Gastric Ulcer with True Anacidity and Pain Relief with Alkali

1951 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 420-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Greenspan ◽  
R. Levy ◽  
H. Necheles
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1203
Author(s):  
Deepak Ekka ◽  
Swati Dubey ◽  
S. D. Khichariya ◽  
D. S. Dhruw

Anndrvashoola and Parinamshoola briefly described by aacharya Vijayrakshitand Kanthdatta on Madhukosh in shoola Nidanam 26th chapter, mainly vata dosha is responsible for that disease. In Anndrvashoola continuous pain in abdomen, pain present before meal and relif in pain after vomiting in Parinamshoola, aadhman, aatop, arti, kamp and pain relief by consuming greaspy and worm food. In modern science, according to sign symptoms we correlated with peptic ulcer. Main cause is H. Pylori, NSAID, stress, smoking, steroid either duodenum or stomach ulcer in ratio of 4:1. The peak incidence of duodenal ulcer is 5th decade while for Gastric ulcer is 6th decade and “O” blood group persons are more prone to develop duodenal ulcer.  To treat this disease Vranropan and Shothhara chikitsa is very important for that this drug should have properties like Dahaprashmana, Amashayakshata sandhan, Pittashamak, Amlatanashak, shothhara due to those action Saptamrit Louha play effective role in Shoola. Considering above factor SAPTAMRIT LOUHA is chosen in management of shoola. Later on, I will have explained how Sapamrit louha works on Anndrvashoola and Parinamshoola at the time of presentation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Minghui Xiao ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Jianping Hui

Objective: To analyze the effect of pantoprazole and omeprazole in the treatment of patients with gastric ulcer. Methods: The treatment effect, recurrence rate, helicobacter pylori negative conversion rate, adverse reaction status and pain relief time of the two groups were compared. Results: The total effective rate of the experimental group (97.78%, 44 / 45) was higher than that of the control group (84.44%, 38 / 45), P < 0.05;The recurrence rate (4.44%, 2 / 45) and Helicobacter pylori negative conversion rate (95.56%, 43 / 45) of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05); The incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group (11.11%, 5 / 45) was lower than that in the control group (15.56%, 7 / 45) (P > 0.05);The pain relief time of the experimental group was (2.24 ± 1.16) d, which was shorter than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In the process of clinical treatment of gastric ulcer, pantoprazole has significant curative effect and low recurrence rate, which can eradicate Helicobacter pylori as soon as possible, shorten the pain time and make the treatment safer.


1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (11-s4) ◽  
pp. S178-S184 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER KONTUREK ◽  
TOMASZ BRZOZOWSKI ◽  
STANISLAW KONTUREK ◽  
ELZBIETA KARCZEWSKA ◽  
ROBERT PAJDO ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A251-A251
Author(s):  
P MALFERTHEINER ◽  
M KIST ◽  
T KIRCHNER ◽  
U PEITZ ◽  
M BOHUSCHKE ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A143-A143
Author(s):  
L MA ◽  
S ELLIOTT ◽  
G CIRINO ◽  
A BURET ◽  
J WALLACE

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A153-A153
Author(s):  
S MIYAMOTO ◽  
K KATO ◽  
Y ISHII ◽  
S ASAI ◽  
T NAGAISHI ◽  
...  

1955 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 609-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Hayes
Keyword(s):  

1957 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 703-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Ε. Dagradi ◽  
Delobes E. Johnson

1959 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 779-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard G. Devereaux ◽  
J. Alfred Rider

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document