Silent lacunar infarction on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Risk factors

1998 ◽  
Vol 160 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuzo Shintani ◽  
Tatsuo Shiigai ◽  
Tadao Arinami
2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 124-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celine Guidoux ◽  
Jean-Jacques Hauw ◽  
Isabelle F. Klein ◽  
Julien Labreuche ◽  
Claudine Berr ◽  
...  

Background: Risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) include hypertension and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). The objective of this study was to determine the autopsy prevalence of CAA and the potential overlap with other risk factors among patients who died from ICH and also the correlation of CAA with cerebral microbleeds. Methods: We analyzed 81 consecutive autopsy brains from patients with ICH. Staining for CAA detection was performed. We used an age- and sex-matched control group of routine brain autopsies of nonneurological patients to determine the frequencies of CAA and hypertension. Postmortem 3D T2-weighted gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a 1.5-T magnet was performed in 11 brains with ICH (5 with CAA and 6 without) and histological correlation was performed when microbleeds were detected. Results: Hypertension and CAA were found in 69.1 and 24.7% of cases respectively. Among patients with CAA, 65.0% also had hypertension. The prevalence of CAA was similar among non-hypertensive cases and controls (33.3 and 23.1%; p = 0.54), whereas a significant difference was found between hypertensive cases vs. controls (28.9% vs. 0; p = 0.01). MRI documented 48 microbleeds and all 5 brains with CAA had ≥1 microbleed, compared to 3/6 brains without CAA. Among 48 microbleeds on MRI, 45 corresponded histologically to microbleeds surrounding microvessels (23 <200 µm in diameter, 19 between 200 µm and 2 mm, 3 were hemosiderin granules). Conclusions: Both hypertension and CAA frequently coexist in patients with ICH. MRI-detected microbleeds, proven by histological analysis, were twice as common in patients with CAA as in those with hypertensive ICH.


Author(s):  
Joseph L. Yellin ◽  
Peter D. Fabricant ◽  
Jason B. Anari ◽  
Alexander L. Neuwirth ◽  
Theodore J. Ganley ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changming An ◽  
Ying Sun ◽  
Susheng Miao ◽  
Xiaoduo Yu ◽  
Ye Zhang ◽  
...  

BackgroundTo assess the prevalence, risk factors and prognostic significance of retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) metastasis diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC).Methods259 patients from three cancer institutions in China from Jan 2010 to Dec 2018 were analyzed, retrospectively. All the patients had been given pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of head and neck and were then treated with definitive radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Pretreatment diagnostic MRIs were reviewed by a dedicated head and neck radiologist, for the presence or absence of radiographically positive RPLN, cervical LN and tumor invasion.Demographic variables were analysed by descriptive statistics using SPSS 20.0. Predictors of the presence of RPLN and its prognostic significance were examined.ResultsRPLN metastasis was discovered in 44 patients (17%). Logistic analysis showed that posterior pharyngeal wall (PPW) primary tumor; PPW invasion; N2-3; multiple cervical lymph node (LN) involvement (&gt;2 LNs) were associated with RPLN metastasis, with metastasis rates 37%, 30%, 31% and 33% respectively. Patients with RPLN metastasis had a significantly reduced 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared to the non-RPLN metastasis group (OS 28% vs. 48%, p=0.001; DFS 25% vs. 41%, p=0.040).ConclusionsRPLN metastasis was not uncommon in HPSCC patients. Risk factors were: PPW primary tumor, PPW invasion and cervical LN status. RPLN metastasis is a poor prognosticator for survival.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 405-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Griffith ◽  
Radhesh Krishna Lalam

AbstractWhen it comes to examining the brachial plexus, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are complementary investigations. US is well placed for screening most extraforaminal pathologies, whereas MRI is more sensitive and accurate for specific clinical indications. For example, MRI is probably the preferred technique for assessment of trauma because it enables a thorough evaluation of both the intraspinal and extraspinal elements, although US can depict extraforaminal neural injury with a high level of accuracy. Conversely, US is probably the preferred technique for examination of neurologic amyotrophy because a more extensive involvement beyond the brachial plexus is the norm, although MRI is more sensitive than US for evaluating muscle denervation associated with this entity. With this synergy in mind, this review highlights the tips for examining the brachial plexus with US and MRI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document