Towards an automatic calibration procedure for constrained cellular automata

2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 149-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bas Straatman ◽  
Roger White ◽  
Guy Engelen
2013 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 1360037
Author(s):  
MIN-SOO LEE ◽  
WOON-YOUNG KWAK

This paper presents the method that can calibrate the weights (10 kg ~ 20 kg) automatically by a 3-axis robot, three weight carrier magazines. So the operators do not need to take an effort to align weight on the pan of the balance manually during calibration procedure, and can calibrate the weights automatically during night. The weight calibration system consists of a 3-axis robot, a weight magazine, and operating software to avoid temperature and air flow effect from human. At first the calibration system moves weight on the magazine to the pan of balance. Second measures the mass of the weight, and then moves the weight to the original position on the magazine automatically. This automatic moving method not only avoids the introduction of excess uncertainty, but also improves productivity. Hereafter the similar system can be applied to the calibration of other range weights (1 mg ~ 5 g).


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 9173-9218 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. V. Dung ◽  
B. Merz ◽  
A. Bárdossy ◽  
T. D. Thang ◽  
H. Apel

Abstract. Calibration of hydrodynamic models is – compared to other disciplines like e.g. hydrology – still underdeveloped. This has mainly two reasons: the lack of appropriate data and the large computational demand in terms of CPU-time. Both aspects are aggravated in large-scale applications. However, there are recent developments that improve the situation on both the data and computing side. Remote sensing, especially radar-based techniques proved to provide highly valuable information on flood extents, and in case high precision DEMs are present, also on spatially distributed inundation depths. On the computing side the use of parallelization techniques brought significant performance gains. In the presented study we build on these developments by calibrating a large-scale 1-D hydrodynamic model of the whole Mekong Delta downstream of Kratie in Cambodia: we combined in-situ data from a network of river gauging stations, i.e. data with high temporal but low spatial resolution, with a series of inundation maps derived from ENVISAT Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) satellite images, i.e. data with low temporal but high spatial resolution, in an multi-objective automatic calibration process. It is shown that an automatic, multi-objective calibration of hydrodynamic models, even of such complexity and on a large scale and complex as a model for the Mekong Delta, is possible. Furthermore, the calibration process revealed model deficiencies in the model structure, i.e. the representation of the dike system in Vietnam, which would have been difficult to detect by a standard manual calibration procedure.


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 3947-3961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Médard Bouda ◽  
Alain N. Rousseau ◽  
Silvio J. Gumiere ◽  
Patrick Gagnon ◽  
Brou Konan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 208-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles P. Newland ◽  
Aaron C. Zecchin ◽  
Holger R. Maier ◽  
Jeffrey P. Newman ◽  
Hedwig van Delden

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Royer-Gaspard ◽  
Vazken Andréassian ◽  
Guillaume Thirel

<p>It has been shown in various experiments that many conceptual rainfall-runoff models experience difficulties to simulate annual or longer-term variations of the streamflow (e.g. Coron et al., 2014). Whether this problem is inherent to the structure of the model in question or could be solved by a change of the calibration procedure is still a matter of debate: for example, the work of Coron (2013) tended to show that no parameter set able to solve the issue can be found, while Fowler et al. (2018) argued that such parameter sets exist, and should be identifiable by a change of objective function.</p><p>The aim of this study is to explore further the existence of such a parameter set in the case of the GR4J model (Perrin et al., 2003). Parameters sets were in particular tested against their ability to provide efficient (i.e. with good performance) and robust (i.e. transposable in time) discharge simulations over three flow ranges (low, mean and high flows). To this purpose, a large number of parameters sets of GR4J were sampled in 545 French and Australian catchments. The obtained performances were confronted to those obtained with automatic calibration with a range of objective functions focusing on diverse streamflow ranges.</p><p>Because of our large catchment set, we were able to identify a variety of cases: catchments for which highly robust parameter sets exist, catchments for which relatively robust parameter sets exist, and catchments for which no robust parameter sets can be found. Compared to the best sampled parameters sets, those derived through automatic calibration often yielded poorer performances regarding at the same time efficiency and robustness of the discharge simulations over the three flow ranges. We discuss the link between model failures and catchments characteristics, as well as the ability of the GR4J model to adequately simulate streamflow on different timescales and flow regimes.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Cornaro ◽  
Francesco Bosco ◽  
Marco Lauria ◽  
Valerio Adoo Puggioni ◽  
Livio De Santoli

Energy reduction can benefit from the improvement of energy efficiency in buildings. For this purpose, simulation models can be used both as diagnostic and prognostic tools, reproducing the behaviour of the real building as accurately as possible. High modelling accuracy can be achieved only through calibration. Two approaches can be adopted—manual or automatic. Manual calibration consists of an iterative trial and error procedure that requires high skill and expertise of the modeler. Automatic calibration relies on mathematical and statistical methods that mostly use optimization algorithms to minimize the difference between measured and simulated data. This paper aims to compare a manual calibration procedure with an automatic calibration method developed by the authors, coupling dynamic simulation, sensitivity analysis and automatic optimization using IDA ICE, Matlab and GenOpt respectively. Differences, advantages and disadvantages are evidenced applying both methods to a dynamic simulation model of a real office building in Rome, Italy. Although both methods require high expertise from operators and showed good results in terms of accuracy, automatic calibration presents better performance and consistently helps with speeding up the procedure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document