Hospitalization for Acute Diverticulitis Does Not Mandate Routine Elective Colectomy

IntroductionAcute diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon is increasingly treated by a non-operative approach. The need for colectomy after recovery from a flare of acute diverticulitis of the left colon, complicated diverticular abscess is still controversial. The primary aim of this study is to assess the risk of interval emergency surgery by systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods and analysisThe systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE will be screened for the predefined searching term: (Diverticulitis OR Diverticulum) AND (Abscess OR pelvic abscess OR pericolic abscess OR intraabdominal abscess) AND (surgery OR operation OR sigmoidectomy OR drainage OR percutaneous drainage OR conservative therapy OR watchful waiting). All studies published in an English or German-speaking peer-reviewed journal will be suitable for this analysis. Case reports, case series of less than five patients, studies without follow-up information, systematic and non-systematic reviews and meta-analyses will be excluded. Primary endpoint is the rate of interval emergency surgery. Using the Review Manager Software (Review Manager/RevMan, V.5.3, Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012) meta-analysis will be pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method for random effects. The Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool will be used to assess methodological quality of non-randomised studies. Risk of bias in randomised studies will be assessed using the Cochrane developed RoB 2-tool.Ethics and disseminationAs no new data are being collected, ethical approval is exempt for this study. This systematic review is to provide a new insight on the need for surgical treatment after a first attack of acute diverticulitis, complicated by intra-abdominal or pelvic abscesses. The results of this study will be presented at national and international meetings and published in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020164813.

Download Full-text

Role of MSCT in the diagnosis of perforated gall bladder (a retrospective study)

Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine ◽

10.1186/s43055-019-0128-2 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 51 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Mohamed M. Harraz ◽

Ahmed H. Abouissa

Keyword(s):

Computed Tomography ◽

Retrospective Study ◽

Gall Bladder ◽

Acute Cholecystitis ◽

Acute Diverticulitis ◽

Wall Thickening ◽

Free Fluid ◽

Iodinated Contrast ◽

Contrast Enhanced

Abstract Background Although gall bladder perforation (GBP) is not common, it is considered a life-threating condition, and the possibility of occurrence in cases of acute cholecystitis must be considered. The aim of this study was to assess the role of multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) in the assessment of GBP. Results It is a retrospective study including 19 patients that had GBP out of 147, there were 11 females (57.8%) and 8 males (42.1%), aged 42 to 79 year (mean age 60) presented with acute abdomen or acute cholecystitis. All patients were examined with abdominal ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced abdominal MSCT after written informed consent was obtained from the patients. This study was between January and December 2018. Patients with contraindications to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) (pregnancy, acute kidney failure, or allergy to iodinated contrast agents) who underwent US only were excluded. Patients with other diagnoses, such as acute diverticulitis of the right-sided colon or acute appendicitis, were excluded. The radiological findings were evaluated such as GB distention; stones; wall thickening, enhancement, and defect; pericholecystic free fluid or collection; enhancement of liver parenchyma; and air in the wall or lumen. All CT findings are compared with the surgical results. Our results revealed that the most important and diagnostic MSCT finding in GBP is a mural defect. Nineteen patients were proved surgically to have GBP. Conclusion GBP is a rare but very serious condition and should be diagnosed and treated as soon as possible to decrease morbidity and mortality. The most accurate diagnostic tool is the CT, MSCT findings most specific and sensitive for the detection of GBP and its complications.

Download Full-text

THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE DIVERTICULITIS

The Medical Journal of Australia ◽

10.5694/j.1326-5377.1963.tb23511.x ◽

1963 ◽

Vol 1 (25) ◽

pp. 946-947

Keyword(s):

Surgical Management ◽

Acute Diverticulitis

Download Full-text

Comparison of colonoscopy after colonic diverticulitis and positive fecal immunochemical tests for the detection of colorectal neoplasia

Endoscopy International Open ◽

10.1055/a-1333-1108 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 09 (03) ◽

pp. E331-E337

Author(s):

Dai Nakamatsu ◽

Tsutomu Nishida ◽

Shinji Kuriki ◽

Li-sa Chang ◽

Kazuki Aochi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Detection Rate ◽

Colorectal Neoplasia ◽

Acute Diverticulitis ◽

Colonic Diverticulitis ◽

Detection Rates ◽

Positive Group ◽

Asymptomatic Patients ◽

Polyp Detection Rate ◽

Adenoma Detection ◽

Acute Colonic Diverticulitis

Abstract Background and study aims The relationship between acute colonic diverticulitis and colorectal cancer (CRC) is unclear, but colonoscopy is recommended to exclude malignancy. We compared the detection rates for colorectal neoplasia in patients with colonic diverticulitis and asymptomatic patients who had positive fecal immunochemical tests (FITs). Patients and methods In total, 282 patients with acute colonic diverticulitis were hospitalized in our hospital from February 2011 to December 2019. Of them, 143 patients with diverticulitis and 1819 with positive FITs patients during the same period underwent colonoscopy without a prior colonoscopy within 5 years. We retrospectively compared these patients in terms of the invasive CRC rate, advanced neoplasia detection rate (ANDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and polyp detection rate (PDR). Results Compared to the diverticulitis group, the FIT-positive group had a significantly higher CRC rate (0 vs 2.7 %, P = 0.0061), ANDR (5.6 vs. 14.0 %, P = 0.0017), ADR (19.6 vs. 53.2 %, P < .0001), and PDR (44.1 vs. 91.0 %, P < .0001). Using 1:1 propensity score matching based on age and sex, we obtained 276 matched patients in both groups. After matching, no difference was found in the CRC rate (0 vs 0.7 %) or ANDR (5.8 vs 7.3 %) between groups, but the ADR and PDR were significantly higher in the FIT-positive group (20.3 vs 43.5 %, P < .0001; 45.7 % vs 86.2 %, P < .0001). Conclusion Patients with acute diverticulitis had lower ADRs and PDRs than patients with positive FITs.

Download Full-text

Sa1157 To Scope or Not to Scope? Finding Answers on Acute Diverticulitis

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ◽

10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.321 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 83 (5) ◽

pp. AB234

Author(s):

Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves ◽

Mara Barbosa ◽

Carla M. Marinho ◽

José Cotter

Keyword(s):

Acute Diverticulitis

Download Full-text

Acute Diverticulitis in Young Patients: A Review of the Changing Epidemiology and Etiology

Digestive Diseases and Sciences ◽

10.1007/s10620-021-06956-w ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Greg A. Turner ◽

Michael J. O’Grady ◽

Rachel V. Purcell ◽

Frank A. Frizelle

Keyword(s):

Acute Diverticulitis ◽

Young Patients

Download Full-text

Hospitalization for Acute Diverticulitis Does Not Mandate Routine Elective Colectomy

Acute Diverticulitis of the Left Colon: Value of the Initial CT and Timing of Elective Colectomy

Elective colectomy after acute diverticulitis: an international comparison