Visual functional outcomes of cataract surgery in the United States, Canada, Denmark, and Spain

2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 2135-2142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Christian Norregaard ◽  
Peter Bernth-Petersen ◽  
Jordi Alonso ◽  
Tavs Folmer Andersen ◽  
Gerard F. Anderson
1983 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter J. Stark ◽  
M. Cristina Leske ◽  
David M. Worthen ◽  
George C. Murray

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 705-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul B. Greenberg ◽  
Annika Havnaer ◽  
Thomas A. Oetting ◽  
Francisco J. Garcia-Ferrer

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
James J García ◽  
Karlita L Warren ◽  
Fengmei Gong ◽  
Honggang Wang

Introduction: Stroke is one of the leading cause of disability and death in the United States (Benjamin et al., 2018). Inpatient rehabilitation is the gold standard treatment for post-acute care (Weinstein et al., 2016). Data indicate a discharge to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) following the acute stroke phase has increased (Buntin, Colla, & Escarce, 2009). The inpatient milieu provides a unique opportunity to examine predictors of functional outcomes using a captive sample. Thus, the current study aim is to identify factors associated with poststroke functional outcomes throughout inpatient rehabilitation. Method: This is a cross-sectional and retrospective analysis of data extracted from an administrative database during years 2005-2016 from 244,286 stroke patients across 30% of IRFs in the U.S. Inclusion criteria were patients at or above the age 18 with stroke as an admitting diagnosis using ICD 9/10 codes 430-438/I60-I69. Dependent variables were: admission Total FIM, Total FIM efficiency, discharge Total FIM, and length of stay (LOS). Results: Using separate regression analyses, marital status, admit year, type of admission, race/ethnicity, insurance type, sex, age, number of complications, number of comorbidities, and stroke type, emerged as significant predictors of functional outcomes throughout inpatient rehabilitation. Moreover, those with greater comorbidities and complications were associated with lower admission FIM total score, less total FIM efficiency, lower discharge FIM total score, and a longer LOS. Compared to NHWs, racial/ethnic people were associated with lower FIM scores throughout inpatient rehabilitation and a longer length of stay. Discussion: In this robust national dataset, data indicate clinical and sociodemographic factors are significantly associated with poststroke functional outcomes throughout inpatient rehabilitation. Implications are discussed within a framework of social determinants of health.


Ophthalmology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzann Pershing ◽  
Flora Lum ◽  
Stephen Hsu ◽  
Scott Kelly ◽  
Michael F. Chiang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (9) ◽  
pp. 961-964
Author(s):  
Kathryn C. Kelley ◽  
Alex Alers ◽  
Charles Bendas ◽  
Peter G. Thomas ◽  
James Cipolla ◽  
...  

Enmeshment of emergency trauma providers (ETPs) into the United States health-care fabric resulted in the establishment of a formalized surgical critical care fellowship and certification for emergency medicine trainees. The aim of this study was to compare trauma outcomes for surgery-trained providers (STPs) and ETPs at our institution, hypothesizing patient outcome equivalency. We performed an institutional review board–exempt institutional registry review (January 1, 2004 to August 1, 2018), comparing 74 STPs and 6 ETPs. Comparator variables included all-cause mortality, all-cause morbidity, CTimaging studies per provider, time in ED (min), hospital/ICU lengths of stay, ICU admissions, and functional outcomes on discharge. Statistical comparisons included chi-square test for categorical data and analysis of covariance for continuous data (adjustments made for patient age, Injury Severity Score, and trauma mechanism; all P < 0.20). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, with an equivalence study design. A total of 33,577 trauma resuscitations were reviewed (32,299 STP-led and 1,278 ETP-led). Except for patient age (STP 50.2 ± 25.9 vs ETP 54.9 ± 25.3 years), Injury Severity Score (8.47 ± 8.14 vs 9.22 ± 8.40), and ICU admissions (16.1% vs 18.8%), we noted no significant intergroup differences. ETPs’ performance was equivalent to that of STPs for all primary comparator variables (mortality, morbidity, CT utilization, time in the ED, lengths of stay, and functional outcomes). Incorporation of ETPs into our trauma center resulted in outcome parity between ETPs and STPs, while simultaneously expanding the expertise and experiential diversity within our multidisciplinary team. This study provides support for further incorporation of ETPs as equal partners across the growing network of United States regional trauma centers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document