scholarly journals Two-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of the size, function and shape of the left ventricle in chronic aortic regurgitation: Comparison with radionuclide angiography

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 1195-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Luc Vandenbossche ◽  
Barry L. Kramer ◽  
Barry M. Massie ◽  
D. Lynn Morris ◽  
Joel S. Karliner
The Clinician ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 57-68
Author(s):  
G. A. Ignatenko ◽  
N. T. Vatutin ◽  
G. G. Taradin ◽  
A. N. Shevelok ◽  
I. V. Rakitskaya

The presented review concerns aortic regurgitation which occupies a significant place in the structure of valvular heart disease. The detailed anatomic and physiologic description of the aortic valve is provided. The characteristics of sinotubular, ventricular-aortic junctions, and virtual aortic annulus are presented. There are data about prevalence of aortic regurgitation on the basis of results of population studies, indicating the increase in incidence of aortic regurgitation among individuals older 70–74 years. The detailed etiologic structure of this valvular pathology is described with specifying of the most common causes of both aortic disease and aortic cusps alterations. In particular, there are some aortic diseases, resulting in acute aortic regurgitation, including acute aortic dissection and paravalvular regurgitation in incompetence of the prosthetic aortic valve; in chronic one – idiopathic dilation of the aortic root, inherited connective tissue dysplasias (Ehlers–Danlos, Marfan, and Loeys–Dietz syndromes), bicuspid aortic valve, aortitis of various origin, seronegative arthropathies (reactive, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis) etc. Infective endocarditis and traumatic exposure are commonly responsible for development of acute regurgitation due to aortic cusps abnormalities. Chronic aortic regurgitation as a consequence valve defects occurs in rheumatic heart disease, degenerative changes, congenital anomalies, systemic connective tissue diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis), non-specific aortoarteritis, etc. The special attention is paid to pathophysiologic features of acute and chronic aortic regurgitation in the review. Acute aortic regurgitation is characterized by sudden increase in end-diastolic volume and due to the noncompliant left ventricle of normal size, it undergoes abrupt exposure a significant pre-load and after-load which results in decrease of left ventricle systolic function and stroke volume despite on relative preservation of contractile function of myocardium. In contrast to acute aortic regurgitation it is remarkable in its chronic form slow, progressive influence by increased overload of the left ventricle with possibility to adapt driven by its gradual dilation and hypertrophy.


2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Kui Zhang ◽  
Li-Na Li ◽  
Hui Xue ◽  
Xiu-Jie Tang ◽  
He Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Aortic valve replacement (AVR) for chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) with a severe dilated left ventricle and dysfunction leads to left ventricle remodeling. But there are rarely reports on the left ventricle reverse remodeling (LVRR) after AVR. This study aimed to investigate the LVRR and outcomes in chronic AR patients with severe dilated left ventricle and dysfunction after AVR. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical datum of chronic aortic regurgitation patients who underwent isolated AVR. The LVRR was defined as an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at least 10 points or a follow-up LVEF ≥ 50%, and a decrease in the indexed left ventricular end-diastolic diameter of at least 10%, or an indexed left ventricular end-diastolic diameter ≤ 33 mm/m2. The changes in echocardiographic parameters after AVR, survival analysis, the predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), the association between LVRR and MACE were analyzed. Results Sixty-nine patients with severe dilated left ventricle and dysfunction underwent isolated AVR. LV remodeling in 54 patients and no LV remodeling in 15 patients at 6–12 months follow-up. The preoperative left ventricular dimensions and volumes were larger, and the EF was lower in the LV no remodeling group than those in the LV remodeling group (all p < 0.05). The adverse LVRR was the predictor for MACE at follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 47.29 months (range 6 to 173 months). The rate of freedom from MACE was 94.44% at 5 years and 92.59% at 10 years in the remodeling group, 60% at 5 years, and 46.67% at 10 years in the no remodeling group. Conclusions The left ventricle remodeling after AVR was the important predictor for MACE. LV no remodeling may not be associated with benefits from AVR for chronic aortic regurgitation patients with severe dilated LV and dysfunction.


2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (03) ◽  
pp. 171-176
Author(s):  
Hsi-Yu Yu ◽  
Jaw-Lin Wang

Background: Patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) usually have dilated left ventricle due to volume overload. Some of them will reduce in size after elimination of regurgitation, but others not. The present study evaluated the hypothesis that left ventricle end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricle end-systolic diameter (LVESD) are related to left ventricle's peak stress (σ) both before and after operation. Methods: Sixty-eight patients with chronic aortic regurgitation receiving valve replacement were included in the study. LVEDD, LVESD, and σ were determined by echocardiography and cuff sphygmomanometer measurement before and beyond 6 months after operation. Results: The results showed that LVEDD, LVESD, and σ were decreased after the operation. In addition, σ and LVEDD had good linear correlation (for pre-operative data, σ = -3.02 + 0.286* LVEDD , R = 0.556, P < 0.001; for post-operative data, σ = -11.4 + 0.474* LVEDD , R = 0.736, P < 0.001). Conclusion: LVEDD and σ had a linear relationship before and after valve replacement operation for AR patients. The higher slope in linear regression equation for post-operative σ–LVEDD relationship than that for pre-operative data may indicate improved myocardial contractile efficiency after the operation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tolga Sinan Güvenç ◽  
Denizhan Karaçimen ◽  
Hatice Betül Erer ◽  
Erkan İlhan ◽  
Nurten Sayar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document