Structure-based, targeted deglycosylation of HIV-1 gp120 and effects on neutralization sensitivity and antibody recognition

ABSTRACTAntibodies (Abs) specific for the V3 loop of the HIV-1 gp120 envelope neutralize most tier 1 and many tier 2 viruses and are present in essentially all HIV-infected individuals as well as immunized humans and animals. Vaccine-induced V3 Abs are associated with reduced HIV infection rates in humans and affect the nature of transmitted viruses in infected vaccinees, despite the fact that V3 is often occluded in the envelope trimer. Here, we link structural and experimental data showing how conformational alterations of the envelope trimer render viruses exceptionally sensitive to V3 Abs. The experiments interrogated the neutralization sensitivity of pseudoviruses with single amino acid mutations in various regions of gp120 that were predicted to alter packing of the V3 loop in the Env trimer. The results indicate that the V3 loop is metastable in the envelope trimer on the virion surface, flickering between states in which V3 is either occluded or available for binding to chemokine receptors (leading to infection) and to V3 Abs (leading to virus neutralization). The spring-loaded V3 in the envelope trimer is easily released by disruption of the stability of the V3 pocket in the unliganded trimer or disruption of favorable V3/pocket interactions. Formation of the V3 pocket requires appropriate positioning of the V1V2 domain, which is, in turn, dependent on the conformation of the bridging sheet and on the stability of the V1V2 B-C strand-connecting loop.IMPORTANCEThe levels of antibodies to the third variable region (V3) of the HIV envelope protein correlate with reduced HIV infection rates. Previous studies showed that V3 is often occluded, as it sits in a pocket of the envelope trimer on the surface of virions; however, the trimer is flexible, allowing occluded portions of the envelope (like V3) to flicker into an exposed position that binds antibodies. Here we provide a systematic interrogation of mechanisms by which single amino acid changes in various regions of gp120 (i) render viruses sensitive to neutralization by V3 antibodies, (ii) result in altered packing of the V3 loop, and (iii) activate an open conformation that exposes V3 to the effects of V3 Abs. Taken together, these and previous studies explain how V3 antibodies can protect against HIV-1 infection and why they should be one of the targets of vaccine-induced antibodies.

Download Full-text

eCD4-Ig Variants That More Potently Neutralize HIV-1

Journal of Virology ◽

10.1128/jvi.02011-17 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 92 (12) ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Ina Fetzer ◽

Matthew R. Gardner ◽

Meredith E. Davis-Gardner ◽

Neha R. Prasad ◽

Barnett Alfant ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Neutralizing Antibodies ◽

Entry Inhibitor ◽

Immune Effector ◽

Effector Cells ◽

Antibody Recognition ◽

Immunodeficiency Virus ◽

Latently Infected ◽

Infected Cells ◽

Prophylaxis Therapy ◽

Hiv 1

ABSTRACTThe human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) entry inhibitor eCD4-Ig is a fusion of CD4-Ig and a coreceptor-mimetic peptide. eCD4-Ig is markedly more potent than CD4-Ig, with neutralization efficiencies approaching those of HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs). However, unlike bNAbs, eCD4-Ig neutralized all HIV-1, HIV-2, and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) isolates that it has been tested against, suggesting that it may be useful in clinical settings, where antibody escape is a concern. Here, we characterize three new eCD4-Ig variants, each with a different architecture and each utilizing D1.22, a stabilized form of CD4 domain 1. These variants were 10- to 20-fold more potent than our original eCD4-Ig variant, with a construct bearing four D1.22 domains (eD1.22-HL-Ig) exhibiting the greatest potency. However, this variant mediated less efficient antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity than eCD4-Ig itself or several other eCD4-Ig variants, including the smallest variant (eD1.22-Ig). A variant with the same architecture as the original eCD4-Ig (eD1.22-D2-Ig) showed modestly higher thermal stability and best prevented the promotion of infection of CCR5-positive, CD4-negative cells. All three variants, and eCD4-Ig itself, mediated more efficient shedding of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 than did CD4-Ig. Finally, we show that only three D1.22 mutations contributed to the potency of eD1.22-D2-Ig and that introduction of these changes into eCD4-Ig resulted in a variant 9-fold more potent than eCD4-Ig and 2-fold more potent than eD1.22-D2-Ig. These studies will assist in developing eCD4-Ig variants with properties optimized for prophylaxis, therapy, and cure applications.IMPORTANCEHIV-1 bNAbs have properties different from those of antiretroviral compounds. Specifically, antibodies can enlist immune effector cells to eliminate infected cells, whereas antiretroviral compounds simply interfere with various steps in the viral life cycle. Unfortunately, HIV-1 is adept at evading antibody recognition, limiting the utility of antibodies as a treatment for HIV-1 infection or as part of an effort to eradicate latently infected cells. eCD4-Ig is an antibody-like entry inhibitor that closely mimics HIV-1's obligate receptors. eCD4-Ig appears to be qualitatively different from antibodies, since it neutralizes all HIV-1, HIV-2, and SIV isolates. Here, we characterize three new structurally distinct eCD4-Ig variants and show that each excels in a key property useful to prevent, treat, or cure an HIV-1 infection. For example, one variant neutralized HIV-1 most efficiently, while others best enlisted natural killer cells to eliminate infected cells. These observations will help generate eCD4-Ig variants optimized for different clinical applications.

Download Full-text

HIV-1 Coreceptor Usage and Variable Loop Contact Impact V3 Loop Broadly Neutralizing Antibody Susceptibility

Journal of Virology ◽

10.1128/jvi.01604-19 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 94 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Ludy Registre ◽

Yvetane Moreau ◽

Sila Toksoz Ataca ◽

Surya Pulukuri ◽

Timothy J. Henrich ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Homology Modeling ◽

Neutralizing Antibody ◽

V3 Loop ◽

Plasma Viremia ◽

Neutralization Sensitivity ◽

Variable Loop ◽

Ccr5 Receptor ◽

Broadly Neutralizing Antibody ◽

Hiv 1 ◽

Homology Models

ABSTRACT In clinical trials, HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) effectively lower plasma viremia and delay virus reemergence. The presence of less neutralization-susceptible strains prior to treatment decreases the efficacy of these antibody-based treatments, but neutralization sensitivity often cannot be predicted by sequence analysis alone. We found that phenotypically confirmed CXCR4-utilizing strains are less neutralization sensitive, especially to variable loop 3 (V3 loop)-directed bnAbs, than exclusively CCR5-utilizing strains in some, but not all, cases. Homology modeling suggested that the primary V3 loop bnAb epitope is equally accessible among CCR5- and CXCR4-using strains, although variants that exclusively use CXCR4 have V3 loop protrusions that interfere with CCR5 receptor interactions. Homology modeling also showed that among some, but not all, envelopes with decreased neutralization sensitivity, V1 loop orientation interfered with V3 loop-directed bnAb binding. Thus, there are likely different structural reasons for the coreceptor usage restriction and the different bnAb susceptibilities. Importantly, we show that individuals harboring envelopes with higher likelihood of using CXCR4 or greater predicted V1 loop interference have faster virus rebound and a lower maximum decrease in plasma viremia, respectively, after treatment with a V3 loop bnAb. Knowledge of receptor usage and homology models may be useful in developing future algorithms that predict treatment efficacy with V3 loop bnAbs. IMPORTANCE The efficacy of HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibody (bnAb) therapies may be compromised by the preexistence of less susceptible variants. Sequence-based methods are needed to predict pretreatment variants’ neutralization sensitivities. HIV-1 strains that exclusively use the CXCR4 receptor rather than the CCR5 receptor are less neutralization susceptible, especially to variable loop 3 (V3 loop) bnAbs in some, but not all, instances. While the inability to utilize the CCR5 receptor maps to a predicted protrusion in the envelope V3 loop, this viral determinant does not directly influence V3 loop bnAb sensitivity. Homology modeling predicts that contact between the envelope V1 loop and the antibody impacts V3 loop bnAb susceptibility in some cases. Among pretreatment envelopes, increased probability of using CXCR4 and greater predicted V1 interference are associated with faster virus rebound and a smaller decrease in the plasma virus level, respectively, after V3 loop bnAb treatment. Receptor usage information and homology models may be useful for predicting V3 loop bnAb therapy efficacy.

Download Full-text

Epitope contiguous chains and antibody recognition in HIV-1 synthetic peptide antigens

Journal of Molecular Recognition ◽

10.1002/(sici)1099-1352(199634/12)9:5/6<631::aid-jmr312>3.0.co;2-n ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 9 (5-6) ◽

pp. 631-638 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Mabel Aleanzi ◽

Norma Perotti ◽

Alejandro Montaner ◽

Javier Lottersberger ◽

Georgina Tonarelli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Synthetic Peptide ◽

Peptide Antigens ◽

Antibody Recognition ◽

Hiv 1

Download Full-text

Increased Neutralization Sensitivity and Reduced Replicative Capacity of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 after Short-Term In Vivo or In Vitro Passage through Chimpanzees

Journal of Virology ◽

10.1128/jvi.74.17.7699-7707.2000 ◽

2000 ◽

Vol 74 (17) ◽

pp. 7699-7707 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Tim Beaumont ◽

Silvia Broersen ◽

Ad van Nuenen ◽

Han G. Huisman ◽

Ana-Maria de Roda Husman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type ◽

Virus Type ◽

Short Term ◽

Neutralization Sensitivity ◽

Immunodeficiency Virus ◽

Hiv 1

ABSTRACT Development of disease is extremely rare in chimpanzees when inoculated with either T-cell-line-adapted neutralization-sensitive or primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), at first excluding a role for HIV-1 neutralization sensitivity in the clinical course of infection. Interestingly, we observed that short-term in vivo and in vitro passage of primary HIV-1 isolates through chimpanzee peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) resulted in a neutralization-sensitive phenotype. Furthermore, an HIV-1 variant reisolated from a chimpanzee 10 years after experimental infection was still sensitive to neutralization by soluble CD4, the CD4 binding site recognizing antibody IgG1b12 and autologous chimpanzee serum samples, but had become relatively resistant to neutralization by polyclonal human sera and neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. The initial adaptation of HIV-1 to replicate in chimpanzee PBMC seemed to coincide with a selection for viruses with low replicative kinetics. Neither coreceptor usage nor the expression level of CD4, CCR5, or CXCR4 on chimpanzee PBMC compared to human cells could explain the phenotypic changes observed in these chimpanzee-passaged viruses. Our data suggest that the increased neutralization sensitivity of HIV-1 after replication in chimpanzee cells may in part contribute to the long-term asymptomatic HIV-1 infection in experimentally infected chimpanzees.

Download Full-text

Uninfected Bystander Cells Impact the Measurement of HIV-Specific Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity Responses

mBio ◽

10.1128/mbio.00358-18 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 9 (2) ◽

Cited By ~ 35

Author(s):

Jonathan Richard ◽

Jérémie Prévost ◽

Amy E. Baxter ◽

Benjamin von Bredow ◽

Shilei Ding ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Neutralizing Antibodies ◽

Ex Vivo ◽

Cellular Cytotoxicity ◽

Antibody Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity ◽

Antibody Recognition ◽

Vaccine Trials ◽

Infected Cells ◽

Bystander Cells ◽

Hiv 1

ABSTRACTThe conformation of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) substantially impacts antibody recognition and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) responses. In the absence of the CD4 receptor at the cell surface, primary Envs sample a “closed” conformation that occludes CD4-induced (CD4i) epitopes. The virus controls CD4 expression through the actions of Nef and Vpu accessory proteins, thus protecting infected cells from ADCC responses. However, gp120 shed from infected cells can bind to CD4 present on uninfected bystander cells, sensitizing them to ADCC mediated by CD4i antibodies (Abs). Therefore, we hypothesized that these bystander cells could impact the interpretation of ADCC measurements. To investigate this, we evaluated the ability of antibodies to CD4i epitopes and broadly neutralizing Abs (bNAbs) to mediate ADCC measured by five ADCC assays commonly used in the field. Our results indicate that the uninfected bystander cells coated with gp120 are efficiently recognized by the CD4i ligands but not the bNabs. Consequently, the uninfected bystander cells substantially affectin vitromeasurements made with ADCC assays that fail to identify responses against infected versus uninfected cells. Moreover, using an mRNA flow technique that detects productively infected cells, we found that the vast majority of HIV-1-infected cells inin vitrocultures orex vivosamples from HIV-1-infected individuals are CD4 negative and therefore do not expose significant levels of CD4i epitopes. Altogether, our results indicate that ADCC assays unable to differentiate responses against infected versus uninfected cells overestimate responses mediated by CD4i ligands.IMPORTANCEEmerging evidence supports a role for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) in protection against HIV-1 transmission and disease progression. However, there are conflicting reports regarding the ability of nonneutralizing antibodies targeting CD4-inducible (CD4i) Env epitopes to mediate ADCC. Here, we performed a side-by-side comparison of different methods currently being used in the field to measure ADCC responses to HIV-1. We found that assays which are unable to differentiate virus-infected from uninfected cells greatly overestimate ADCC responses mediated by antibodies to CD4i epitopes and underestimate responses mediated by broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs). Our results strongly argue for the use of assays that measure ADCC against HIV-1-infected cells expressing physiologically relevant conformations of Env to evaluate correlates of protection in vaccine trials.

Download Full-text