In vivo alanine/EPR dosimetry in daily clinical practice: a feasibility study

Author(s):  
Bartlomiej Ciesielski ◽  
Katarzyna Schultka ◽  
Anna Kobierska ◽  
Renata Nowak ◽  
Zofia Peimel-Stuglik
2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 587-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Santangelo ◽  
Alessandro Dell'Edera ◽  
Arianna Sala ◽  
Giordano Cecchetti ◽  
Federico Masserini ◽  
...  

Background: The incoming disease-modifying therapies against Alzheimer’s disease (AD) require reliable diagnostic markers to correctly enroll patients all over the world. CSF AD biomarkers, namely amyloid-β 42 (Aβ42), total tau (t-tau), and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181), showed good diagnostic accuracy in detecting AD pathology, but their real usefulness in daily clinical practice is still a matter of debate. Therefore, further validation in complex clinical settings, that is patients with different types of dementia, is needed to uphold their future worldwide adoption. Methods: We measured CSF AD biomarkers’ concentrations in a sample of 526 patients with a clinical diagnosis of dementia (277 with AD and 249 with Other Type of Dementia, OTD). Brain FDG-PET was also considered in a subsample of 54 patients with a mismatch between the clinical diagnosis and the CSF findings. Results: A p-tau181/Aβ42 ratio higher than 0.13 showed the best diagnostic performance in differentiating AD from OTD (86% accuracy index, 74% sensitivity, 81% specificity). In cases with a mismatch between clinical diagnosis and CSF findings, brain FDG-PET partially agreed with the p-tau181/Aβ42 ratio, thus determining an increase in CSF accuracy. Conclusions: The p-tau181/Aβ42 ratio alone might reliably detect AD pathology in heterogeneous samples of patients suffering from different types of dementia. It might constitute a simple, cost-effective and reproducible in vivo proxy of AD suitable to be adopted worldwide not only in daily clinical practice but also in future experimental trials, to avoid the enrolment of misdiagnosed AD patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 134-135
Author(s):  
M.D. Falco ◽  
S. Giancaterino ◽  
A. De Nicola ◽  
N. Adorante ◽  
R. Gimenez De Lorenzo ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. S512-S513
Author(s):  
I. Olaciregui ◽  
Y. Szeto ◽  
A. Mans ◽  
R. Tielenburg ◽  
R. Vijlbrief ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-416
Author(s):  
Tony Ibrahim ◽  
Abir Ahmadie ◽  
Elie Rassy ◽  
Fadi El Karak ◽  
Colette Hanna ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. S941
Author(s):  
M.D. Falco ◽  
S. Giancaterino ◽  
A. De Nicola ◽  
N. Adorante ◽  
R. Gimenez De Lorenzo ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 153303381877920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria D. Falco ◽  
Stefano Giancaterino ◽  
Andrea De Nicola ◽  
Nico Adorante ◽  
Ramon Gimenez De Lorenzo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evgenii Belykh ◽  
Xiaochun Zhao ◽  
Brandon Ngo ◽  
Dara S. Farhadi ◽  
Adam Kindelin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document