National survey among people who use drugs (PWUD) on opioid substitution treatment (OST) on their knowledge of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and barriers for treatment in Bulgaria

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. S827-S828
Author(s):  
Marieta Simonova ◽  
Alexander Kantchelov ◽  
Georgi Vasilev ◽  
Borislava Peeva ◽  
Lyuba Hadzhiyska ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 2199-2205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Schulte ◽  
Christiane Sybille Schmidt ◽  
Lisa Strada ◽  
Moritz Rosenkranz ◽  
Ingo Schäfer ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly prevalent among people who inject drugs (PWID). Accurate data on HCV prevalence and incidence rates among patients receiving opioid substitution treatment (OST) are needed to estimate the current and future burden of HCV infections in this high-risk population. Methods Baseline data from routine care were collected between October 2014 and June 2016 from randomly selected OST facilities in Germany. The primary outcome measure was the HCV status (antibody and RNA prevalence). Patients who were HCV antibody–negative at baseline were followed up after 12 months to calculate the HCV incidence rate. Results Sixty-three facilities from 14 German Federal States provided clinical data for a total of 2466 OST patients. HCV antibody and HCV RNA prevalence were 58.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.8%–60.8%) and 27.3% (95% CI, 25.5%–29.2%), respectively. At baseline, a total of 528 patients (21.4%) had previously undergone antiviral treatment. Moreover, lower HCV RNA prevalence was associated with female gender, employment, younger age, and shorter duration of OST and opioid dependence. The HCV incidence rate was 2.5 cases per 100 person-years. Conclusions The low HCV RNA prevalence and HCV incidence rates confirm that OST in Germany is an effective setting both for treating chronic HCV infections and for preventing new infections among PWID. Scaling up the provision of OST, HCV testing, and HCV treatment among OST patients are important public health strategies for reducing HCV infections in this high-risk population.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona L. Shand ◽  
Carolyn Day ◽  
William Rawlinson ◽  
Louisa Degenhardt ◽  
Nicholas G. Martin ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e0166451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Håvard Midgard ◽  
Jørgen G. Bramness ◽  
Svetlana Skurtveit ◽  
John W. Haukeland ◽  
Olav Dalgard

1998 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1711-1715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M. Schneeberger ◽  
Ingrid Keur ◽  
Walter van der Vliet ◽  
Kitty van Hoek ◽  
Henk Boswijk ◽  
...  

A national survey of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections among dialysis patients in The Netherlands was performed. The study involved 2,653 patients (2,108 hemodialysis patients and 545 chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis [CAPD] patients) from 39 of the 49 dialysis centers in the country. Patient sera were analyzed by both serological and molecular methods. Screening by a third-generation enzyme immunoassay (EIA) yielded 79 reactive sera. The presence of anti-HCV antibodies was confirmed in 70 patients by a line immunoassay. All seropositive samples were tested by reverse transcriptase PCR, and 57 samples were found to contain HCV RNA. Of the nine EIA-positive and line immunoassay-negative or indeterminate samples, four were HCV RNA positive. All seronegative samples were screened for the presence of HCV RNA in pools of five sera. Of 2,576 antibody-negative samples, 6 contained HCV RNA. All antibody-positive and RNA-positive samples were also tested by a second serological assay. The prevalence of HCV infections among Dutch dialysis patients as determined by serology or the presence of HCV RNA was 3% (80 of 2,653), i.e., 3.5% (73 of 2,108) in patients treated on hemodialysis and 1.3% (7 of 545) in patients on CAPD. Of these 80 HCV-infected dialysis patients, 67 (84%) were HCV RNA positive. Serological screening alone would have diagnosed only 70 infected patients. Therefore, antibody screening combined with detection of HCV RNA should be considered as the “gold standard” for diagnosing HCV infection in dialysis patients. The prevalence of HCV-infected patients in Dutch dialysis centers ranged from 0 to 8%, suggesting the existence of local risk factors for acquiring HCV infection. Genotyping analysis by reverse hybridization line probe assay revealed the presence of genotypes 1a (23%), 1b (46%), 2 (3%), 2a (13%), 2b (1%), 3a (7%), and 4a (4%). In four (6%) samples multiple genotypes were detected. The genotype distribution of HCV isolates among Dutch dialysis patients was similar to the distribution among nondialysis patients from the Benelux, except for subtype 1a, which was significantly more prevalent among dialysis patients. In only one center, a high prevalence of an uncommon genotype was suggestive of infection from a common source.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document