Transient expression of the Drosophila melanogaster cinnabar gene rescues eye color in the white eye (WE) strain of Aedes aegypti

1997 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 993-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J Cornel ◽  
Mark Q. Benedict ◽  
Cristina Salazar Rafferty ◽  
Antony J Howells ◽  
Frank.H Collins
Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 157 (3) ◽  
pp. 1257-1265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsiao-Pei Yang ◽  
Ana Y Tanikawa ◽  
Wayne A Van Voorhies ◽  
Joana C Silva ◽  
Alexey S Kondrashov

Abstract We induced mutations in Drosophila melanogaster males by treating them with 21.2 mm ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS). Nine quantitative traits (developmental time, viability, fecundity, longevity, metabolic rate, motility, body weight, and abdominal and sternopleural bristle numbers) were measured in outbred heterozygous F3 (viability) or F2 (all other traits) offspring from the treated males. The mean values of the first four traits, which are all directly related to the life history, were substantially affected by EMS mutagenesis: the developmental time increased while viability, fecundity, and longevity declined. In contrast, the mean values of the other five traits were not significantly affected. Rates of recessive X-linked lethals and of recessive mutations at several loci affecting eye color imply that our EMS treatment was equivalent to ∼100 generations of spontaneous mutation. If so, our data imply that one generation of spontaneous mutation increases the developmental time by 0.09% at 20° and by 0.04% at 25°, and reduces viability under harsh conditions, fecundity, and longevity by 1.35, 0.21, and 0.08%, respectively. Comparison of flies with none, one, and two grandfathers (or greatgrandfathers, in the case of viability) treated with EMS did not reveal any significant epistasis among the induced mutations.


1993 ◽  
Vol 155 (2) ◽  
pp. 558-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonggu Lin ◽  
Martha T. Hamblin ◽  
Marten J. Edwards ◽  
Carolina Barillas-Mury ◽  
Michael R. Kanost ◽  
...  

1968 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 376-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armin Wessing ◽  
Dieter Eichelberg

The Malpighian tubules of Drosophila melanogaster accumulate a great number of substances, many of which fluoresce. This paper is concerned with the identification of these substances by chromatography and their location by fluorescentmicroscopy (fig. 4, 5). It appears that they mainly belong to the following three groups: Pteridines, tryptophane and some of its metabolites, and riboflavine (tab. 1).The pattern of fluorescent substances of the eye color mutants cn, v, se, st, bw, ry, and w vary significantly. The patterns of these mutants are compared and discussed with that of the wild-type.


Genetics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Sequeira ◽  
C R Nelson ◽  
P Szauter

Abstract The claret (ca) locus of Drosophila melanogaster comprises two separately mutable domains, one responsible for eye color and one responsible for proper disjunction of chromosomes in meiosis and early cleavage divisions. Previously isolated alleles are of three types: (1) alleles of the claret (ca) type that affect eye color only, (2) alleles of the claret-nondisjunctional (cand) type that affect eye color and chromosome behavior, and (3) a meiotic mutation, non-claret disjunctional (ncd), that affects chromosome behavior only. In order to investigate the genetic structure of the claret locus, we have isolated 19 radiation-induced alleles of claret on the basis of the eye color phenotype. Two of these 19 new alleles are of the cand type, while 17 are of the ca type, demonstrating that the two domains do not often act as a single target for mutagenesis. This suggests that the two separately mutable functions are likely to be encoded by separate or overlapping genes rather than by a single gene. One of the new alleles of the cand type is a chromosome rearrangement with a breakpoint at the position of the claret locus. If this breakpoint is the cause of the mutant phenotype and there are no other mutations associated with the rearrangement, the two functions must be encoded by overlapping genes.


1975 ◽  
Vol 13 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 273-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Howells ◽  
Rosemary L. Ryall

1979 ◽  
Vol 17 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 565-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Sullivan ◽  
L. Anne Bell ◽  
Duncan R. Paton ◽  
Marie C. Sullivan

1939 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. TATUM ◽  
G. W. BEADLE

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document