scholarly journals A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF LOW FLOW, LOW GRADIENT SEVERE AORTIC STENOSIS WITH NORMAL EJECTION FRACTION: MORTALITY AND NEED FOR VALVE REPLACEMENT, A SINGLE CENTER STUDY

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. A1944
Author(s):  
Jorge Romero ◽  
Patricia Chavez ◽  
Faraj Kargoli ◽  
Anjani Golive ◽  
Carlos Manrique ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaher Fanari ◽  
Dimitrios Barmpouletos ◽  
Vivek K Reddy ◽  
Sumaya Hammami ◽  
Zugui Zhang ◽  
...  

Background: The impact of aortic valve replacement (AVR) versus medical management (MM) in patients with paradoxical low flow is unclear. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of AVR versus MM in patients with severe aortic stenosis and normal ejection fraction and different transaortic flow and gradient. Methods: We identified consecutive patients presenting to our echo lab with an aortic valve area (AVA) < 1.0cm 2 and EF≥ 50%. We stratify patients depending on gradient (≥ 40 vs. < 40 mmHg) and stroke volume index (SVI < 35 vs. ≥35 ml/m 2 ). 4 groups were identified (, normal flow, high gradient [NF/HG]; normal flow, low gradient [NF/LG]; low flow, high gradient [LF/HG] and low flow, low gradient [LF/LG]. These 4 groups were also stratified depending on management (AVR vs. MM). All patients were retrospectively followed for the occurrence of death. Results: A total of 954 patients were included in analysis. Mean follow up was 2.45 ± 1.9 years. The mean age was 75.4 ± 5.6 years. Comparing all 4 AS subgroups, the mortality was higher in LF/HG followed by LF/LG, NF/HG and NF/LG (LF/HG 37.1% vs. LF/LG 33.9% vs. NF/HG 30.3%vs. NF/LG 20.2%; Log Rank Test, P=0.003). Patients who underwent medical therapy have a higher mortality than the overall cohort in all subgroups (LF/HG 44.3% vs. NF/HG 36.6% vs. LF/LG 33.7% vs. NF/LG 21.2%; Log Rank Test, P=0.001). Patients with HG had a higher chance of getting aortic valve replacement (AVR) than those with LF/LG and NF/LG (20.7% NF/HG vs. 10.6% LF/HG vs. 4.7% LF/LG and 3.6% NF/LG; P=0.01). Patients who underwent AVR had lower mortality rates when compared with the overall cohort in all subgroups (LF/HG 21.4% vs. 18.9% NF/HG vs. 6.6% LF/LG and 7.1% NF/LG; Log Rank Test, P= 0.253). Conclusion: Patients with LF/LG represent an under-recognized high-risk group with similar prognosis to NF/HG. Although these patients may benefit tremendously from AVR, they are less likely to undergo AVR when compared to HG patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Jadav ◽  
L Nhola ◽  
J Thaden ◽  
P Pellikka ◽  
P Pislaru ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The left ventricle (LV) undergoes different types of remodeling to normalize its wall stress. There has been an increase in the trend in research regarding the process of remodeling but little is known about how LV volumes and global longitudinal strain (GLS) may vary depending upon the type of remodeling. Purpose To define the values of LV volumes and GLS in patients with different types of LV remodeling with normal ejection fraction (EF). Methods Single center retrospective study conducted from 2008 to 2018. We selected 10,356 subjects >18 years (5808 females, 4548 males) with normal EF and who underwent 2D echocardiography (2DE) at Mayo clinic, Rochester. They were categorized into 4 groups (Figure) i.e., group 1 = normal geometry, group 2 = concentric remodeling, group 3 = concentric hypertrophy, group 4 = eccentric hypertrophy based on their LV mass index (102 g/m2 in males, 88 g/m2 in females) and relative wall thickness (0.42) values measured by 2DE (figure). The patterns of LV GLS, end diastolic and end systolic volumes (EDV, ESV) indexed to body surface area were analyzed in these four groups by gender and body mass index (BMI). Mean±SD, One-way Anova, two sample t-test and Tukey- Kramer HSD were applied. Results The mean age of the selected population is 57.9 years ±14.9 (females=57.7±14.7, males=58.2±15.1) and the body surface area of 1.9 m2±0.2 (females=1.8±2 and males=2.1±0.2). The LV GLS values (Figure) of groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were −20.7, −18.9, −17.5 and −19.9 and their EDV cc/m2 values were 63.6, 58.5, 61.2 and 68.2 respectively. LV GLS and Biplane EF values were higher in females while Biplane EDV and ESV were higher in males. When each gender is sub-divided based on their BMI (<25 and ≥25), the LV GLS, EDV and ESV values were higher in all groups with BMI<25 except in males with concentric remodeling and females with concentric hypertrophy where they were low. Remodeling distribution Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the biggest single center study to evaluate LV GLS and volumes based on type of remodeling by gender and BMI. When compared with normal geometry, LV volumes and GLS values were statistically different among each type of remodeling as well as for gender and BMI. These results can be used as reference values in patient population studies where remodeling is being analyzed in subjects with normal LV EF. Acknowledgement/Funding None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document