Rotational kinematic hardening model for sand. Part II Characteristic work hardening law and predictions

1997 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinan Inel ◽  
Poul V. Lade
1989 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 470-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Schulson

The lower yield strengths of Ni3Al and mild steel and their respective relationships to (grain size)−0.8 and (grain size)−0.5 are explained in terms of work hardening within Lüders bands.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 2834
Author(s):  
Mohsen Saleh Asheghabadi ◽  
Xiaohui Cheng

In this study, a soil–tunnel model for clay under earthquake loading is analyzed, using finite element methods and a kinematic hardening model with the Von Mises failure criterion. The results are compared with those from the linear elastic–perfectly plastic Mohr–Coulomb model. The latter model does not consider the stiffness degradation caused by imposing cyclic loading and unloading to the soil, whereas the kinematic hardening model can simulate this stiffness degradation. The parameters of the kinematic hardening model are calibrated based on the results of experimental cyclic tests and finite element simulation. Here, two methods—one using data from cyclic shear tests, and the other a new method using undrained cyclic triaxial tests—are used to calibrate the parameters. The parameters investigated are the peak ground acceleration (PGA), tunnel lining thickness, tunnel shape, and tunnel embedment depth, all of which have an effect on the resistance of the shallow tunnel to the stresses and deformations caused by the surrounding clay soils. The results show that unlike traditional models, the nonlinear kinematic hardening model can predict the response reasonably well, and it is able to create the hysteresis loops and consider the soil stiffness degradation under the seismic loads.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document