Directional variation in distance decay

1996 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 280
1995 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 715-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
A S Fotheringham ◽  
T C Pitts

Given that geographers excel at measuring and explaining spatial variations in attributes, it is surprising that they are not more aware that relationships may vary over space. It is still normal practice, for example, to estimate a set of parameters in a model and to assume that the relationships represented by these values apply equally to all locations and in all directions. Recently, however, there have been several applications of Casetti's expansion method that have been focused on measuring anisotropic trends around locations. Here this technique is used to examine possible anisotropy in distance-decay relationships around origins. That is, the authors attempt to answer the question: does the rate of distance decay vary with direction? The conclusions reached in previous research on this topic are only partially supported here. Via US migration data, it is suggested that although there is evidence of directional variation in distance decay around some origins, and this evidence leads to some interesting insights into the mental representation of space by US migrants, it is impossible to identify any overall trend across origins in directional variability.


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 607-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Badi Hasisi ◽  
Simon Perry ◽  
Yonatan Ilan ◽  
Michael Wolfowicz

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mats Målqvist ◽  
Nazmul Sohel ◽  
Tran T Do ◽  
Leif Eriksson ◽  
Lars-Åke Persson

2021 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 103768
Author(s):  
Arleu B. Viana-Junior ◽  
Caroline C. De-Souza ◽  
Hermes Fonseca de Medeirosc ◽  
Fernando da S. Carvalho-Filho

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongxin Deng ◽  
Brendan Wallace ◽  
Derek Maassen ◽  
Johnathan Werner

AbstractA geographical information system (GIS) perspective is taken to examine conceptual and methodological complications present in tornado density and probability mapping. Tornado density is defined as the inverse-distance-weighted count of tornado touchdown points or tornado-affected cells within a neighborhood area. The paper first adds a few geographic elements into the tornado definition and then characterizes tornado density as a density field in GIS that depends on predefined, modifiable areas to exist. Tornado density is therefore conceptually distinguished from both individual tornadoes and tornado probability. Three factors are identified to be vital in tornado density mapping: the neighborhood size, the distance decay function, and the choice of tornado properties. Correspondingly, 12 neighborhood sizes ranging from 20 to 360 km are tested, four distance decay functions are compared, and two tornado properties—tornado touchdown locations and pathlengths—are separately incorporated in mapping. GIS interpretations, clarifications, and demonstrations are provided for these factors to reach a thorough understanding of how the factors function and affect the resultant tornado density maps. Historical tornado data of the eastern half of the United States from 1973 to 2013 are used in these demonstrations. Uncertainty and propagation analyses are recommended for future tornado density and probability mapping, and a Monte Carlo simulation using tornado pathlength data is conducted as an example of uncertainty modeling. In all, tornado density mapping is diagnosed as a largely subjective activity, and the mapper needs to make multiple choices according to the mapping purpose, scale, and the involved tornado record data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document