The value of endocervical curettage in satisfactory and normal colposcopic examinations performed for cervical cytology of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

1999 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. S6
Author(s):  
D WILLIAMS ◽  
C DIETRICH
2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 485-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Jakobsson ◽  
J Tarkkanen ◽  
E Auvinen ◽  
R Häkkinen ◽  
P Laurila ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to establish whether a combination of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing and cervical cytology could reduce colposcopy referral among women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology. We randomized 598 women in the Helsinki area, Finland into three study groups. Different strategies of hrHPV testing, cytology and colposcopy with biopsy were used; subsequent hrHPV test results and cytological findings were compared with histology. The rates of hrHPV positivity and CIN2+ were compared. In total, 62.5% of all samples were hrHPV-positive. Altogether 45 (12.7%) CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) lesions were found in study groups A and B. Among hrHPV-positive women the rate of CIN2+ was 19.0% ( n = 43), in contrast with 1.6% ( n = 2) among hrHPV-negative women (relative risk = 12.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6–81.1, P < 0.001). Among all hrHPV-negative women whose cytological findings were normal or ASCUS, dysplastic lesions were uncommon ( n = 4/119, 3.4%), and all were CIN1. If these women had not been referred to colposcopy, the number of colposcopies would have been reduced by 33.6%. We conclude that hrHPV testing combined with repeat cervical cytology had a high negative predictive value in patients with recurrent low-grade cervical cytology. This could reduce the referral rate to colposcopy without jeopardizing patient safety.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Katsunari Ishida ◽  
Makoto Nagasaki ◽  
Masayuki Kobayashi ◽  
Tatsushi Nakagawa ◽  
Toru Nabika ◽  
...  

To examine the diagnostic utility for squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) by cytological in situ hybridization (c-ISH) for the human papillomavirus using liquid-based cytology specimens, we investigated c-ISH signal patterns in the cases of low-grade SIL (LSIL), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), and high-grade SIL (HSIL). Episomal (E) and/or integrated (I) signals were observed. Two signal patterns (E≧I or I>E) were obtained by counting the number of E+ or I+ cells. E≧I was specific to LSIL and ASC-US (10/12); I>E, to HSIL (9/11) (P<0.01, χ2 test), suggesting significant utility of c-ISH in diagnosing SIL. In the cell fraction, E≧I in large cells was dominant in LSIL. Two cases of I>E in large cells of LSIL showed HPV persistence and/or progression during follow-up. Thus, c-ISH is useful in routine testing for diagnosing cervical dysplastic lesions, especially for detecting LSIL suspected for progression.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Rattiya Phianpiset ◽  
Irene Ruengkhachorn ◽  
Nida Jareemit ◽  
Pornprom Ittiamornlert ◽  
Pattama Chaopotong ◽  
...  

CytoJournal ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod B. Shidham ◽  
Ravi Mehrotra ◽  
George Varsegi ◽  
Krista L. D'Amore ◽  
Bryan Hunt ◽  
...  

Background: p16 INK4a (p16) is a well-recognized surrogate molecular marker for human papilloma virus (HPV) related squamous dysplasia. Our hypothesis is that the invasive interventions and related morbidities could be avoided by objective stratification of positive cytologic interpretations by p16 immunostaining of cell block sections of cytology specimens. Materials and Methods: Nuclear immunoreactivity for p16 was evaluated in cell block sections in 133 adequate cases [20 negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy, 28 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), 50 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 21 atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H), and 14 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS)] and analyzed with cervical biopsy results. Results: (a) HSIL cytology (28): 21 (75%) were p16 positive (11 biopsies available — 92% were positive for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 and above) and 7 (25%) were p16 negative (3 biopsies available — all showed only HPV with small atypical parakeratotic cells). (b) LSIL cytology (50): 13 (26%) cases were p16 positive (12 biopsies available — all were CIN1 or above) and 37 (74%) were p16 negative (12 biopsies available — all negative for dysplasia. However, 9 (75%) of these biopsies showed HPV). (c) ASC-H cytology (21): 14 (67%) were p16 positive (6 biopsies available — 5 showed CIN 3/Carcinoma in situ/Ca and 1 showed CIN 1 with possibility of under-sampling. Cytomorphologic re-review favored HSIL) and 7 (33%) were p16 negative (5 biopsies available — 3 negative for dysplasia. Remaining 2 cases — 1 positive for CIN 3 and 1 showed CIN 1 with scant ASC-H cells on cytomorphologic re-review with possibility under-sampling in cytology specimen). (d) ASCUS cytology (14): All (100%) were p16 negative on cell block sections of cervical cytology specimen. HPV testing performed in last 6 months in 7 cases was positive in 3 (43%) cases. Conclusion: p16 immunostaining on cell block sections of cervical cytology specimens showed distinct correlation patterns with biopsy results. Reflex p16 immunostaining of cell blocks based on the algorithmic approach to be evaluated by a multiinstitutional comprehensive prospective study is proposed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document