40% at weeks 4, 8, and 12, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the placebo group (all 0%; p = 0.033, p = 0.020, and p = 0.020, respectively). Furthermore, reduction in endoscopic Crohn’s disease severity (p = 0.032) was observed at week 12 in the Theracurmin® group. The endoscopic remission rates were 15% and 0% in the Theracurmin® and placebo groups, respectively. Significant healing of anal lesions (p = 0.017) was observed at week 8 in the Theracurmin® group. No serious adverse events were observed in either group throughout the study. Conclusions Theracurmin® shows significant clinical and endoscopic efficacy together with a favorable safety profile in patients with active mild-to-moderate Crohn’s disease. Clinical trial UMIN registration ID UMIN000015770.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S531-S531
Author(s):  
H K Hyun ◽  
J Yu ◽  
E A Kang ◽  
J Park ◽  
S J Park ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Therapeutic options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have increased since the introduction of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors a few decades ago. However, direct comparisons of the effectiveness of second-line biological agents in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) are lacking. Methods Patients with UC or CD who experienced anti-TNF treatment failure and subsequently used vedolizumab, ustekinumab, or tofacitinib as a second-line drug were retrospectively recruited. The primary outcomes were the clinical remission rate at week 16 and the cumulative relapse rate 48 weeks after receiving induction therapy. Results A total of 94 patients with UC or CD experienced anti-TNF treatment failure and received vedolizumab (UC : 37; CD : 28), ustekinumab (CD : 16), or tofacitinib (UC : 13). The clinical remission rates were not significantly different between the vedolizumab and tofacitinib groups in UC patients (56.8% vs. 46.2%, p = 0.509). In CD patients, the clinical remission rates were not significantly different between the vedolizumab and ustekinumab groups (53.6% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.820). Moreover, the cumulative rates of clinical relapse were not significantly different between the vedolizumab and tofacitinib groups in UC patients and between the vedolizumab and ustekinumab groups in CD patients (p = 0.396 and p = 0.692, respectively). Safety profiles were also similar among the treatment groups in both UC and CD patients. Conclusion After prior anti-TNF therapy failure, vedolizumab and tofacitinib in UC patients and vedolizumab and ustekinumab in CD patients showed similarities in terms of the efficacy in inducing and maintaining a clinical response.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 864-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bram Verstockt ◽  
Erwin Dreesen ◽  
Maja Noman ◽  
An Outtier ◽  
Nathalie Van den Berghe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Ustekinumab, an anti-IL12/23p40 monoclonal antibody, has been approved for Crohn’s disease [CD]. Real-life data in CD patients receiving ustekinumab intravenously [IV] during induction, followed by subcutaneous [SC] maintenance, are lacking. We assessed efficacy of ustekinumab and studied exposure-response correlations. Methods We performed a prospective study in 86 CD patients predominantly refractory or intolerant to anti-tumour necrosis factor agents and/or vedolizumab. All received ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV induction, with 90 mg SC every 8 weeks thereafter. Endoscopic response (50% decrease in Simple Endoscopic Score for CD [SES-CD] at Week 24), endoscopic remission [SES-CD ≤2], and clinical remission [daily stool frequency ≤2.8 and abdominal pain score ≤1] were assessed at weeks 4,8,16, and 24. Further serial analyses included patient-reported outcomes [PRO2], faecal calprotectin [fCal], and ustekinumab serum levels. Results SES-CD decreased from 11.5 [8.0–18.0] at baseline to 9.0 [6.0–16.0] at week [w]24 [p = 0.0009], but proportions of patients achieving endoscopic response [20.5%] or endoscopic remission [7.1%] were low. Clinical remission rates were 39.5% at w24. After IV induction, fCal dropped from baseline [1242.9 μg/g] to w4 [529.0 μg/g] and w8 [372.2 μg/g], but increased again by w16 [537.4 μg/g] and w24 [749.0 μg/g]. A clear exposure-response relationship was observed, both during induction and during maintenance therapy, with different thresholds depending on the targeted outcome. Conclusions In this cohort of refractory CD patients, ustekinumab showed good clinical remission rates but limited endoscopic remission after 24 weeks. Our data suggest that higher doses may be required to achieve better endoscopic outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Rivière ◽  
Geert D'Haens ◽  
Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet ◽  
Filip Baert ◽  
Guy Lambrecht ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianyu Zhang ◽  
Zhengting Wang ◽  
Rong Fan ◽  
Maochen Zhang ◽  
Yun Lin ◽  
...  

Objective.To evaluate the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) monotherapy versus infliximab-azathioprine sequential treatment in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients.Methods.Patients newly diagnosed with CD using IFX as induction therapy were enrolled. After 6 times of IFX infusions, they were divided into IFX monotherapy group and IFX-AZA sequential therapy group. Clinical remission rates were assessed at weeks 57, 84, 111, and 138 while endoscopic remission rates were assessed at weeks 84 and 138 to evaluate the efficacy of these two groups.Results.A total of seventy-nine patients had accomplished 138-week follow-up. At weeks 84 and 138, the deep remission rate (18/22 and 17/22) of IFX monotherapy group was significantly higher compared to IFX-AZA sequential therapy group (26/57 and 21/57) (P=0.004and 0.001, resp.). Similar findings were found in complete endoscopic remission rate. The clinical remission rates of IFX monotherapy group were similar to that of IFX-AZA sequential therapy group (P>0.05). At weeks 84 and 138, the endoscopic remission rate and the endoscopic improvement rate between these two groups displayed no significant difference (P>0.05).Conclusion.IFX monotherapy provides higher deep remission rate compared with IFX-AZA sequential therapy in two-year maintenance therapy. For patients who could not receive prolonged IFX therapy, IFX-AZA sequential therapy is acceptable, though long-term efficacy remains to be seen.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 766-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Boland ◽  
Tomer Greener ◽  
Boyko Kabakchiev ◽  
Joanne Stempak ◽  
Jenna Tessolini ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Golimumab is approved as a therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. Recent data also demonstrate efficacy in Crohn’s disease (CD); however, little is known about target drug levels to achieve endoscopic remission. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of IBD patients on maintenance golimumab. Median trough levels were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test, and logistic regression was used to construct a probabilistic model to determine sensitivity and specificity of levels predicting mucosal healing. Results Fifty-eight patients on maintenance golimumab were included (n = 39 CD, n = 19 UC/IBD-unclassified [IBDU]). Forty percent (n = 23) were cotreated with an immunomodulator, 95% (n = 55) of patients were anti-TNF experienced, and 15.5% (n = 9) had 3 or more prior biologic therapies. Forty-four percent of patients achieved mucosal healing with endoscopic response in a further 26% of patients. Clinical remission was recorded in 41% of patients, and 82% had clinical response. Patients were treated with doses generally higher than the approved maintenance dose. In CD patients, median golimumab trough levels were higher in patients with mucosal healing (8.8 μg/mL vs 5.08 μg/mL, P = 0.03). After calculation of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for mucosal healing vs nonresponse, a trough level >8 μg/mL was associated with mucosal healing, with 67% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and a likelihood ratio of 3:4. Conclusion Treatment with golimumab was associated with mucosal healing in 44% of all IBD patients. Higher golimumab levels were associated with mucosal healing in CD. These findings support the need for prospective studies to determine target golimumab levels in IBD, which may impact current clinical practices in relation to selection of maintenance dosing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document