Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice

2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 191
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Fatma Al Saleh ◽  
Moosa AbuZayeda ◽  
Sudarat Kiat-amnuay ◽  
Alexander Milosevic

Background. With various surgical and prosthetic component designs being introduced in dental implants, decisions have to be made when choosing a system and a certain prosthodontic protocol. A survey of implant prosthodontic specialists has not been previously performed in the Middle East. Aim. This study aimed to determine selection criteria and choice of dental implants and restorations by prosthodontic specialists in the Emirate of Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Materials and Methods. A validated 16-item questionnaire was used in the survey which included demographic information, implant training and experience, implant treatment planning, implant restoration, and implant system preference. The research protocol was approved by the Research and Ethics Committees of Hamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine and Dubai Health Authority. Prosthodontists were identified from regulatory authority websites and contacted by e-mail with the questionnaire attached. Results. A total of 84.6% (77) of the registered prosthodontists in Dubai completed the questionnaire with 66.2% reported practicing implant dentistry. Out of which, 54.9% reported surgically placing dental implants and 45.1% restore them only prosthetically. Prefabricated metal abutments were the most commonly selected abutments for single crowns (76.0%) and for fixed dental prostheses (66.7%). Screw retention is preferred mostly for single crowns (68.0%) and fixed dental prostheses (74.0%). Locators were the most commonly selected type of attachment for implant-retained/supported overdentures (49.0%). Conventional loading was the most selected type of loading in all oral conditions. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that most prosthodontists in Dubai practice implant dentistry and more than half surgically place dental implants. Prefabricated metal abutments are the most selected type of abutments. Most prosthodontists use screw-retained implant restorations and prefer locator attachments for implant-retained/supported overdentures. Conventional loading is the most preferred implant loading method in all oral conditions. Implant company/system selections are various and there is no major preference for a certain system. The majority of prosthodontists select implant systems based on implant features, literature review, and simplicity of restorative kit.


2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Reitemeier ◽  
Kristina Hänsel ◽  
Christian Kastner ◽  
Anke Weber ◽  
Michael H. Walter

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (S16) ◽  
pp. 199-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjarni E Pjetursson ◽  
Nicola A Valente ◽  
Malin Strasding ◽  
Marcel Zwahlen ◽  
Shiming Liu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-96
Author(s):  
Cibele Oliveira de Melo Rocha ◽  
Diogo Longhini ◽  
Rodrigo de Paula Pereira ◽  
João Neudenir Arioli Filho

Abstract There are few informations about the influence of cusp inclination on the fracture strength of implant-supported crowns. The study aimed to evaluate the influence of cusp inclination and retention type on fracture load in implant-supported metal-ceramic single crowns. Sixty crowns were made, classified as cemented and screw-retained with screw access hole (SAH) sealed or not. Standard (33°) and reduced (20°) cusp inclinations were tested for each group (n=10). To support crowns of a mandibular second molar, analogs of external hexagon implants 5.0 were used. The fracture load was measured in a universal testing machine EMIC DL2000 (10 kN load cell; 0.5 mm/min). Two-way ANOVA (retention and cusp inclination) followed by post hoc Tukey’s honest significant difference test was used for the statistical analyses (a=0.05). Crowns with reduced cusp inclination exhibited significantly higher fracture load (p<0.01) than crowns with standard cusp inclination. Cemented crowns showed significantly higher fracture load (p<0.01) than screw-retained crowns. The interaction among these factors was not significant (p>0.05) for the fracture load. The sealing of SAH did not influence the fracture load of screw-retained crowns (p>0.05). In conclusion, fracture load of implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns was influenced by retention and cusp inclination, and there was no influence of the sealing of SAH.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-233
Author(s):  
Bishal Babu Basnet

 Immediate placement of implants into the freshly extracted tooth sockets is viable and preferable option in many cases who have to wait for healing phase in traditional implant therapy. This has been a great boon for the implant dentistry. In this case a young lady who had unusual trauma to her upper front tooth had immediate implant placed on the same day of extraction and metal-ceramic crown restored her esthetics after about 4 months. With extensive treatment planning and execution of surgical and prosthetic phases of implant therapy, immediate placement of dental implant gives wonderful results. Birat Journal of Health Sciences Vol.2/No.1/Issue 2/ Jan - April 2017, page: 230-233


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document