145: Urinary Function Quality of Life After Laparoscopic or Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 38-38
Author(s):  
Laura E. Crocitto ◽  
Timothy Wilson ◽  
Jeffrey S. Yoshida ◽  
Soroush A. Ramin ◽  
Mark H. Kawachi
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eoin Dinneen ◽  
Jack Grierson ◽  
Ricardo Almeida Magana ◽  
Rosie Clow ◽  
Aiman Haider ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundRobotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a first-line curative treatment option for localized prostate cancer. Postoperative erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence are common associated adverse side effects that can negatively impact patients’ quality of life. Preserving the lateral neurovascular bundles (NS) during RARP improves functional outcomes. However, selecting men for NS may be difficult when there is concern about incurring in positive surgical margin (PSM) which in turn risks adverse oncological outcomes. The NeuroSAFE technique (intra-operative frozen section examination of the neurovascular structure adjacent prostate margin) can provide real-time pathological consult to promote optimal NS while avoiding PSM.MethodsNeuroSAFE PROOF is a single-blinded, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which men are randomly allocated 1:1 to either NeuroSAFE RARP or standard RARP. Men electing for RARP as primary treatment, who are continent and have good baseline erectile function (EF), defined by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score>21, are eligible. NS in the intervention arm is guided by the NeuroSAFE technique. NS in the standard arm is based on standard of care, i.e., a pre-operative image-based planning meeting, patient-specific clinical information, and digital rectal examination. The primary outcome is assessment of EF at 12-months. The primary endpoint is the proportion of men who achieve IIEF-5 score ≥ 21. A sample size of 404 was calculated to give a power of 90% to detect a difference of 14% between groups based on a feasibility study. Oncological outcomes are continuously monitored by an independent Data Monitoring Committee. Key secondary outcomes include urinary continence at 3 months assessed by the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire, rate of biochemical recurrence, EF recovery at 24-months, and difference in quality of life.DiscussionThe NeuroSAFE PROOF is the first RCT of intra-operative frozen section in radical prostatectomy in the world. It is properly powered to evaluate a difference in the recovery of EF for men undergoing RARP assessed by patient reported outcome measures. It will provide evidence to guide the use of the NeuroSAFE technique around the world.Trial registration: NCT03317990 (23 October 2017). Regional Ethics Committee; reference 17/LO/1978.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 107-107
Author(s):  
Stacy Loeb ◽  
Meike Adam ◽  
Pierre Tennstedt ◽  
Wolfgang Huber ◽  
Juergen Bernard ◽  
...  

107 Background: While the optimal use and timing of secondary therapy after radical prostatectomy remain controversial, there are limited data on the patient-reported outcomes following multimodality therapy. Our objective was to assess the impact of additional radiation and/or hormonal therapy on long-term urinary continence, quality of life and potency after radical prostatectomy. Methods: Among 13150 men treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) from 1992-2013, 905 underwent secondary radiation therapy (RP+RT), 407 received androgen deprivation therapy (RP+ADT) and 688 a combination of RT and ADT (RP+RT+ADT). Urinary function, sexual function and quality of life were evaluated annually using self-administrated validated questionnaires. Urinary function was assessed by the use of the number of pads in 24h (analyzed as 0 pads, safety only, 1-2, or ≥ 3 pads). Potency was defined as ≥ 3 points out of 5 on the question whether erections were hard enough for penetration. Quality of life was assessed using a score from 0-100%.The distribution of urinary function, sexual function and quality of life were plotted as a function of time after bootstrap analysis (n = 1000) of a propensity score matched cohort. Results: Urinary function. The distribution of 0 pads and 1 safety pad between patients with a) RP and RP+RT was 72.3% vs. 67.9% and 16.7% vs. 18.6%; b) between RP and RP+HT was 64.5% vs. 55.5% and 16.1% vs. 21.9%; c) between RP and RP+RT+ADT was 67.4% vs. 54.8% and 17.7% vs. 21.8% and d) between RP+RT and RP+RT+ADT was 64.5% vs. 55.5% and 16.1% vs. 21.9%. Potency. The distribution of potency between patients with a) RP and RP+RT was 62.9% vs. 40.0%; b) between RP and RP+HT was 59.1% vs. 29.3%; c) between RP and RP+RT+ADT was 57.4% vs. 24.0% and d) between RP+RT and RP+RT+ADT was 44.2% vs. 32.1%. Quality of life. The distribution of a score of 83.3%-100% between patients with a) RP and RP+RT was 67.9% vs. 57.4%; b) between RP and RP+HT was 57.8% vs. 41.7%; c) between RP and RP+RT+ADT was 59.3% vs. 48.2% and d) between RP+RT and RP+RT+ADT was 60.0% vs. 41.2%. Conclusions: Secondary therapy after radical prostatectomy has a negative influence on urinary function, potency and quality of life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document