1559: Alfuzosin 10MG Once Daily is Well Tolerated in Elderly and Antihypertensive Patients in the Long-Term

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 515-515
Author(s):  
Claus G. Roehrborn ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Désirée M F M van der Heijde ◽  
Cynthia E Kartman ◽  
Li Xie ◽  
Scott Beattie ◽  
Douglas E Schlichting ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Aims  Baricitinib (BARI) is an oral, reversible, selective JAK1/2 inhibitor. Treatment with once-daily oral BARI resulted in low rates of radiographic progression for up to 2 years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here, we evaluate the radiographic progression of structural joint damage in patients with RA over 5 years of treatment with BARI. Methods  This included patients who completed three Phase 3 trials, RA-BEGIN (DMARD-naive), RA-BUILD (csDMARD-IR), or RA-BEAM (MTX-IR), and enrolled in long-term extension study, RA-BEYOND. Patients receiving blinded BARI at the conclusion of Phase 3 trials remained on that dose (2mg/4mg, once daily) in RA-BEYOND. At 52 weeks, DMARD-naive patients receiving methotrexate(MTX) or combination therapy(BARI 4mg+MTX) were switched to BARI 4mg monotherapy; MTX-IR patients receiving adalimumab(ADA) were switched to BARI 4mg on background MTX. At 24 weeks, csDMARD-IR patients receiving placebo(PBO) were switched to BARI 4mg on background csDMARD. Analysis population included patients who had baseline and at least one radiograph collected after 2 years. Radiographic progression of structural joint damage (Years 3-5) was determined by changes from baseline in van der Heijdemodified Total Sharp Score(ΔmTSS), erosion score, and joint space narrowing. Proportion of patients showing no progression was assessed based on change from baseline mTSS(ΔmTSS) from originating study, using thresholds of 0.5 or smallest detectable change(SDC). Mixedmodel repeatedmeasures and logistic regression models were used to analyze continuous variables and categorical variables, respectively; linear extrapolation was used for imputation of missing data(maximum of 1 year). Results  82.6% (2125/2573) of patients entered long-term extension study. Among DMARD-naive patients, those on initial BARI monotherapy or in combination with MTX had significantly slower radiographic progression(ΔmTSS) versus those on initial MTX at Years 3, 4, 5 (p ≤ 0.05). They had significantly fewer erosions at these time points (p ≤ 0.05). A greater proportion of patients who received initial BARI therapy and BARI+MTX had no radiographic progression versus initial MTX monotherapy using thresholds of 0.5 (p ≤ 0.05). Among MTX-IR patients, those on initial BARI treatment had slower radiographic progression compared to PBO and results were comparable to those on initial ADA treatment at Years 3, 4, 5. A greater proportion of patients who received initial BARI therapy had no radiographic progression versus initial PBO using thresholds of SDC (p ≤ 0.05). Among csDMARD-IR patients, although differences between groups were small, patients on initial BARI 4mg had slowest radiographic progression compared to initial PBO and initial BARI 2mg. At least 74% of the structure data used in the analyses are based on observed data. Conclusion  Treatment with once-daily oral BARI maintained low rates of radiographic progression for up to 5 years in different patient populations with RA. Disclosure  D.M.F.M. van der Heijde: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and UCB Pharma. C.E. Kartman: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. L. Xie: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. S. Beattie: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. D.E. Schlichting: Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. P. Durez: Member of speakers’ bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, and Sanofi. Y. Tanaka: Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Asahi-kasei, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, and YL Biologics. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, MSD, Ono, and Taisho-Toyama and Takeda. R. Fleischmann: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and UCB.


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (S15) ◽  
pp. 22-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy E. Wilens ◽  
Thomas J. Spencer ◽  
Joseph Biederman

AbstractObjectiveAssess cardiovascular effects of once-daily mixed amphetamine salts extended release (MAS XR) in adolescents (13–17 years of age) with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).MethodsBlood pressure (BP), pulse, and electrocardiograms were assessed in 327 healthy subjects during a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, forced dose-titration study. Placebo (n=69) or once-daily MAS XR(10, 20, 30, or 40 mg) was administered to subjects ≤75 kg (n=233); 50- and 60-mg MAS XR was administered to subjects >75 kg (n=25). One hundred thirty-eight subjects participated in a 6-month, open-label extension study.FindingsChanges in BP and QTcB (Bazett's formula) intervals at 4 weeks with MAS XR were not significantly different from the placebo group. Pulse increased by 5.0 and 8.5 bpm after 3 weeks with MAS XR 20 and 50 mg/day, respectively (P≤.002). After 6 months of open-label MAS XR treatment, mean increases in systolic BP (1.7 mm Hg; P=.0252) and pulse (4.4 bpm; P<.0001) were statistically, but not clinically, significant diastolic BP was not significantly changed (0.6 mm Hg) A decrease in QTcB interval (-4.6±19.9 msec) was statistically (P=.009), but not clinically, significant. There were no serious cardiovascular adverse events.ConclusionCardiovascular effects of short- and long-term MAS XR treatment (≤60 mg/day) were minimal in otherwise healthy adolescents with ADHD.


2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 543-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Amerena ◽  
S Pappas ◽  
J-P Ouellet ◽  
L Williams ◽  
D O'Shaughnessy

In this multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) study, the efficacy of 12 weeks' treatment with once-daily telmisartan 40–80 mg and enalapril 10–20 mg was evaluated using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in 522 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Patients were titrated to the higher dose of study drug at week 6 if mean seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was ≥ 90 mmHg. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in ambulatory DBP in the last 6 h of the 24-h dosing interval after 12 weeks' treatment. Telmisartan and enalapril produced similar reductions from baseline in DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) over all ABPM periods evaluated (last 6 h, 24-h, daytime and night-time). Telmisartan produced a significantly greater reduction in mean seated trough DBP, measured unblinded with an automated ABPM device in the clinic, amounting to a difference of −2.02 mmHg ( P < 0.01). A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved a seated diastolic response with telmisartan than enalapril (59% versus 50%; P < 0.05), also measured with the same ABPM device. Both treatments were well tolerated. Compared with telmisartan, enalapril was associated with a higher incidence of cough (8.9% versus 0.8%) and hypotension (3.9% versus 1.1%). Therefore, telmisartan may provide better long-term compliance and, consequently, better blood pressure control than enalapril.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document