P.4.b.021 Symptom provocation through virtual reality in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD)

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. S599 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.S. Kasanmoentalib ◽  
M.J. Van Bennekom ◽  
D. Denys ◽  
P.P. De Koning
2013 ◽  
Vol 229 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Cipresso ◽  
Filippo La Paglia ◽  
Caterina La Cascia ◽  
Giuseppe Riva ◽  
Giovanni Albani ◽  
...  

10.2196/11643 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. e11643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Ferreri ◽  
Alexis Bourla ◽  
Charles-Siegfried Peretti ◽  
Tomoyuki Segawa ◽  
Nemat Jaafari ◽  
...  

Background New technologies are set to profoundly change the way we understand and manage psychiatric disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Developments in imaging and biomarkers, along with medical informatics, may well allow for better assessments and interventions in the future. Recent advances in the concept of digital phenotype, which involves using computerized measurement tools to capture the characteristics of a given psychiatric disorder, is one paradigmatic example. Objective The impact of new technologies on health professionals’ practice in OCD care remains to be determined. Recent developments could disrupt not just their clinical practices, but also their beliefs, ethics, and representations, even going so far as to question their professional culture. This study aimed to conduct an extensive review of new technologies in OCD. Methods We conducted the review by looking for titles in the PubMed database up to December 2017 that contained the following terms: [Obsessive] AND [Smartphone] OR [phone] OR [Internet] OR [Device] OR [Wearable] OR [Mobile] OR [Machine learning] OR [Artificial] OR [Biofeedback] OR [Neurofeedback] OR [Momentary] OR [Computerized] OR [Heart rate variability] OR [actigraphy] OR [actimetry] OR [digital] OR [virtual reality] OR [Tele] OR [video]. Results We analyzed 364 articles, of which 62 were included. Our review was divided into 3 parts: prediction, assessment (including diagnosis, screening, and monitoring), and intervention. Conclusions The review showed that the place of connected objects, machine learning, and remote monitoring has yet to be defined in OCD. Smartphone assessment apps and the Web Screening Questionnaire demonstrated good sensitivity and adequate specificity for detecting OCD symptoms when compared with a full-length structured clinical interview. The ecological momentary assessment procedure may also represent a worthy addition to the current suite of assessment tools. In the field of intervention, CBT supported by smartphone, internet, or computer may not be more effective than that delivered by a qualified practitioner, but it is easy to use, well accepted by patients, reproducible, and cost-effective. Finally, new technologies are enabling the development of new therapies, including biofeedback and virtual reality, which focus on the learning of coping skills. For them to be used, these tools must be properly explained and tailored to individual physician and patient profiles.


2018 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 176-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masafumi Yoshimura ◽  
Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui ◽  
Keiichiro Nishida ◽  
Yuichi Kitaura ◽  
Hiroshi Mii ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 102034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fern Jaspers-Fayer ◽  
Sarah Yao Lin ◽  
Elaine Chan ◽  
Rhonda Ellwyn ◽  
Ryan Lim ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 718-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine J. van Bennekom ◽  
M. Soemiati Kasanmoentalib ◽  
Pelle P. de Koning ◽  
Damiaan Denys

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document