A spatio-temporal comparison of semantic and episodic cued recall and recognition using event-related brain potentials

1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ray Johnson ◽  
Kurt Kreiter ◽  
John Zhu ◽  
Britt Russo
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annekathrin Schacht ◽  
Pascal Vrtička

Social information is highly intrinsically relevant for the human species because of its direct link to guiding physiological responses and behavior. Accordingly, extant functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data suggest that social content may form a unique stimulus dimension. It remains largely unknown, however, how neural activity underlying social (versus nonsocial) information processing temporally unfolds, and how such social information appraisal may interact with the processing of other stimulus characteristics, particularly emotional meaning. Here, we presented complex visual scenes differing in both social (versus nonsocial) and emotional relevance (positive, negative, neutral) intermixed with scrambled versions of these pictures to N= 24 healthy young adults. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to intact pictures were examined for gaining insight to the dynamics of appraisal of both dimensions, implemented within the brain. Our main finding is an early interaction between social and emotional relevance due to enhanced amplitudes of early ERP components to emotionally positive pictures of social compared to nonsocial content, presumably reflecting rapid allocation of attention and counteracting an overall negativity bias. Importantly, our ERP data show high similarity with previously observed fMRI data using the same stimuli, and source estimations located the ERP effects in overlapping occipito-temporal brain areas. Our new data suggest that relevance detection may occur already as early as around 100 ms after stimulus onset and may combine relevance checks not only examining intrinsic pleasantness/emotional valence, but also social content as a unique, highly relevant stimulus dimension.


2000 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 924-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Ullsperger ◽  
Axel Mecklinger ◽  
Ulrich Müller

A central issue in the research of directed forgetting is whether the differential memory performance for to-be-remembered (TBR) and to-be-forgotten (TBF) items is solely due to differential encoding or whether retrieval inhibition of TBF items plays an additional role. In this study, recognition-related event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were used to examine this issue. The spatio-temporal distributions of the old/new ERP effects obtained in Experiment 1 that employed a directed forgetting paradigm were compared with those recorded in Experiment 2 in which the level of processing was manipulated. In Experiment 1, participants were instructed to remember or to forget words by means of a cue presented after each word. ERPs recorded in the recognition test revealed early phasic frontal and parietal old/new effects for TBR items, whereas TBF items elicited only a frontal old/new effect. Moreover, a late right-frontal positive slow wave was more pronounced for TBF items, suggesting that those items were associated with a larger amount of post-retrieval processing. In Experiment 2, the same cueing method and the same stimulus materials were used, and memory encoding was manipulated by cueing participants to process the words either deeply or shallowly. Both deeply and shallowly encoded items elicited phasic frontal and parietal old/new effects followed by a late right-frontal positive slow wave. However, in contrast to TBR and TBF items, these effects differed only quantitatively. The results suggest that differential encoding alone cannot account for the effects of directed forgetting. They are more consistent with the view that items followed by an instruction to forget become inhibited and less accessible, and, therefore, more difficult to retrieve.


1998 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ray Johnson ◽  
Kurt Kreiter ◽  
Britt Russo ◽  
John Zhu

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela D. Friederici ◽  
Axel Mecklinger ◽  
Kevin M. Spencer ◽  
Karsten Steinhauer ◽  
Emanuel Donchin

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 49-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
MS Soldevilla ◽  
SM Wiggins ◽  
JA Hildebrand

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document