scholarly journals PHO5-LACZ hybrid proteins block translocation of native acid phosphatase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1988 ◽  
Vol 263 (14) ◽  
pp. 6908-6915
Author(s):  
P B Wolfe
1975 ◽  
Vol 141 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akio Toh-e ◽  
Sei-ichiro Kakimoto ◽  
Yasuji Oshima

1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 723-729
Author(s):  
R Haguenauer-Tsapis ◽  
M Nagy ◽  
A Ryter

We studied ultrastructural localization of acid phosphatase in derepressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells transformed with a multicopy plasmid carrying either the wild-type PHO5 gene or a PHO5 gene deleted in the region overlapping the signal peptidase cleavage site. Wild-type enzyme was located in the cell wall, as was 50% of the modified protein, which carried high-mannose-sugar chains. The remaining 50% of the protein was active and core glycosylated, and it accumulated in the endoplasmic reticulum cisternae. The signal peptide remained uncleaved in both forms. Cells expressing the modified protein exhibited an exaggerated endoplasmic reticulum with dilated lumen.


1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
J H Cramer ◽  
K Lea ◽  
M D Schaber ◽  
R A Kramer

We linked the cDNA coding region for the bean storage protein phaseolin to the promoter and regulatory region of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae repressible acid phosphatase gene (PHO5) in multicopy expression plasmids. Yeast transformants containing these plasmids expressed phaseolin at levels up to 3% of the total soluble cellular protein. Phaseolin polypeptides in S. cerevisiae were glycosylated, and their molecular weights suggested that the signal peptide had been processed. We also constructed a series of plasmids in which the phaseolin signal-peptide-coding region was either removed or replaced with increasing amounts of the amino-terminal coding region for acid phosphatase. Phaseolin polypeptides with no signal peptide were not posttranslationally modified in S. cerevisiae. Partial or complete substitution of the phaseolin signal peptide with that from acid phosphatase dramatically inhibited both signal peptide processing and glycosylation, suggesting that some specific feature of the phaseolin signal amino acid sequence was required for these modifications to occur. Larger hybrid proteins that included approximately one-half of the acid phosphatase sequence linked to the amino terminus of the mature phaseolin polypeptide did undergo proteolytic processing and glycosylation. However, these polypeptides were cleaved at several sites that are not normally used in the unaltered acid phosphatase protein.


1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 6410-6418 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Pi ◽  
C T Chien ◽  
S Fields

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ste12p induces transcription of pheromone-responsive genes by binding to a DNA sequence designated the pheromone response element. We generated a series of hybrid proteins of Ste12p with the DNA-binding and activation domains of the transcriptional activator Gal4p to define a pheromone induction domain of Ste12p sufficient to mediate pheromone-induced transcription by these hybrid proteins. A minimal pheromone induction domain, delineated as residues 301 to 335 of Ste12p, is dependent on the pheromone mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway for induction activity. Mutation of the three serine and threonine residues within the minimal pheromone induction domain did not affect transcriptional induction, indicating that the activity of this domain is not directly regulated by MAP kinase phosphorylation. By contrast, mutation of the two tyrosines or their preceding acidic residues led to a high level of transcriptional activity in the absence of pheromone and consequently to the loss of pheromone induction. This constitutively high activity was not affected by mutations in the MAP kinase cascade, suggesting that the function of the pheromone induction domain is normally repressed in the absence of pheromone. By two-hybrid analysis, this minimal domain interacts with two negative regulators, Dig1p and Dig2p (also designated Rst1p and Rst2p), and the interaction is abolished by mutation of the tyrosines. The pheromone induction domain itself has weak and inducible transcriptional activity, and its ability to potentiate transcription depends on the activity of an adjacent activation domain. These results suggest that the pheromone induction domain of Ste12p mediates transcriptional induction via a two-step process: the relief of repression and synergistic transcriptional activation with another activation domain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document