Surgical Skills Course Benefits Medical Students

Ob Gyn News ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
JEFF EVANS
2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Bauer ◽  
Niklas Rommel ◽  
Steffen Koerdt ◽  
Andreas Fichter ◽  
Klaus-Dietrich Wolff ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 100 (10) ◽  
pp. 985-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Bramson ◽  
Mark Sadoski ◽  
Charles W. Sanders ◽  
Kim van Walsum ◽  
Robert Wiprud

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 742
Author(s):  
Joana Fernandes Ribeiro ◽  
Manuel Rosete ◽  
Andreia Teixeira ◽  
Hugo Conceição ◽  
Lèlita Santos

Introduction: Technical skills training is fundamental for clinical practice although poorly emphasised in undergraduate medical curricula. In these circumstances, Peer Assisted Learning methodology has emerged as a valid alternative to overcome this insufficiency. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact on students of a Peer Assisted Learning program in basic surgical skills, regarding technical competences and knowledge improvement.Material and Methods: A total of 104 randomly selected third year medical students participated in a workshop delivered by fifth year students. From that total, 34 students were assessed before and after the workshop, using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills instrument, that consists of a global rating scale and a procedure-specific checklist. Sixth year students (control group) were also assessed in their performance without participating in the workshop. Before workshop versus after workshop Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills results were compared using Wilcoxon and McNemar tests. After workshop versus control group Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills results were compared using Mann-Whitney, qui-squared test and Fisher’s exact test.Results: For the global rating scale, students obtained an after the workshop score (29.5) that was significantly higher than the before the workshop score (15.5; p-value < 0.001), but no significant differences were found between after the workshop and control group scores (p-value = 0.167). For the procedure-specific checklist, 3rd year students had a substantial positive evolution in all parameters and obtained higher rates of correct achievements compared to the control group.Discussion: The final outcomes demonstrated a significant qualitative and quantitative improvement of knowledge and technical skills, which is in accordance with other literature.Conclusion: This Peer Assisted Learning program revealed promising results concerning improvement of surgical skills in medical students, with little staff faculty contribution and extension to a much broader number of students.


2018 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 40S
Author(s):  
Eva Welch ◽  
Sali Jordan ◽  
Francine McLeod ◽  
Emily Marko ◽  
Michael Sheridan

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (12) ◽  
pp. 575-576
Author(s):  
Luke T. Meredith ◽  
Morton L. Kasdan

2019 ◽  
Vol 405 ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
A. Vanjura dos Santos ◽  
S. Nunes ◽  
I. Bermudez Pirani ◽  
M. Coelho Dutra Silva ◽  
I. Saori Ishizu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 155335062110035
Author(s):  
Brian R Quaranto ◽  
Michael Lamb ◽  
John Traversone ◽  
Jinwei Hu ◽  
James Lukan ◽  
...  

Introduction. Teaching surgical skills has historically been a hands-on activity, with instructors and learners in close physical proximity. This paradigm was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, requiring innovative solutions to surmount the challenges of teaching surgical skills remotely. In this work, we describe our institution’s path and early results of developing an interactive remote surgical skills course for medical students in the surgical clerkship. Methods. 31 third-year medical students were distributed a set of surgical equipment and 3D printed phone dock. Each participant completed a baseline questionnaire and underwent 3 structured interactive remote sessions on surgical instruments, knot tying, and suturing techniques. Students were instructed on sharing their first-person viewpoint and received real-time feedback on their knot tying and suturing techniques from the course instructor. Pre- and post-session surveys were conducted and analyzed. Results. All students were able to complete the remote surgical skills course successfully, as defined by visually demonstrating successful two-handed knot and simple suture techniques. Students’ aggregate confidence score in their knot tying ability (pretest mean 7.9, SD 0.7 vs posttest mean 9.7, SD 0.9, t-statistic −2.3, P = .03) and suturing ability (pretest mean 8.0, SD 1.3 vs posttest mean 13.8, SD 0.9 t-statistic −5.5, P < .001) significantly improved after the intervention. Qualitative feedback from the students underscored the utility of the first-person perspective for teaching surgical technique. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that remote teaching of knot tying and simple suturing to medical students can be effectively implemented using a remote learning curriculum that was well received by the learners.


2014 ◽  
Vol 191 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishaal Gupta ◽  
Andrea Lantz ◽  
Tarek Alzharani ◽  
Kirsten Foell ◽  
Jason Y. Lee

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Guérard-Poirier ◽  
Michèle Beniey ◽  
Léamarie Meloche-Dumas ◽  
Florence Lebel-Guay ◽  
Bojana Misheva ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Traditionally, medical students have learned surgical skills by observing a resident physician or surgeon who is performing the technique. Due to inconsistent practice opportunities in the clinical setting, a disparity of skill levels among students has been observed. In addition, the poor availability of faculty professors is a limiting factor in teaching and adequately preparing medical students for their clerkship years. With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, medical students do not have access to traditional suturing learning opportunities. Didactic courses are available on videoconferencing platforms; however, these courses do not include technical training. OBJECTIVE Our overarching goal is to evaluate the efficacy and usability of web-based peer-learning for advanced suturing techniques (ie, running subcuticular sutures). We will use the Gamified Educational Network (GEN), a newly developed web-based learning tool. We will assess students’ ability to identify and perform the correct technique. We will also assess the students’ satisfaction with regard to GEN. METHODS We will conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial with blinding of expert examiners. First-year medical students in the Faculty of Medicine of Université de Montréal will be randomized into four groups: (1) control, (2) self-learning, (3) peer-learning, and (4) peer-learning with expert feedback. Each arm will have 15 participants who will learn how to perform running subcuticular sutures through videos on GEN. For our primary outcome, the students’ ability to identify the correct technique will be evaluated before and after the intervention on GEN. The students will view eight videos and rate the surgical techniques using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills Global Rating Scale and the Subcuticular Suture Checklist as evaluation criteria. For our secondary outcomes, students will anonymously record themselves performing a running subcuticular suture and will be evaluated using the same scales. Then, a survey will be sent to assess the students’ acceptance of the intervention. RESULTS The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by our institutional review board (CERSES 20-068-D). No participants have been recruited yet. CONCLUSIONS Peer learning through GEN has the potential to overcome significant limitations related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the lack of availability of faculty professors. Further, a decrease of the anxiety related to traditional suturing classes can be expected. We aim to create an innovative and sustainable method of teaching surgical skills to improve the efficiency and quality of surgical training in medical faculties. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the need for such tools is imperative. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04425499; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04425499 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT PRR1-10.2196/21273


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document