PP095-MON: Randomized, Controlled Trial Investigating the Effect of Preoperative Oral Immunonutrition on Complications and Length of Hospital Stay after Elective Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. S165
Author(s):  
J. Gade ◽  
T. Levring ◽  
J. Hillingsø ◽  
C.P. Hansen ◽  
J.R. Andersen
2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar A. Cano-Torres ◽  
Luis E. Simental-Mendía ◽  
Luis A. Morales-Garza ◽  
José M. Ramos-Delgado ◽  
Mirthala M. Reyes-Gonzalez ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 3373-3378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamideh Abbaspour Kasgari ◽  
Siavash Moradi ◽  
Amir Mohammad Shabani ◽  
Farhang Babamahmoodi ◽  
Ali Reza Davoudi Badabi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background New therapeutic options are urgently needed to tackle the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Repurposing existing pharmaceuticals provides an immediate treatment opportunity. We assessed the efficacy of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir with ribavirin for treating patients with COVID-19. Methods This was a single-centre, randomized controlled trial in adults with moderate COVID-19 admitted to the Ghaem Shahr Razi Hospital in Mazandaran Province, Iran. Patients were randomly assigned to 400 mg sofosbuvir, 60 mg daclatasvir and 1200 mg ribavirin (intervention group) or to standard care (control group). The primary endpoint of this study was length of hospital stay. This study is registered by IRCT.ir under the ID: IRCT20200328046886N1. Results Between 20 March 2020 and 8 April 2020, 48 patients were recruited; 24 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 24 to the control group. The median duration of hospital stay was 6 days in both groups (P = 0.398). The number of ICU admissions in the sofosbuvir/daclatasvir/ribavirin group was not significantly lower than the control group (0 versus 4, P = 0.109). There was no difference in the number of deaths between the groups (0 versus 3, P = 0.234). The cumulative incidence of recovery was higher in the sofosbuvir/daclatasvir/ribavirin arm (Gray’s P = 0.033). Conclusions This randomized trial was too small to make definitive conclusions. There were trends in favour of the sofosbuvir/daclatasvir/ribavirin arm for recovery and lower death rates. However, there was an imbalance in the baseline characteristics between the arms. Larger randomized trials should be conducted to investigate this treatment further.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
bo shu pan ◽  
LI CHUN WU ◽  
chen da zhou ◽  
ru qi xiong ◽  
ping xiao geng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : The advantages of laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy (LLH) for treating hepatolithiasis in terms of the time to functional recovery , postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS), morbidity, long-term abdominal wall hernias, hospital costs, residual stone rate and recurrence of calculus have not been confirmed by a randomized controlled trial. The aim of this trial is to compare the safety and effectiveness of LLH to those of open left-sided hepatectomy (OLH) for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. Methods: Patients with hepatolithiasis eligible for left-sided hepatectomy will be recruited. The experimental design will produce two randomized arms (laparoscopic and open hepatectomy) at a 1:1 ratio and a prospective registry. All patients will undergo surgery in the setting of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. The prospective registry will be based on patients who cannot be randomized because of the explicit treatment preference of the patient or surgeon or because of ineligibility (not meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria) for randomization in this trial. The primary outcome is the time to functional recovery. The secondary outcomes are LOS, percentage readmission, morbidity, mortality, hospital costs, long-term incidence of incisional hernias, residual stone rate and recurrence of calculus. It will be assumed that, in patients undergoing LLH, the length of hospital stay will be reduced by 1.3 days. A sample size of 44 patients in each randomization arm has been calculated as sufficient to detect a 1.3-day reduction in LOS (90% power and α = 0.05 (two-tailed)). The trial is a randomized controlled trial that will provide evidence for the merits of laparoscopic surgery in patients undergoing liver resection within an ERAS program. Discussion: Although the outcomes of LLH have been proven to be comparable to those of OLH in retrospective studies, the use of LLH remains restricted, partly due to the lack of short-and long-term informative RCTs pertaining to patients with hepatolithiasis in ERAS programs. To evaluate the surgical and long-term outcomes of LLH, we will perform a prospective RCT to compare LLH with OLH for hepatolithiasis within an ERAS program. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03958825 . Keywords: Laparoscopic, open liver resection, ERAS, Hepatectomy


2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine P. Ricero-Luistro ◽  
Maria Esterlita T. Villanueva-Uy ◽  
Aurora Gloria I. Libadia ◽  
Socorro De Leon-Mendoza

Background. Prematurity is a major cause of neonatal death. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the recognized initial intervention among preterm neonates in respiratory distress. Kangaroo mother care (KMC) may help improve neonatal outcomes. Objective. To determine the effectiveness of KMC in reducing morbidity and mortality among preterm neonates on CPAP via RAM nasal cannula (nCPAP). Methods. A prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted on eligible preterm neonates requiring nCPAP due to respiratory distress. They were randomly allocated to either KMC (n=35) or conventional care groups (n=35). Outcome measures included duration of nCPAP and oxygen support, physiologic parameters, morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay. Results. The durations of nCPAP and oxygen support were both significantly shorter in the KMC group. Morbidities (air leak syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, and late-onset sepsis) were also significantly lower in the KMC group. Although the mortality rate and the hospital stay were lower in the KMC group, these were not statistically significant. Conclusion. KMC effectively decreased the duration of nCPAP and oxygen support, as well as the incidence of neonatal morbidities. There were trends towards reduced mortality and length of hospital stay in the neonates who received KMC.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-bo Pan ◽  
Chun-li Wu ◽  
Da-chen Zhou ◽  
Qi-ru Xiong ◽  
Xiao-ping Geng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The advantages of laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy (LLH) for treating hepatolithiasis in terms of the time to postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS), morbidity, long-term abdominal wall hernias, hospital costs, residual stone rate and recurrence of calculus have not been confirmed by a randomized controlled trial. The aim of this trial is to compare the safety and effectiveness of LLH to those of open left-sided hepatectomy (OLH) for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. Methods: Patients with hepatolithiasis eligible for left-sided hepatectomy will be recruited. The experimental design will produce two randomized arms (laparoscopic and open hepatectomy) at a 1:1 ratio and a prospective registry. All patients will undergo surgery in the setting of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. The prospective registry will be based on patients who cannot be randomized because of the explicit treatment preference of the patient or surgeon or because of ineligibility (not meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria) for randomization in this trial. The primary outcome is the LOS. The secondary outcomes are percentage readmission, morbidity, mortality, hospital costs, long-term incidence of incisional hernias, residual stone rate and recurrence of calculus. It will be assumed that, in patients undergoing LLH, the length of hospital stay will be reduced by 1.3 days. A sample size of 44 patients in each randomization arm has been calculated as sufficient to detect a 1.3-day reduction in LOS (90% power and α = 0.05 (two-tailed)). The trial is a randomized controlled trial that will provide evidence for the merits of laparoscopic surgery in patients undergoing liver resection within an ERAS program. Discussion: Although the outcomes of LLH have been proven to be comparable to those of OLH in retrospective studies, the use of LLH remains restricted, partly due to the lack of short-and long-term informative RCTs pertaining to patients with hepatolithiasis in ERAS programs. To evaluate the surgical and long-term outcomes of LLH, we will perform a prospective RCT to compare LLH with OLH for hepatolithiasis within an ERAS program.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03958825. Registered on 21 May 2019.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document