Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic low molecular weight heparin in pregnant women with a prior history of venous thromboembolism

2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 ◽  
pp. 335-336
Author(s):  
G.L. Moneta
2005 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 503-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Johnston ◽  
Patrick Brill-Edwards ◽  
Jeffrey S. Ginsberg ◽  
Stephen G. Pauker ◽  
Mark H. Eckman

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Stav Gazal ◽  
Eyal Lebel ◽  
Yosef Kalish ◽  
Chen Makranz ◽  
Moshe E. Gatt ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent, potentially lethal complication in individuals with cancer. Patients with brain tumors are at particularly high risk for VTE. Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare subtype of diffuse large B cell lymphoma, involving the craniospinal axis. The incidence of VTE in patients with PCNSL was reported as very high, occurring mostly in the early period of therapy. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) throughout the treatment of PCNSL. <b><i>Patients:</i></b> All patients &#x3e;18 years of age diagnosed and treated for PCNSL at our institution in 2005–2017 were included. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There were 44 patients; mean age at diagnosis was 61.5 years. Three patients (6.8%) had a personal history of thrombosis, 11 (25%) had a history of diabetes or smoking, and 32 (72%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 at diagnosis. During treatment with LMWH, no VTE events were recorded; 2 (4.5%) patients experienced a minor bleeding event and 1 (2.3%) a major bleeding event. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Among our 44 patients with PCNSL treated with prophylactic LMWH, no VTE events were recorded, and only 1 (asymptomatic) intracranial bleed was recorded. Within the limitations of a retrospective nonrandomized study, our findings suggest that VTE prophylaxis may be beneficial for individuals with PCNSL.


2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (03) ◽  
pp. 592-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Smith ◽  
Jacques Cornuz ◽  
Mark Roberts ◽  
Drahomir Aujesky

SummaryAlthough extended secondary prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin was recently shown to be more effective than warfarin for cancer-related venous thromboembolism, its cost-effectiveness compared to traditional prophylaxis with warfarin is uncertain. We built a decision analytic model to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes of a 6-month course of low-molecular-weight heparin or warfarin therapy in 65-year-old patients with cancer-related venous thromboembolism. We used probability estimates and utilities reported in the literature and published cost data. Using a US societal perspective, we compared strategies based on quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and lifetime costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of low-molecular-weight heparin compared with warfarin was $149, 865/QALY. Low-molecular-weight heparin yielded a quality-adjusted life expectancy of 1.097 QALYs at the cost of $15, 329. Overall, 46% ($7108) of the total costs associated with low-molecular-weight heparin were attributable to pharmacy costs. Although the low-molecular-weigh heparin strategy achieved a higher incremental quality-adjusted life expectancy than the warfarin strategy (difference of 0.051 QALYs), this clinical benefit was offset by a substantial cost increment of $7,609. Cost-effectiveness results were sensitive to variation of the early mortality risks associated with low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin and the pharmacy costs for low-molecular-weight heparin. Based on the best available evidence, secondary prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin is more effective than warfarin for cancer-related venous thromboembolism. However, because of the substantial pharmacy costs of extended low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis in the US, this treatment is relatively expensive compared with warfarin.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2993-2993
Author(s):  
Deborah Rund ◽  
Stav Gazal ◽  
Yosef Kalish ◽  
Chen Makranz ◽  
Neta Goldschmidt

Abstract Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent, potentially lethal, complication in patients with cancer. Patients with brain tumors are at a particularly high risk for VTE. Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, involving the cranio-spinal axis. The incidence of VTE in patients with PCNSL is as high as 30-60% in various series, occurring mostly in the early period of therapy. Due to this high incidence, the policy in our medical center since the year 2005, is to treat with prophylactic low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) from the time of PCNSL diagnosis until the end of treatment. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of VTE in patients with PCNSL treated with prophylactic LMWH. Material and methods: All patients ≥18 years who were diagnosed and treated for PCNSL in Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center between the years 2005-2017 were included in the study. We retrospectively reviewed their medical records for demographic details and initial disease characteristics (age at diagnosis, sex, performance status, laboratory results such as LDH, cerebrospinal fluid content and location of the growth), for details of risk factors for VTE such as diabetes, smoking or heart failure, and for personal or familial history of thrombosis. Therapeutic details including chemotherapy protocol, response to treatment and supportive care were compiled. Specifically we noted if prophylactic LMWH was given, if any complications developed due to the LMWH treatment and whether a VTE event occurred. Results: Forty four patients were included in the study. Mean age at diagnosis was 60.2 years and there were 27 (61%) females. Three (6.8%) patients had a personal history of thrombosis and 13 (29%) had a history of diabetes or smoking. Thirty two (72%) had an ECOG performance study of 0-1 at diagnosis and seven (16%) had leptomeningeal involvement. Forty one (93%) of patients were treated with a systemic high dose methotrexate (HDMTX) based protocol (mean of 7.6 courses of HDMTX per patient) and thirty two (73%) patients were treated with systemic rituximab. All 44 patients were treated with prophylactic LMWH, mostly at a dose of 40 mg per day (41 patients, 93%). Of the 44 patients, five (11%) discontinued treatment; 2 due to side effects (abnormal liver function tests and subdural hematoma (SDH)) and 3 for an unknown reason. Three (7%) patients had a minor bleeding event (gum, conjunctival, Ommaya reservoir catheter tract). One patient (2.3%) had a major bleeding event (SDH) while on LMWH treatment which was found on routine MRI imaging of the brain as he was asymptomatic. No VTE events (0%) were recorded in patients treated with LMWH. Two patients had a VTE, however both patients were off LMWH treatment at the time of VTE (one stopped LMWH, the other was diagnosed with VTE concurrently with the diagnosis of PCNSL). Conclusions: In our group of 44 PCNSL patients, prophylactic use of LMWH was highly effective, with no VTE events. Two cases of VTE occurred in our patient group, both occurred while the patients were off LMWH treatment. Only one, asymptomatic, intracranial bleed was recorded, indicating the relative safety of this treatment in PCNSL patients. Further prospective studies should be done to support the routine use of this prophylactic strategy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (8) ◽  
pp. 934-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Skeith ◽  
Marc Carrier ◽  
Susan E. Robinson ◽  
Samah Alimam ◽  
Marc A. Rodger

Abstract We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnant women with essential thrombocythemia. Twenty-one trials and 756 pregnancies met inclusion criteria. The absolute VTE risk in the antepartum period is not above a threshold where low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis is clearly indicated or below a threshold where LMWH should be withheld (2.5%; 95% CI, 1.3-4.3). Postpartum, the absolute VTE risk is above a threshold where postpartum LMWH prophylaxis should be considered (4.4%; 95% CI, 1.2-9.5).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document