The American Association of Diabetes Educators' National Diabetes Education Outcomes System: Application to practice

2000 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
ToddW. Weaver ◽  
PaulA. Upham ◽  
DonnaM. Tomky ◽  
MalindaM. Peeples ◽  
Kathryn Mulcahy
2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 794-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malinda Peeples ◽  
Donna Tomky ◽  
Kathy Mulcahy ◽  
Mark Peyrot ◽  
Linda Siminerio ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 00 (01) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary M Austin

Diabetes educators are healthcare professionals such as nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, exercise specialists, physicians, and social workers, who specialize in diabetes education and who make a significant contribution to the care and management of persons with diabetes. The specialty of diabetes education has advanced to be based increasingly on evidence and focussed on achieving desired outcomes.The emphasis on outcomes-based interventions comes from both the National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education,1which emphasizes program outcomes, and the Standards for Outcomes Measurement of Diabetes Self-Management Education2of the American Association of Diabetes Educators, which focusses on individual patient outcomes as well as the reporting of aggregate patient data.


2000 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 957-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathy Mulcahy ◽  
Malinda Peeples ◽  
Donna Tomky ◽  
Todd Weaver

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 775-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Fitzner

The purpose of this article is to provide a brief review of reliability and validity testing. These concepts are important to researchers who are choosing techniques and/or developing tools that will be applied and evaluated in diabetes education practice. Several types of reliability and validity testing are defined, and an easy-to-use check sheet is provided for research purposes. Following testing for the basic aspects of reliability and validity such as face and construct validity, a tool may be appropriate for use in practice settings. Those conducting comprehensive outcomes evaluations, however, may desire additional validation such as testing for external validity. Diabetes educators can and should incorporate rigorous testing for these important aspects when conducting assessments of techniques and tools relating to diabetes self-management training.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enza Gucciardi ◽  
Sherry Espin ◽  
Antonia Morganti ◽  
Linda Dorado

Background Specialised diabetes teams, specifically certified nurse and dietitian diabetes educator teams, are being integrated part-time into primary care to provide better care and support for Canadians living with diabetes. This practice model is being implemented throughout Canada in an effort to increase patient access to diabetes education, self-management training, and support. Interprofessional collaboration can have positive effects on both health processes and patient health outcomes, but few studies have explored how health professionals are introduced to and transition into this kind of interprofessional work. Method Data from 18 interviews with diabetes educators, 16 primary care physicians, 23 educators’ reflective journals, and 10 quarterly debriefing sessions were coded and analysed using a directed content analysis approach, facilitated by NVIVO software. Results Four major themes emerged related to challenges faced, strategies adopted, and benefits observed during this transition into interprofessional collaboration between diabetes educators and primary care physicians: (a) negotiating space, place, and role; (b) fostering working relationships; (c) performing collectively; and (d) enhancing knowledge exchange. Conclusions Our findings provide insight into how healthcare professionals who have not traditionally worked together in primary care are collaborating to integrate health services essential for diabetes management. Based on the experiences and personal reflections of participants, establishing new ways of working requires negotiating space and place to practice, role clarification, and frequent and effective modes of formal and informal communication to nurture the development of trust and mutual respect, which are vital to success.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Talal Alharbi ◽  
Gayle McLelland ◽  
Nikos Thomacos

Background: Diabetes education provided by qualified and competent diabetes educators (DEs) is effective in reducing risks of diabetes complications. Globally, the DE workforce comprises a mixture of professions, with the majority being nurses. It is necessary to regularly assess DEs’ competence and knowledge to ensure that quality diabetes education is being delivered. Objective: This study explored the self-perceived competence and the diabetes knowledge of DEs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods: This study explored the self-perceived competence and the diabetes knowledge of DEs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), using a quantitative, cross-sectional survey, administered at 20 diabetes centres. A total of 368 DEs were invited to participate in the study. Results: Surveys were completed by 324 DEs (response rate = 88%), 84% (n=271) were nurses. From a possible overall range between 63-252, the mean (M) was 168.59 and standard deviation (SD) was (35.6) hence perceived competence of the DEs was low, Of a maximum possible score of 45 for the diabetes knowledge test, response scores ranged from 9 to 40, with M = 26.2 (6.0). Perceived competence and diabetes knowledge varied depending on age, nationality, educational qualification, primary profession, and whether or not the DE held a specialised diabetes qualification. Conclusion: DEs in the KSA need to develop and enhance their competence and knowledge in order to provide quality diabetes care and education. The low perceived competence and scores in the knowledge test show that intervention measures are needed to regularly assess and improve the core competencies of DEs. Further research is required to identify DEs’ barriers to having sufficient competencies and knowledge.


2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 839-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice C. Zgibor ◽  
Mark Peyrot ◽  
Kristine Ruppert ◽  
William Noullet ◽  
Linda M. Siminerio ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document