Correlation in price changes and volatility of major Latin American stock markets

1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Christofi ◽  
A. Pericli
Author(s):  
Juliano Ribeiro de Almeida ◽  
Daniel Reed Bergmann ◽  
José Roberto Ferreira Savoia ◽  
Guilherme Ribeiro de Almeida ◽  
Marina Arantes Braga
Keyword(s):  

1990 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Hamao ◽  
Ronald W. Masulis ◽  
Victor Ng

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-56
Author(s):  
Júlio Lobão ◽  
Natércia Fortuna ◽  
Franklin Silva

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (37) ◽  
pp. 5-28
Author(s):  
Juan Benjamín Duarte Duarte ◽  
Zulay Yesenia Ramírez León ◽  
Katherine Julieth Sierra Suárez

This paper assesses the existence of the size effect on the most important stock markets in Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Peru) for the period between 2002 and 2012, using the cross-section contrast methodology of the size effect in the CAPM context. Results show that there is reversed effect in some of the Latin American markets.


DYNA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (196) ◽  
pp. 143-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Semei Coronado-Ramirez ◽  
Omar Rojas-Altamirano ◽  
Rafael Romero-Meza ◽  
Francisco Venegas-Martínez

<p>This work applies a test that detects dependence between pairs of variables. The kind of dependence is a non-linear one, and the test is known as cross-bicorrelation, which is associated with Brooks and Hinich [1]. We study dependence periods between U.S. Standard and Poor's 500 (SP500), used as a benchmark, and six Latin American stock market indexes: Mexico (BMV), Brazil (BOVESPA), Chile (IPSA), Colombia (COLCAP), Peru (IGBVL) and Argentina (MERVAL). We have found windows of nonlinear dependence and comovement between the SP500 and the Latin American stock markets, some of which coincide with periods of crisis, leading to an interpretation of a possible contagion or interdependence.</p>


2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Lael Joseph ◽  
Khelifa Mazouz

In this paper, the authors examine the impacts of large price changes (or shocks) on the abnormal returns (ARs) of a set of 39 national stock indices. Their initial results support returns continuations for both positive and negative shocks in line with prior results. After controlling for market size, their findings provide support for over-reaction, return continuations and market efficiency, but these result depend on the magnitude of the price shocks. Whilst the market is efficient when the positive shocks are large, the market also over-reacts when negative shocks are large. To illustrate, for large stock markets that are more liquid, positive shocks of more than 5% generate an insignificant day one CAR of -0.004%, whilst negative shocks of more than 5% generate a positive and significant day one CAR of 0.662%. In contrast, positive (negative) shocks of less than 5% generate a significant one day CAR of 0.119% (-0.174%) for these same (large) stock markets.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Chikashi Tsuji

This study empirically examines the return transmission effects between the four North and Latin American stock markets in the US, Canada, Brazil, and Mexico. More specifically, applying a standard vector autoregression (VAR) model, we obtain the following interesting findings. First, (1) the return transmission effects between the four North and Latin American stock markets became much tighter in our second subsample period. Second, (2) in particular, US and Mexican stock markets are strong return transmitters in the recent period. Furthermore, (3) both in our first and second subsample periods, Brazilian stock returns do not transmit to the other three stock returns, although the other three North and Latin American stock markets affect the Brazilian stock market.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document