5096 Background: Sorafenib (SOR) doubled median progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in a phase III study (TARGETs) for previously treated pts with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We report on pts who had not received any prior systemic anti- cancer therapy (1st line) for advanced RCC from the ARCCS program in the US and Canada, which enrolled a broad range of pts. Methods: Pts received SOR 400 mg bid in the ARCCS open-label, nonrandomized treatment protocol if they were =15 years old with advanced (unresectable, recurrent or metastatic) RCC and had ECOG PS 0–2. In the US, ARCCS enrollment ended with SOR approval in 12/05, and pts were transitioned to commercial drug with 1st line pts being eligible for an additional 6-mo follow-up in an extension protocol (EP); Canadian enrollment completed in 8/06. Response evaluation (baseline and =1 post-baseline radiologic assessment) was conducted every 4 wks in the main study and every 8 wks during the EP. Pts without a confirmatory scan were classified as unconfirmed PR. The primary efficacy analysis on PFS was pre-specified to be performed only on the EP-enrolled pts. Results: Of the 2,488 pts valid for safety in ARCCS, nearly 50% were 1st line (n=1239) of which 69% were male with median age 65 yrs; 77% had prior nephrectomy and 29% had prior radiotherapy. Time from diagnoses to treatment was <1 yr for 52% and =1 yr 36% in these 1st line pts. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events with >2% incidence included hand-foot skin reaction 7.7%, fatigue 4.7%, hypertension 3.8%, rash/desquamation 5.2%, dehydration 2.9, diarrhea and dyspnea 2.6%. Confirmed responses are reported in the table ; 15% had unconfirmed PRs. For the 224 1st line pts enrolled in the EP, median PFS was 35.1 wks (95% CI; 32.7, 41.9). Conclusions: SOR toxicity in 1st line pts appeared similar to that in both overall and 2nd line populations previously reported in the phase III study. The PFS among patients enrolled in the EP is encouraging, but may be biased by low enrollment and selection for non-progressors. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
Nivolumab versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: Updated results with long‐term follow‐up of the randomized, open‐label, phase 3 CheckMate 025 trial