[2] Comparison of X-ray and NMR-determined nucleic acid structures

Author(s):  
Bruce A. Luxon ◽  
David G. Gorenstein
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Di Liu ◽  
Yaming Shao ◽  
Joseph A. Piccirilli ◽  
Yossi Weizmann

<p>Though advances in nanotechnology have enabled the construction of synthetic nucleic acid based nanoarchitectures with ever-increasing complexity for various applications, high-resolution structures are lacking due to the difficulty of obtaining good diffracting crystals. Here we report the design of RNA nanostructures based on homooligomerizable tiles from an RNA single-strand for X-ray determination. Three structures are solved to near-atomic resolution: a 2D parallelogram, an unexpectedly formed 3D nanobracelet, and a 3D nanocage. Structural details of their constituent motifs—such as kissing loops, branched kissing-loops and T-junctions—that resemble natural RNA motifs and resisted X-ray determination are revealed. This work unveils the largely unexplored potential of crystallography in gaining high-resolution feedback for nanostructure design and suggests a novel route to investigate RNA motif structures by configuring them into nanoarchitectures.</p>


Author(s):  
Noemi Bellassai ◽  
Roberta D’Agata ◽  
Giuseppe Spoto

AbstractNucleic acid nanotechnology designs and develops synthetic nucleic acid strands to fabricate nanosized functional systems. Structural properties and the conformational polymorphism of nucleic acid sequences are inherent characteristics that make nucleic acid nanostructures attractive systems in biosensing. This review critically discusses recent advances in biosensing derived from molecular beacon and DNA origami structures. Molecular beacons belong to a conventional class of nucleic acid structures used in biosensing, whereas DNA origami nanostructures are fabricated by fully exploiting possibilities offered by nucleic acid nanotechnology. We present nucleic acid scaffolds divided into conventional hairpin molecular beacons and DNA origami, and discuss some relevant examples by focusing on peculiar aspects exploited in biosensing applications. We also critically evaluate analytical uses of the synthetic nucleic acid structures in biosensing to point out similarities and differences between traditional hairpin nucleic acid sequences and DNA origami. Graphical abstract


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Volek ◽  
Sofia Kolesnikova ◽  
Katerina Svehlova ◽  
Pavel Srb ◽  
Ráchel Sgallová ◽  
...  

Abstract G-quadruplexes are noncanonical nucleic acid structures formed by stacked guanine tetrads. They are capable of a range of functions and thought to play widespread biological roles. This diversity raises an important question: what determines the biochemical specificity of G-quadruplex structures? The answer is particularly important from the perspective of biological regulation because genomes can contain hundreds of thousands of G-quadruplexes with a range of functions. Here we analyze the specificity of each sequence in a 496-member library of variants of a reference G-quadruplex with respect to five functions. Our analysis shows that the sequence requirements of G-quadruplexes with these functions are different from one another, with some mutations altering biochemical specificity by orders of magnitude. Mutations in tetrads have larger effects than mutations in loops, and changes in specificity are correlated with changes in multimeric state. To complement our biochemical data we determined the solution structure of a monomeric G-quadruplex from the library. The stacked and accessible tetrads rationalize why monomers tend to promote a model peroxidase reaction and generate fluorescence. Our experiments support a model in which the sequence requirements of G-quadruplexes with different functions are overlapping but distinct. This has implications for biological regulation, bioinformatics, and drug design.


1981 ◽  
Vol 367 (1 Quantum Chemi) ◽  
pp. 295-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Malhotra ◽  
R. Pearlstein ◽  
O. Kikuchi ◽  
S. N. Mohammad ◽  
Y. Nakata ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilhelm Guschlbauer ◽  
Jean-Francois Chantot ◽  
Danielle Thiele

ChemInform ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (49) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
Lina Lin ◽  
Jia Sheng ◽  
Zhen Huang

2014 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 704a
Author(s):  
Parisa Akhshi ◽  
Jaakko Uusitalo ◽  
Helgi Ingolfsson ◽  
Siewert-Jan Marrink ◽  
D. Peter Tieleman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document